this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
253 points (95.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11342 readers
2996 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Janx@piefed.social 9 points 1 hour ago

Everyone:
Anti-vaxxers: "You are just getting vaccines to be trendy, not to protect your family and others!"

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone just ignoring the vaccine scepticism eh?

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

No that's central to what quualifies it as a meme to me. The only funny thing in this oost is how he compares simpsons haters with anti vaccinators

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 14 minutes ago

with ~~anti vaccinators~~

with any-vaxxers.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 46 minutes ago

S6e3 was a clip show, s9e11 was a musical clip show.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 hours ago

As someone who grew up with the Simpsons and also pretty recently watched the first 29 seasons again, the first 9 seasons we definitely the best seasons. They're timeless. The show became too afraid to be offensive.

[–] null@lemmy.org 27 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

2026 and they're still frothing at the mouth over masks and vaccinations.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

These are the people who constantly whiner about "NPCs" just following directions without thought, showing the same line of dialogue 6 years on lol

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah I thought I was supposed to be dead from sudden onset Bill Gates microchip 5g disease by now because I'm vaccinated. But instead I'm still reading their dumb posts on the Internet.

[–] fun_times@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago

Every episode of modern Simpsons:

"[First name] [Last name]! [Pronoun]'s the best [occupation] in all of [country]."

  • Lisa Simpson, directly to the audience.

"That's right, Lisa. I'm here to [ad for a song/book/movie/space-nazi]."

  • [First name] [Last name].
[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

Aren't we up to season 37 now? Old chart?

[–] slurp@programming.dev 61 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It shows the trend but the colors make this look far more severe than the scores reflect

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah they should have had black as 5.x, grey as 6.x, white as 7.x, green as 8.x, and gold as 9.x

Or just use the Blizzard/rpg rarity colors for user defined groupings so that people can make their own thresholds for how to opine for whatever ratings.

For example, I typically think of each number as three categories: low-7s, mid 7s, and high 7s. A low 7 is watchable and decent, a mid 7 may be pretty good but not have a ton of truly moving content or messaging, and high 7s are like the last rating of ultimate popcorn - fantastic, but relatively intellectually empty. And as soon as you hit 8.0, to get there, it has to start having some levels of boundary-pushing of my expectations AND be very good.

So I would relate all of the 7s as like a Diablo green item rarity, maybe with high 7s being blues. High 8s maybe starts to get into yellows, and 9s are legendaries with mid and high 9s being reds or like Diablo ancients. Very low 7s and high 6s would definitely be whites, with mid and low 6s being greys. And anything under there... Probably also greys? Maybe have a gradient where the lower the rating, the more transparent it gets. 1.0 or 0.0 (whatever the lowest is) would have to still be visible, though.

[–] Aedis@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And now I know SCmSTR's very arbitrary scale compared to Diablo rarerity scale colors. What a time to be alive.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Automatically coloring cells is one of the things Excel excels at. Green for the upper bound (either a static number or ~90th percentile), yellow for 50th percentile, red for lower bound (static number or 10th percentile etc.). Automatically gradients everything in between. Want it more green? Lower the upper bound. Want it more red? Raise the lower bound.

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Absolutely. That's data visualisation for you

[–] thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Are they audience ratings? If so the episode quality is probably even lower towards the end as some audiences will have dropped out so you're only including the data of folk who stuck with it.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 72 points 10 hours ago (14 children)

just checked out of curiosity, s6e3 is a clip show, and s9e11 is a musical clip show

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

I've watched nearly episode in the first 20 seasons of The Simpsons three times or more but I have always skipped those episodes

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I just (re)watched S9 E11 ("All Singing, All Dancing") last night, and it's fine but if I wasn't watching during dinner I'd have skipped the episode.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

That’s when you turn on the dvd commentary track

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

I know it's a clip episode, but it's probably my favorite clip episode. Snake's horrible singing, specifically the "Ooo ooo ooo" before the act break always sticks with me. The "Ough oouu uuuah".

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Season 23 episode 22: Rating 3.9: Lisa Goes Gaga: Lisa helps Lady Gaga and learns the importance of being yourself.

Season 30 episode 18: Rating 4.6: Bart vs. Itchy and Scratchy: Krusty releases an all-female reboot of Itchy and Scratchy

We can guess at why those two got the lowest ratings of the entire series.

[–] randomdeadguy@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I could guess, but why don't you just go ahead and say it? I'm not sure what you're implying, it could be anything.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

I'd say the Gaga was for pandering to fans of a celebrity to get them to watch. Making a Gaga centric episode at the height of Gaga's popularity is pandering. As compared to having a few lines by George Harrison or Paul McCartney which were at their height of popularity 20 years earlier. When contemporary celebrities were used like Smashing Pumpkins is was as a cameo, not the focus of the entire episode.

The all woman Itchy Scratchy episode would be panned because it's punching down on the feminist movie remakes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Was there a major staff change for season 9? That's when it appears to have markedly declined.

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 39 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the show was never the same after Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein left to make Mission Hill in the late 90s. Additionally, Futurama became a primary though to people like Groening so Simpsons suffered stagnation majorly.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I've literally never heard of mission hill. Sounds like they should have stayed on The Simpsons

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Can't blame them for wanting to make their own thing, and they did a pretty good job (even if the TV stations kind of fucked them over by putting them on some bad timeslots.) Overall, I'm glad the show exists.

Art director for Mission Hill went on to work as a director for Disney (also one of the first women to work as a sole-director at Disney, coincidentally) and Bill Oakley / Josh Weinstein continued to work as writers, so I think it worked out for most parties involved in the production.

[–] Cratermaker@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 hours ago

No way, I loved that show. It was great but flew under the radar.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 15 points 9 hours ago

Seasons 3-8 are generally considered "golden age" simpsons. Theres a lull for a few seasons where it gets very patchy, then it kinda enters a long silver age where episodes are fairly consistently good, with few poor ones and even fewer universally agreed upon greats.

Many fans completely ignore 9+. Others argue where sliver age begins.

The ratings only show the golden age and then slowly declining popularity, because popularity is only ever a loose proxy for quality.

[–] homes@piefed.world 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Coincidentally, that happened to be around when the last year of Gen X graduated high school, 1997-98-ish. The internet actually started to become more of “a thing” (edit: as well as computer ownership and literacy, generally), and cell phones started to become smaller and cheaper and more ubiquitous.

Cable television had also become much more widespread and popular. Edit: so did video game consoles.

It might be connected to a cultural shift.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is consistent with my idea (which I've long had) that there was yet another quality drop around the time they switched to HD. The episodes from the 2000s are mostly still perfectly watchable IMHO, the ones from the 2010s much less so and I don't think I've ever watched a Simpsons episode from the 2020s, so can't say anything about that.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Last year a started watching from the beginning and watched until I found that I pretty consistently did not enjoy the episodes. I agree with your assessment. The last episode that I watched was from '13 or '14.

load more comments
view more: next ›