this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
827 points (97.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39825 readers
3546 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 101 points 1 week ago (5 children)

One thing I always hated about microblogs and their character limits was that it was just enough characters to spout stupid bullshit but never enough to explain to why it's wrong.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And you can't just be like "Ok I have master's degree in this specific subject" because then the response is inevitably some form of "ok then please provide sources which would allow me to condense 6 years of your education into something I can refute in 6 minutes, and refusing to do so will out you as a liar."

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why interact on an even playing field? Just make like 15 accounts and convince them they have a neurological disorder like a normal human being.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're explaining, you're loosing.

Introduction to elementary debate, 17th addition. page 1.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That's fucking idiotic. It's basically formalizing the whole "Whoever talks loudest and proudest wins" instead of "Whoever has the most valid and factual argument wins"

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

It's unfortunately just how things work. Facts only matter to people who care about the truth, and a lot of people don't.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

George Will on Donald Trump and Twitter.

"It's perfect for him, because he can encapsulate everything he knows into 140 characters."

[–] dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexus 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i wonder how intentional it was.

more argument = more engagement = more ad watching = more money

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I doubt they thought that far ahead, at least when Twitter was starting. Smartphones didn’t really exist back then, except maybe some BlackBerrys and Palm Pilot-type phones. The 140 character limit on Twitter was so the tweets could fit in a standard 160 character SMS message. It operated basically entirely over SMS; I’m not sure they even had a web version in the early days. I still remember getting messages on my flip phone from 40404, the number they used. Once I was in the Oregon desert on vacation for a week without signal and when I got back to a signal my phone kept buzzing for 20 minutes as all the tweets I’d missed were delivered. No algorithm back then, you got everything from people you followed, and no advertising either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The common pattern I see often is that they simply refuse to address or even acknowledge your points and instead just spout even more bullshit. Once I see that, I just block and move on.

I have no time for intellectually dishonest people.

[–] godzillabacter@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

"Never argue with stupid people because they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." George Carlin

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Gish galloping is a well known argumentative technique to avoid scrutiny. It works so well, that now the US government is using a version of it to destroy the government at a rapid pace.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] axh@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In science there is an answer "you are not even wrong" which is a polite way of saying that wat you said makes so little sense, that it cannot even be disproven.

[–] JohnSmith@feddit.uk 17 points 1 week ago

Originally used by Wolfgan Pauli, I believe. He also said “I don't mind your thinking slowly; I mind your publishing faster than you think.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So often it's me typing out a big old comment. Realizing I can preempt some nuance to help the conversation. Thinking of a dozen more little nitpicks that might happen and realizing it's just not worth it and it's really the idiocy of the argument that's making it so hard to explain myself.

[–] GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You encountered Brandolini's Law aka the Bullshit Asymmetry Principle: it takes an order of magnitude more effort to debunk bullshit than it takes to produce it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see you have met my in-laws. This isn't just some boomer humor, they have truly transcended their Fox News addicted roots and now get really angry about aliens, chemtrails, and all sorts of bullshit.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Same here man. Its insanity. It has to be the lead. People can't be this stupid otherwise right

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Ruts in thinking. Fox News has given them the tools to win any argument with little effort on their part... Any person attempting to provide a sound argument is flooded with BS and gives up... Which they consider a win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fum@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I met a guy in a sauna the other day who started preaching to me and saying that he doesn't believe in science because it contradicts the bible story of creation.

I just had nothing to say to this man. His perception of reality is so far off base that I cannot comprehend his thought processes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There are some people who have just been filled with so much wrong information over the course of their life that it's impossible to reach them. Anything you say to them will have a keyword that puts their guard up, any fact you share would be fake news. It's like their brains have been encrypted with the propaganda and hate. It's pavlovian. I try to recognize it in myself and maintain an open mind but it's hard.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now imagine that they're your parents.

It's fucking awful.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Truthtwopower@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every maga I come across. Just a bag full of excuses for pedophiles.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Those are one of the groups I'm talking about

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matombo@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"Right extremists are defending Democracy"

Just 2 weeks ago and I still haven't recovered from hearing that in person.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I used to work with people who would smoke whatever weed their friend gave them but wouldn't get the covid vaccine because "you don't know what's in it"

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It's not worth the effort to break down their position, and present coherent arguments back to them. They'll just completely miss what you're trying to say, and blast back more incomprehensible BS. It's just raw, blind, ignorant anger, most of the time, we can't refute emotion with logic, they just don't hear it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

MAGAs. Sometimes I don't even debate them, I ignore them and talk about them as if they weren't there, make fun of their arguments, laugh at them, mock them, just generally bully them, without even addressing them directly. They really hate that.

MAGAs and Anti-Vaxxers are about the only acceptable bullying targets, and they should be bullied as viciously and as relentlessly as possible. The damage they have done is incalculable, they deserve it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Brandolini's law (or the bullshit asymmetry principle) is an Internet adage coined in 2013 by Italian programmer Alberto Brandolini. It compares the considerable effort of debunking misinformation to the relative ease of creating it in the first place. The adage states:

The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.[1][2]

The challenge of refuting bullshit does not come just from its time-consuming nature, but also from the challenge of defying and confronting one's community.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Yes, I block them, after I make sure that they're insistent on being disingenuous, and not merely misinformed.

Related: Pretty sure I've blocked most of the .world moderators/admins at this point.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Thankfully the fediverse is still small enough that blocking people has a noticable effect. On reddit, for every person you block there's 4 more to take their place.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

7/10 ppl online.

But w lemme its still 7/10....but there's obly like 10 users so I can handle it.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (14 children)

online arguments never change minds, they only serve to galvanize each persons prior beliefs

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago

Its not about changing your opponent's mind. It's about the people reading along. You aren't talking to your opponent. You're talking to the audience you share with that opponent. Never forget that.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

So far I only really experienced this with two people on the Fediverse. @SmartmanApps@programming.dev (I have no compunction about @ing him, I assume he's blocked me since he stopped replying to me ages ago - does that mean I win??) seems mainly to use the internet to further his incorrect beliefs about maths. He's a maths teacher, but his knowledge seems to run out around the end of high school maths (contradicting some high school maths), and he doesn't have the intellect to understand how maths beyond that point even works: he fundamentally doesn't understand what a mathematical definition is, for example, so when he reads standard sources he doesn't even understand how they contradict him.

Everyone else pales in comparison.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I try not to argue with people on the internet. Its a complete waste or time and im actually surprised by how many people do it.

I dont think you can change anyones mind with comments.

[–] pieberry@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My mind has been changed by comments on here.

People can be quite informative, patient, and empathetic. They can write eloquently and persuasively. I'm glad for those people who have helped me change my mind on topics where my view was wrong because of my ignorance or flawed logic.

But in all honesty, I probably would have been better served by in-person public discourse on those topics instead of spending my time reading a bunch of takes from strangers on the internet. In person, you (usually) know everyone participating is real. You can gauge their sincerity by their tone & inflection, facial cues, and body language.

While my mind has been changed by people on here commenting, I still would much rather step away from the internet and talk to people face to face about the topics that effect us the most.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gaiussabinus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Went to the UK and the director was shitting on vegans. I said, "you can hate them but at least they're good for climate change" (I ignored mentioning I was a vegan in the past). Holy fuck, non stop verbal diarrhea. He said that global warming isn't true because scientists have agendas. Global warming is when seasons change (I think he was being funny or facetious about that). He also said eating meat had some carbon in their bones and that's good for the earth or some shit.

I wasn't able to get a word in. I did eventually say that his definition of climate change would be agreed by no one. Then he came at me again and eventually ended it with "well, you started it".

I said, "yes and let's end it and move on"

He did not and then said more random shit.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

That's like 5 out of 10 on reddit.. so yeah.

Thing is out here, there is less polarization and if you've got the links and the facts that are verifiable, people can and do go "Ah! I did not know that... thanks!" and mean it.

Which I love.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I live in rual northern Nevada and everyone here is hardcore brainwashed republicans. I used to try to correct them when they said dumb shit but it just made me look stupid, so now I just watch and listen to there ramblings. It’s more entertaining for me and less of a headache.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I've never tried interacting with myself like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

In my wise old age I don't waste time on fools. I no longer have the patience. I used to try to talk them out of whatever stupidity they're peddling and it was rarely successful. Not worth the effort.

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The denominator is divisible by the numerator.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Yes, i have meet a person before. I have also commented on the internet.

load more comments
view more: next ›