Please keep us out. The faster the world moves on from even interacting with the US the better.
this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
286 points (99.7% liked)
politics
29562 readers
1839 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Also build up your armies. We're still run by a man child and one of our two major political parties thinks that if we can take something, it's ours.
I won't say you're wrong but misguided. Our leaders are still behaving as if the world needs to controlled by binary ideologies. We have the ability to do great things if only we'd focus on providing for Humanity over selfishness.
I don't think an army needs to be strong enough to defeat us but strong enough to give us trouble. Without a major existential threat the US doesn't have the stomach for prolonged wars anymore.
Makes sense. The Trump admin would 100% send someone with explicit instructions to make headlines by disrupting things.
Even if they didn't obstruct, their lack of buy-in into any decided measures is a foregone conclusion. They even refuse to acknowledge the problem.
They would 100% sabotage and try to derail the event. Ignoring them is the only logical solution.
Good. It's time for the world to move on without us.
No just US. China, Russia and Saudi Arabia will also be missing. It really is time to just exclude those countries from global negotiations. They only goal is obstruction. This should have been done a decade ago.
Not to be a tankie, but it does seem China is making some headway in clean energy, thank god. Hopefully it makes up for us as fuck up in some way and we don't pass any points of no return 😅
Not so random question: does the US have laws forbidding a senator or other federal official from accepting a direct invite to something like this without approval?
I.E. if the invitation was extended to someone who would support the initiative, even if not approved by the administration?
Technically no. Especially if an invite gets extended to someone in the legislative branch.
But we're in fascism times now. Trump can fuck up anyone who opposes him.
It would be a waste, even if the person accepts they have to bring it back to be voted on.
Perhaps this is a challenge goal to help reestablish international trust once we start recovering from our current national mental breakdown
Is it too much to dream that even after jumping on board late, we reach the finish line while helping support our fellow nations across?
I think it's more about hedging bets against the US never recovering from the current mental breakdown.
Yes. Even if a sane administration gets in again, the trust is gone. If this can happen twice it probably will happen once again in the not too distant future.
Trust comes on foot and leaves on horseback.
The US, and a few other petrostates, which have worked together to block consensus within the existing COP process
That's what Trump wants, right? To isolate the US from other countries and let them work stuff out themselves? Looks like his strategy is working. But of course cry baby wants to be included and mingle in other countries' business.
Trump doesn't want anything but money and power. He has the most base motivations of anyone I've ever seen. Any actual strategy does not come from him. He's too clumsy and unintelligent for planning things in a coherent manner.
The US is irrelevant in these conversations.
It's a global imperative, as well as in most nations own security interests, to become independent of fossil fuels.
What needs to be agreed is how the willing are going to fight back against the oil baron's billions, because they'll do anything, anything, to remain relevant and profitable.
Understandable
Sounds like a good idea. The petrostate should be excluded.
Yeah, it'd be unhelpful at best to have an American representative involved. But more likely they'd be actively trying to sabotage the whole thing, so this was pretty obviously the right move.
As they should.