I did not know and now I am slightly angry at humans. Again.
this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
320 points (99.4% liked)
Flippanarchy
2407 readers
1127 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
We are monsters
We let the few dominate and exploit the many. Our relationship with nature is refelective of our relationship with ourself.
But the cultural focuson domination and exploitation is not biological. It's not in our nature. The potential to dominate is. But so is the potential of cooperation and mutual aid.
Let's try to rethink our society and behaviour to nature and each other and aim for the latter. For all our sake.
#GoogleBookchin
Wrote this on my replacement cardboard desk topper at work a few months ago. Good stuff.
Sweet
nice
I'd argue that neither one stems from the other but that they are both manifestations of the same thing: our desire to dominate our environment to make our own lives (or the lives of those important to us) easier and/or safer.
That's what billionaires who are exploiting the planet and the people want you to believe. They want you to think you are the problem. But if that were true, you could also fix it. Can you? No. Can the billionaires? YES.
They are the fucking monsters! Leeching off of others and giving nothing back. Fucking parasites that need to die in order to save the planet. Humans can live in peace with nature and have been for eons, until capitalism took rise.
Those billionaires didn’t portal into this world from another reality. Pick any human at random, make them a billionaire, chances are you have another worst-of-the-worst.
I’d guess fewer than 1/3 of people are “good” (even after being educated). The rest are just dangerously intelligent animals.
Pick any human at random, make them a billionaire, chances are you have another worst-of-the-worst.
Power corrupts. Our mistake is allowing power to be concentrated.
and which group are you in?
Nobody’s perfect, but if I had a billion dollars my sole preoccupation would be to spend it as fast and effectively as possible to help people in need. That one criterion alone — a kind of minimum requirement — unfortunately makes me weird. However, I stand by the claim that anyone who would do otherwise is a bad person.
To be clear, there is a wealth threshold (Maslow’s hierarchy of needs) that few people in the first world achieve, so we can hardly blame them for not donating their meager savings. But a billion dollars is utterly beyond the pale. Hence my example.
You all are happy enough to pay for this to happen with your consumption of fish
Food is not some luxury. People need to eat. If they don't eat fish they will eat something else.
You are implying that farming is more sustainable, but it's not. Over farming, over fishing, over anything is bad. And the only reason it happens is billionaire greed.
Stop blaming people who are barely making ends meet, living wage to wage and buying whatever food they can afford.
Most people can't afford to think about this kind of shit, but rich folk can.
Go kill a billionaire and make the world a better place for everyone.
Pls do not blame all of humanity for the actions of a few
I mean like 95% of us eat fish so 95% of us are partially to blame
I literally can't remember the last time I ate any fish whatsoever.
IDK the many allow the few to do what they want, if we all really tried we could have this over in a week. It doesn't even take everyone too, only like 3.5% of a population is required to overthrow a government.
I hate to break it to you, but nobody asked me what I wanted.
Defeating the government is the easy part. Building something new afterwards is where it gets difficult
Yeah, cuz then we know how to kill you too.
remember that guy who rams whalers with his ships front filled with concrete? he really wanted and he made a difference
If you want to know more and increase that anger a notch, here's Ocean With David Attenborough showing the devastation of bottom trawling: https://youtu.be/IzG9AwlypaY
Thank you, now I hate humans even more.
Slightly?
As the dominant species we should take better care of the world.
But, I guess shareholder value is more important.
Slightly?
"Fuck them dolphins"
- Humans
I think that gives me more thalassophobia than any animal I could find in open ocean.
Imagine getting caught in it
No. I don't think I will.
This is your daily reminder to carry a knife with you. Or a multitool, a Leatherman would do the trick.
Yeah, I'll be 30 meters deep in a trawling net half a kilometer long, manoeuver my way past the piling realize to the outer boundary, reach into my pocket and start sawing my way through inch thick reinforced cord until I make a hole big enough to wriggle through and swim to safety!
If you are 30 meters deep in the open ocean without a diving suit, diving knife (presumably sharpened), and an oxygen tank, idk what to tell you — don't do that in the first place?
I mean 30 meters laterally. End of net, 30 meters of fish & marine mammals & whatever else is caught in the net, me in the middle several meters from the edges, incoming tons of marine life to pack on top.
Honestly, having oxygen would make the terror of a prolonged death worse.
I don't think this would play out the way you're thinking. Regardless of the incorrect perception of the 30 meter depth, you would still need to be considerably deep to get caught in one of these nets. Again, if you're there without any tools and you're that deep, fuck man the only thing I can say is do not do that lol. There's a reason saws are very common on a variety of vessels, ocean or otherwise. Divers are definitely trained to carry cutting tools on them, I know I was taught to carry a dive knife and wire cutters — to be honest a saw doesn't sound ridiculous.
a Leatherman would do the trick
But enough about last night at the club!
this is illegal in many countries, you're only allowed to carry a knife if you have a specific legitimate use for it, like "i'm on the way to pick mushrooms"
Yeah I don't live in those countries
@A404 As an American, I can't understand any of these measurements without Statues of Liberty, football fields, or hamburgers
The statue of liberty is is 93 meters tall. One kilometer is 1000 meters. This supertawler is 10 times the size of the statue of liberty
"Okay but what is that in gumballs?"
-🐦
How many dachshunds is that?
Fuck that sea life, the shareholders must see a return!! /s
Yeah but we got the price of canned tuna way down!!! ~(until the inevitable scarcity and population decline hits)~
Where is Saddam?
Did they have to make the net bottle-nosed?