this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
442 points (99.1% liked)

News

37152 readers
2535 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The one who may not have gotten his seat at all if it wasn't for progress, blasts progress.

Clarence "Steven Candie" Thomas, raper of Anita Hill...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Samuel L. Jackson did a great job portraying him in Django Unchained.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago

This guy is an Uncle Thomas. Be it to Americans or black folk in general, he is a traitor.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Citizens v United brought to you by Clarence motherfucking Thomas and his POS wife. Progressivism allowed you to get married you pieces of shit.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 6 hours ago

Who cares what this uncle Tom ass mfer says? The judicial is violated, the legislature is violated, the executive is quite clearly violated, you got you and that's it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Centrist democrats agree with him.

About everything at all times, but particularly this.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wish this perverted fuck would just have a heart attack and die already.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'd want him to wait till after midterms at least

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Fuck that corrupt Christian nationalist motherfucker. He doesn't know or care about history, and he is the national stability threat.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Hes been reading comments on TOS videos.

[–] songwriterallnighter@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

This black man did not just oppose progressivism.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Fuck you, ungrateful sellout. Remind that bastard how he came far took a lot of blood before him. Specifically the Civil Rights Act.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 25 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The asswipe fails to realize the progressives are the ones who allowed women and minorities to occupy a SCOTUS seat.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 4 points 9 hours ago

And for those groups to intermingle. Virtually no aspect of his life would've been if it were up to conservatives.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

What we need is another Supreme Court Justice to blast conservatism as a threat to America.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"Progressivism hurts my deals with rich billionaires who bribe me" -Clarence Thomas.... probably

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago

And your bulldog wife, too.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

Remember Anita Hill.

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Someone should blast Clarence Thomas for being an actual threat to America

...in Minecraft

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

there's no need to specify minecraft. if the news outlet can describe criticism as "blasting" then so can you.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 67 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 77 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I think every American who comes across this article should read the whole thing. It's not long, and any reasonable person with a high school education will see he's talking nonsense.

Here are a few choice quotes and responses

Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence and hence our form of government

Our form of government's most basic premise is that it changes if people vote to change it. They can literally change everything about it.

A spirit of “cynicism, rejection, hostility and animus” toward America -- by Americans -- has taken hold, Thomas said in remarks carried live on CSPAN.

The founding fathers literally started a war of rebellion against their government. That's what that Declaration of Independence that Thomas mentioned was all about.

He said that the values enshrined in the 1776 Declaration of Independence have “fallen out of favor” among Americans -- a trend perpetrated, he argued, by “intellectuals” and the nation’s colleges and universities.

Those values aren't "enshrined". They're not even backed by the laws that our founding fathers ratified.

Thomas called on Americans to stand up for their principles and endure personal "sacrifices," if necessary, to preserve the nation's democracy.  

“In my view, we must find in ourselves that same level of courage that the signers of the Declaration have so that we can do for our future what they did for theirs,” he said.

Those people, with that document, started a war of rebellion against their government. They were willing to sacrifice their lives to rid themselves of tyranny. How can Thomas reference this and come to the exact opposite conclusion?

And to "preserve our democracy" can only mean one thing. To ensure that the will of the people becomes the law of the land without violating the Constitution or the rights given by it.

Anyone who wants to preserve our democracy has to be viciously opposed to Donald Trump, who's been trying to oppose the will of the American people and the Constitution.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Every time an erudite conservative throws out "animus" as a negative trait, I grow another pineal gland.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Thomas also said he believes many people no longer believe “all men are created equal” and deserving of “unalienable rights” protected by a limited government.

No, progressives actually believe we are all equal and that we possess inalienable rights. He's saying that we believe rights come from the government, but no, we believe the government must be forced to acknowledge and enforce our rights and to never treat certain groups as lesser.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Clarence Thomas and all magat trash conservatives are liars. They can't win an argument on the merits so they resort to ad hominems, dishonest cherry picking and outright lying. I fucking hate these people. Everything they do is in service to making themselves more money and giving themselves more power, they give a fuck about anything else

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The biggest violations of the constitution are in due process and illegal search from ice. Like the biggest to me in all of history really. They are not one offs but part of an executive administrations policy.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 6 points 15 hours ago

Of course, it's completely subjective what is the biggest violation. The constitution itself doesn't really make any distinction between which violation is worse, unless I am misremembering something.

If you're offended by a lack of due process and racism and that sort of thing, you might also find the Internment of Japanese Americans during WW2 similarly offensive. 2/3 of them were US citizens whose only "crime" was being ethnically Japanese. Or the infamous Trail of Tears.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 14 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

It's wild that he's referencing this document in opposition to those seeking to alter or abolish their government - believing it has become destructive of our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - in order to make it more likely to effect their safety and happiness. Progressives are acting in the spirit of those values which saw the American revolution take place by acting perfectly in line with what the Declaration of Independence clearly states is our right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Can't he just take his RV quietly into the night!?

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 6 hours ago

Can’t he just take his RV quietly into the night!?

John Oliver offered to buy him a $1 million RV to retire and he didn't, so....

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 13 hours ago

And not continue to take out his hate against everyone not a white, wealthy, Republican!?

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 16 hours ago

Okay! Let’s turn back the time to where he would have been a slave.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 95 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

“[Progressivism] holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God, but from government,” he said.

Because it's unequivocally true. Even if you believe your rights originate from God, unless or until God comes down and forms a state capable of enforcing those rights, they're meaningless.

“It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights.”

What a stupid thing to say. He's the one advocating for subservience, that is subservience to the supposed God who is supposedly the originator of our supposed rights.

That being said, I agree that we should not be subservient to the government. The government should be subservient to we, the people.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

"[O]ur rights and our dignities come not from God, but from government,” he said.

Hmm.

Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.

Ephesians 6:5

...and...

Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord.

Colossians 3:22

Is that the God you want to derive your rights from, Clarence?

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 21 points 19 hours ago (11 children)

Rights don’t come from government or god. The USA based their form of government on the idea of “natural rights.” These rights are inherent in human beings. They are the default.

We give the government the power to restrict those rights in order for everyone to get along and thrive. The government does not grant rights. We let the government restrict or strip those rights under certain circumstances.

I’ve never heard of progressivism denying natural rights.

He’s trying to put religion above the State. The State, in a democracy, is the people. Fucker wants a theocracy.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 48 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

A black man, repeat, BLACK MAN, is saying that progresivism is bad?

Does this idiot even know that the reason why he can have that job is because progresivism gave black people rights?

Fuck! We keep seeing studies linking low intellect with conservatism and we keep seeing imbeciles willing to prove them right...

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 23 points 20 hours ago

Look into his past, he was against interracial marriage until his own.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 153 points 1 day ago (1 children)

says the guy who sells his vote for yacht vacations

[–] Mister_Feeny@fedia.io 53 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Not even yacht vacations. RV vacations are enough for him.

Excuse you - they're Coach vacations thankyouverymuch.

RV's are for plebs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 40 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Corrupt judges are one of the biggest threats to America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

Which of those values include giving corporations "personhood"?

load more comments
view more: next ›