Prick of a CEO waxes lyrical about another prick of a CEO.
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
120 points (95.5% liked)
PC Gaming
14523 readers
524 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'll never forgive them for ruining KSP2
"Bullshitting" is probably the strongest capability of LLMs.
Elon Musk is useless, and thus cannot be automated away.
Sure he can!
We can tie him to a butchery conveyor belt and let automation take him away!
AI could never do ketamine and wave a chainsaw around in public. Those are uniquely human talents.
Musk doesn't really have a job, he is the owner class.
This is probably the job that would be most suitable to replace. A set of tasks where no there is not a given "best" outcome, too much information for a human to process anyway and requires no soul. So right i guess.
he's an owner, his job is to have the money
I feel like being a CEO is all about connections and who you know, it's barely work in the traditional sense. All the actual work is being done by aids.
And obviously the world only functions because all those guys, Musk, Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates, they all have aids.
Seeing how efficient and essential they can sometimes be, I'd qualify some billionaires as having super aids.
AI was always going to replace the CEO in the end, its the natural end stage of it.
Of all the people to suggest such a thing, Zelnick is an interesting one considering how well the statement transfers.
"Why wouldn't it take his job?" - Wrong verb. He doesn't need it to take his job, it needs it to do his job. So he can have more money for doing even less.
Management is probable one of the most suited tasks for an llm to solve for. No given "best" outcome of decisions, too much information in most cases for a human to process anyway and requires no soul. So right i guess.
Wouldn't it take Zelnick's job?
I don't think AI is ready to have as much sex as possible while human cattle do the actual work.