Just to be super nerdy, here's an amazingly well-written article on the subject from someone with a lot of credibility: https://chrisdown.name/2026/03/24/zswap-vs-zram-when-to-use-what.html
tldr; prefer zswap
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
Just to be super nerdy, here's an amazingly well-written article on the subject from someone with a lot of credibility: https://chrisdown.name/2026/03/24/zswap-vs-zram-when-to-use-what.html
tldr; prefer zswap
In my testing, zram has much, much better compression than zswap.
The points about LRU inversion, cgroups, and so on are valid, but at the end of the day, I don't really care. I was able to open as many firefox tabs as I wanted with zram, but I could not do so with zswap, and that's what matters to me.
The author of a blogpost is a facebook engineer. Millions of ultra high performance Linux servers are a very different usecase than a single desktop. It's perfectly reasonable for a solution for one to not be appropriate for the other.
i prefer ram

/swapfile
sudo swapon /deeznuts is my favourite as it's a valid command
You have to fallocate /deeznuts first.
or dd(eeznuts) it!
I never could get a clear understanding of these. I just throw a partition on the nvme for swap as a failover. If it starts to fill, treat it like the countdown timer in uplink.
upvote for uplink reference.
Just switched to zswap on my cachyOS install and I can feel the difference. I had freezes where the system chugs when I have several processes running. Now, I don't get them anymore. Not gonna pretend that I understand everything about them fully, but I searched online and some folks recommended zswap and I went with it.
Is it possible to have both? I'm finding zram works well until it doesn't.
I got corrected some time ago about this, it seems it's possible, but not advisable. Like, if zram started, zswap will disable itself.
If you want to test zswap, you could create a swap file, disable systemds zram service and put the zswap variables into the kernel variables, also checking if swappiness is at the normal values, instead of the tuned ones for zram.
theres zswap?
I use default Debian settings for zram myself, simple setup.
Never experienced slowdowns, got my Raspi4 using it + utilizing a tmpfs.
Got a luanti server with the world sqlite data base living on the tmpfs which is very snappy & utilize a mildly complex script that utilizes rsync to copy from ssd to tmpfs at start & only the changes back to the ssd at shutdown.
Now when you want to do larger tasks that require gobs of space or you're using nvmes, Ive read that zswap is better.
Can maybe use ramdisk (kernel opt) with btrfs for built in snapshot and diff send.
@milagemayvary@mstdn.social
Yeah, I used zram on the past, it's really good, but some OOMs and stutters under high memory pressure made me change to zswap with lz4, it's a very intelligent cache for these high memory use scenarios. But mounting a directory directly to memory is a very needed feature for zswap hahaha.
Computers
magnets