this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
582 points (99.8% liked)
News
37851 readers
1899 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
"This is the first I'm hearing of it."
"Never even met the guy, barely knew him."
- Trump probably
Okay, so he's in contempt of the law.
And? That's meaningless unless it's enforced.
Correct.
I first saw these comments here
Just before Trump started bombing Iran, there were reports of an Epstein Victim who had been interviewed by the FBI four times, during Trump's first term. After each interview, they would confirm more and more of her story, so they'd come back and get more info. Her testimony was accompanied by 10 photos.
She is one of the best documented victims, and her testimony could put people away for life. I had been hearing about her for weeks, but it seemed like I was seeing more and more reports about it, and it was about to break into the mainstream media...when Trump started bombing Iran, and Epstein slipped off the front page.
I saw a description of ONE of those photos, and it described her as a young teen, naked, semi-conscious, surrounded by several men, one doing something between her legs with an object. Blood was said to be in the scene. The victim testified that she thought she was going to die that night. That was only ONE of the photos.
Of course, those photos will never see the light of day because they are not just child sex images, they are violent, as well. They are easily the best evidence against those monsters, but it's also evidence that literally nobody can ever see, so their power is badly blunted.
It is important that verified descriptions of the these photos and videos be released, so we can truly understand what these psycho-pervoids were doing to these girls, and make MAGA losers understand that Epstein's parties weren't just naked teens carrying trays of drinks through parties of Sociopathic Oligarchs.
If we didn’t release it, it’s because it was not responsive to the law, and therefore not part of the Epstein files.… By law, we had to make certain redactions.…
What is he actually talking about? Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act that Trump signed into law. Some of the details:
- Mandated Release: Requires the DOJ to release, in a searchable format, all documents, flight logs, and investigative materials related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and declassifying them to the extent possible, if needed.
- Prohibited Redactions: No redactions, except a very narrow list of allowable reasons, and they have to justify each one with a separate report to Congress within 15 days.
- Prohibited Withholdings: No withholdings, except a very narrow list of allowable reasons, and they have to justify each one with a separate report to Congress within 15 days.
- Congressional Oversight: The DOJ must report to Congress with a list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named in the documents, without redaction of their names.
- No Personal Secrecy: The law explicitly prohibits withholding records due to embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.
NAL, but my understanding is they just... didn't follow it. Right!? I expected it to be long, but it's about 2 pages, and is refreshingly direct and no-nonsense. Here's the full law:
https://www.govinfo.gov/link/plaw/119/public/38
I know The Files are a salacious issue many of us are morbidly curious about... But there are very real victims being denied justice here as Trump's Justice Department simply chooses not to comply.
The major point you’re missing is that the regime does not fucking care and nobody is going to hold them accountable, ever.
load more comments
(1 replies)
And that seems like a clear cut cause for impeachment. If the Democrats gain control of the House a solid strategy would be to start impeachment proceedings against lower level appointees before going after Trump
He is "acting AG". Not even confirmed yet. The purpose of impeachment is to take an appointee from "confirmed" to "non-confirmed" status. I am not even sure impeachment would make sense? Couldn't Trump just make him acting AG immediately again?
He's the AG. This was a trick they pulled in the first term. You make a guy the "acting" head of the agency, and he does the job until the new guy gets appointed, and approved by the Senate.
So what happens if you name an "acting" head, and then never choose a final appointee? Nothing. Nothing happens. Your chosen guy remains the head of the agency, without ever being vetted or approved by the Senate.
Todd Flintstone is the new AG, for all ill tents and porpoises.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
Yeah, that a good plan.
I'm not so keen on replacing Trump with Vance/Theil. Trump can be better for us going into 2028, as long as we can keep him under control, and that will require getting rid of the sycophant loyalists, and making him pick a new crew, who won't get appointed unless he chooses people who will reign him in.
If we get rid of him, we give Vance 2 years to normalize MAGA, and make them viable for 2028. I'd rather have 2 more years of suppressed Trump chaos, to amp up the outrage going into Election Day 2028 - as long as we can keep him under control. Running his mouth can't hurt much, and it gives us lots of ammo to humiliate him with.
I wish I could say I was surprised. What a corrupt clown show
Arrest him
Kill him.
Shoot him and the rest of this dumbass administration.
I'm inches away from saying just execute all conservative politicians period.
load more comments
(1 replies)
waluigi.
Wa = Warehouse
Luigi = Health Insurance guy.
Waluigi = Health Insurance guy, but with a warehouse.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Arrest or just, like, whatever.
He'd grind up into a nice paste.
In this case, too, all those responsible will get off scot-free. This case demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that the U.S. legal system is so corrupt that it not only fails to serve its purpose but, on the contrary, is systematically exploited to enable the most serious crimes in the first place.
The Epstein case is just one particularly repugnant example of this, as the regime’s blatant enrichment through corruption and its countless crimes also make abundantly clear.
Nothing will change in this regard until U.S. citizens rise up and demand justice.
load more comments
(1 replies)
“Convicting me and throwing me in jail is now the sworn duty of every American!”
Wild how you can straight up not do your job and collect a paycheck if you work in the gov these days.
He's doing the job he was assigned to do. When it's not working, it's working.
load more comments
(1 replies)
So the pedophiles can start a new special island, if they haven't already. I bet they'll call it the "No Elon's Club" because they don't want Muskrat there, but they're allowed one.
What makes you think there was ever only one island?
There is nothing suggesting there aren't many others like Epstein. He's just one that got caught.
Ah, the clumsy scapegoat.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(18 replies)
Blatantly saying he's going to violate the law.
Well then he gets held in contempt
Contempt of Congress? This Congress?
Ha! Good one.
I’d rather contempt of angry mob
We already know Trump rapes kids, murders infants, and was heavily involved in human trafficking. If what we know isn't enough to take him out, he'll never be held to account.
can any American citizen become a Congressman or is it some vote by the inside only?
no, you need to secure between 10s of thousands and millions in campaign finances, the good will of corporate media, and support of the establishment political parties. exceptions are extremely rare
In theory? Yes. In practice? Only if you're already in a government social circle.
Which is obviously the reason he got the job
Welp, its not like by not releasing the files would be breaking any laws... that matter.
I mean he fired his personal lawyer in florida, for another one of his personal lawyers to act as AG. The epstien victims will never get justice from republican's, they HATE being held accountable for their actions. When they do get caught, they get angry and violent.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›