this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
9 points (66.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47680 readers
1207 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

so i know labels are overrated, some may say, and all that, but my sister thinks it's interesting to find out. it may change as she's a young teen, but she's never had a crush, as she says. in fact, as well, she's never had a sexual desire or libido, which my dad said is "abnormal as most teens are wanting to have sex", even though it's clearly ok to not want to and everyone is different.

i said she's probably aroace but i'm not too sure (i myself am a lesbian romantically on the ace spectrum). today, she said if a guy were to flirt with her or be/do something generally what people who like men would consider attractive, she wouldn't find it attractive, though she does find guy singers and actors hot. however, she saw a girl wearing attractive clothing recently and found her really pretty and attractive, though she wouldn't date her.

she says she would be happy to date someone without doing romantic things and isn't interested in kissing, but anything beyond a platonic life partner situation is a no for her. one of my partners (i'm poly) is a platonic partner (masc nb), and they felt the same way, no kissing but a platonic life partner situation is ok, and they're aroace, so i told her it was very similar to them. again, she has never felt romantic or sexual attraction towards someone, and while she does appreciate their beauty, she doesn't wanna date them or anything like that and is only ok with a platonic life partner situation without doing romantic things like kissing.

is aroace a good term? we're trying to help her figure out her sexuality and you can't say for sure, but there could be a good starting point.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe just let her tell you, and leave her alone about it.

she told me to ask people if she was

[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Based on information provided, aroace is a functional descriptor.

That being said early teens is a highly transformational time for people. Some change would not be unexpected.

[–] rebeccapatriciastar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel obligated to point out that while the label fits, it shouldn't be a defining personality point.

People often get caught with labels they put there themselves or they were given by others. It's important to be separate enough from them that you are not constrained by them. If they care enough about finding a label to fit for now, I hope they will continue checking in with themselves on occasion to check if the label still fits.

Much like the feeling of 'if people are going to call me a villain, I might as well be a villain'. It happens (sometimes quite subtly) for most labels people choose to live by.

that makes sense, i will definitely tell her that. i always check in with myself, as im quite self-aware, like i was bi before but realized it didn't fit and stopped "forcing" myself to like men

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's not abnormal for teen girls, though. A lot of girls need to meet the right person before they develop sexual interest, even into their 20s. Instead of speculating and looking at people, she should try talking to them, making plans, going out. Does not need to be romantic, just meeting different people and seeing what kind of people you get along well with. Although modern American society really doesn't allow kids to do that until college now.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hot take - the recent surge in aromantic and asexual people is more a result of increasing levels of anxiety in society, rather than being driven by inherent personality traits. While some people doubtless have greater or lesser innate sexual or romantic drives, the increase we are seeing, especially in young people, is due repression of sexual or romantic desires in their psyche due to social anxieties around being vulnerable and comminicative with others.

Hypothesis - take 100 asexual, aromantic teens and put them on a desert island where they don't have much to do except fish, poke the fire, and lounge on the beach in swim suits. After a year, 90 of them will no longer be aroace.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

She's a young teen. Maybe she's aroace, maybe she's a late bloomer

[–] Klarinette245@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

for now, aroace

[–] wendyz7@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, I'd say ace spectrum

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck is an "aroace?*

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net -4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

as in she smells funny ???? what has her aroma have to do with her sexuality ? a yeast infection?

[–] Klarinette245@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

aromantic, not aromatic. a (not) + romantic

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No, it's due to having 4n + 2 delocalized electrons and a coplanar structure.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio -2 points 3 days ago

I swear, they're just making shit up now.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Slartibartfass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Far too few categories, labels, and abbreviations