this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
484 points (99.6% liked)

You Should Know

45607 readers
1149 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As one meta-analysis put it:

It’s estimated that an increase of one hour per day of outdoor time could reduce the occurrence of myopia in children by 45%.

Make sure your kids spend time outside, folks!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

I spent 90% of my early childhood outdoors. Didn't work.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 6 points 13 hours ago

but my electronic image generator makes bam bam noise, must spend more money for more RAM

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Does it work for adults too?

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

It probably helps against making it worse. My father always told about the 30-30-30 rule.

Every 30 minutes

For 30 seconds

Looking at least 30 Meters into the distance

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

No. Interestingly once myopia does start developing this doesn't seem to slow the progression. It seems to be good for prevention and that's it

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

No, it has to do with growth. An adult eye no longer grows significantly.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Good try child sports teams. I ain't touching that grass unless you make me.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Sometimes I wonder if people see numbers like 45% and think "OMG, 45% chance!" instead of "small number * 1.45 = another small number."

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Considering that a fairly large percentage of children develop myopia (as high as 80-90% in some countries) a 45% reduction would be fairly significant, no? Or am I missing something

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

where are you getting these numbers.. from what I can see, the global average was 23% in 2000 and 34% today.

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

The 80-90% claim seems to be repeated in various areas on the internet, including by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, which I assume to be reputable:

Over recent decades, the prevalence of myopia has skyrocketed, particularly in Asia. In countries like China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan, up to 80-90% of teenagers and young adults are now myopic.

Of course these local averages are still consistent with a lower global average

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 29 points 1 day ago (13 children)

My eyes have been terrible since 1st grade. My prescription got as high as 9s.

Then I got cataract surgery on one eye, and I can see nearly perfectly without glasses for the first time in my life. This summer, I'm getting the other one done, and I won't have to wear glasses anymore, for the first time in my life.

Anyway, the point is: As I was talking to the eye surgeon, and mentioned my bad eyesight, he told me why: I have the eyeballs of a man who is 7'2" tall, jammed into my 5'11" skull. Apparently, I have enormous eyes, which nobody has ever mentioned to me, other than one brief girlfriend who used to comment on my gigantic green eyes.

If I had to get something big from a 7'2" inch man, why did it have to be eyeballs?

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

You were made for anime, not office work

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

If we take your eyeballs and take my teeth ("You have the roots of a 6'5" man" inside my 5'4" female body) we have the start of a good build!

Which of us is Doctor Frankenstein though?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myopia says that both terms exist in English? Not a native speaker; I think I have seen "nearsightedness" more often in English but my first language's term for it translates to "shortsightedness". 🤷‍♂️

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

IDK why it would say that, I'm a native speaker and the two terms have different meanings. Short-sightedness refers to not planning for long-term problems.

Edit: looking at what comes up in search, I see it showing up that way. I guess words change if we use them incorrectly for long enough. I'd be awfully confused if someone started talking about my short-sightedness as anything other than a flaw in my problem-solving abilities.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I guess words change if we use them incorrectly for long enough.

Looking at the etymology, it appears that short sighted started as the medical term, with it's relation to foresight coming later. It's also older than nearsighted.

It may be less common in modern contexts, but it's definitely a "correct" use.

Also: all words are made up and the points don't matter.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 13 hours ago

ok, "Kurzsichtigkeit" in German definitely has both meanings without this causing confusion in practice

[–] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

Both terms depend on context. If you talk about someone's myopic or short sighted plan to earn money you know they're referring to a CEO.

[–] makingrain@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

We say short-sighted in Britain.

[–] nope@jlai.lu 90 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I was outside a lot and still got myopia :3

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

Congrats on the luck

[–] cenotaph@piefed.zip 22 points 1 day ago

Then you were likely genetically predetermined to be at least a little myopic, but if you spent less time outside during your developmental phases you would likely be even more nearsighted than you are now.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] quips@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

One hour of outdoor time per day is not a modest increase

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 day ago

For some people it is

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Hold up now. I grew up in the 80s when we spent the whole day outside, and I wore thick ass lenses all through grade school.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

"Reduces chances" does not mean "prevents"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MrWrinkles@leminal.space 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"Also, while various theories such as increased light exposure, release of dopamine from retina, increased depth of field have been suggested to explain the protective effect of outdoor time, the mechanism remains to be elucidated"

Correlation is not causation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure short-sightedness is more a result of patience and critical thinking, but outdoors might help near-sightedness.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If you get this type of short sight vision, you can train your eyes to get the vision back as this is caused by the eyes strength.

But if you have the type that has to do with your eye shape going outside will do nothing, and you can exercise it away

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

well, i can concur. my eyes have trouble adjusting to looking into the distance when i have spent hours in front of the screen. they adapt after a few minutes to hours though.

load more comments
view more: next ›