this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
419 points (98.4% liked)

linuxmemes

31343 readers
847 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 135 points 4 weeks ago (16 children)

    Because why go for native performance when you can go for minimum effort on all platforms.

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 66 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

    When all you have is ~~a hammer~~ JavaScript, everything looks like a ~~nail~~ web page.

    Kids these days don't bother learning languages that actually compile to native apps.

    [–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 47 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    All of my degree was in C, C++, C#, Java, etc. and the one class I had that did web applications did Java backends and middleware with PHP frontends. It wasn’t until I got into the industry that I had to learn Angular, Electron, React, Django, etc.

    I don’t think it’s the devs making these decisions.

    [–] AnExerciseInFalling@programming.dev 20 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

    It's the minimum effort that translates to minimum time that translates to minimum cost for the business. Why hire another developer for a mobile app (or another platform) when you could just have the same web dev write it. Or without hiring another dev, why have the same dev need to build up tooling in another language when you can just reuse from the existing platform

    [–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago

    Exactly, that and the “we are a [insert product name here] shop” mentality. The things I have had to fight for over the years are mind boggling.

    [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

    It is the devs. Management says they need it fast then the devs say "fuck you here's your browser tab app".

    I deam of a dev job that would let me actually write a good app..

    [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago

    To add insult to injury, the demands are often really unclear. Changing something in an electron app is often pretty straight forward. Not so much in a C# or especially C++ app

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Because you want a cross platform solution?

    I get that electron can be slow, bloated, etc, but the amount of ire it draws is overboard.

    [–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yes but sometimes, for example core parts of windows 11 like the start menu, don't need to be cross platform and should be native, not a pwa

    [–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

    Especially since they had already native code in previous windows...

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

    Lol I mean I would never use windows 11 or defend that use of it. I'm just saying a valid use of electron is to target multiple platforms with minimal development hurdles.

    [–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

    Having built applications with Microsoft's mfc, Java's swing, the omnipresent Qt, and whatever nastiness Mac was using in the early 00's, electron is worth the silliness. Trust me. Trust me.

    [–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Reminder to talk to your doctor about a colonoscopy

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

    the omnipresent Qt

    So weird. I spent more than two years of my career working on a Qt app (not by choice) but I've never met another human being who has ever even heard of Qt. Nothing else has ever made me so certain that I'm clinically insane.

    My favorite thing about Qt was the use of C++ for the back end and Javascript for the UI layer. It lets companies take advantage of the, uh, four people in the world who are good with both languages.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Because different OSes follow different Human Interaction Guidelines and I expect that applications follow the native look and feel.

    [–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 weeks ago

    following every linux de/wm's interaction guidelines seems pretty hard

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

    Electron is broken in implementation

    We need something like React native for desktop

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] uuj8za@piefed.social 36 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

    I know it's easy to dunk on Electron... but have any of yall written any desktop apps with native frameworks? I wrote a small GTK4+Vala app once and I discovered desktop frameworks are very different than developing webapps. Customizing the look, feel, interaction of elements, and general mechanics, seems like a toooon of effort. (It kinda seems like you're not supposed to customize it.) Web development is waaaaaaaay more friendly towards customization. Which as a company, you want your app to look like your company, not some generic OS bundled app.

    And then you have to repeat all that effort for crappleOS and Wangblows?... And then you gotta hope that it's even possible to do the thing you want in different OSes. Sheesh.

    I mean, I'd be happy if everything was native apps, but I also understand why people don't tend to choose that route.

    [–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 29 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

    That's kind of the point of the frameworks though? Electron apps suck not only because of resource footprint, they don't look and feel native, if they have any accessibility it's usually custom and different for every program. Too much customization is bad.

    I remember the times before UI toolkits took over. These programs had soul and were beautiful in their own way, but you had to learn how UI elements worked in each of them separately. The same thing happens with web apps now. Tab and the other usual keyboard shortcuts rarely work, controls are all custom.

    X-Copy-Probably-the-most-popular-Amiga-program-ever-Amiga-news-commodore-news-piracy-on-the-80s-and-90s-2334938446

    dpaint01-1293592928

    a5003-crop-2302041451-01

    [–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

    100%, but man these are making me nostalgic.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 27 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

    Once upon a time, we differentiated our apps based on their capabilities and gave them a consistent interface so people who knew how to use Windows|Linux|MacOS apps would already be familiar with how they operated. Now we differentiate on looks/user experience, and many of them arent capable at all.

    [–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

    People took the wrong lessons from beautiful GUI design. Anyone who felt it was just aesthetics missed the point. It wasn’t just flashy UI on what boils down to a database.

    [–] chunes@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

    Which as a company, you want your app to look like your company, not some generic OS bundled app

    Consistency of UI used to be treasured.

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

    Customizing the look, feel, interaction of elements, and general mechanics, seems like a toooon of effort. (It kinda seems like you’re not supposed to customize it.)

    Holy shit, he figured it out!

    So yeah, it turns out that platform human interface guidelines are a thing, and for good reason.

    [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 6 points 4 weeks ago

    Sorry but the window real estate of an application isn't meant for branding and advertisement. For that you have splash screens and the about dialogue, or even the help pages. And for more branding your webpage.

    Customizing the look, feel, interaction of elements, and general mechanics, seems like a toooon of effort. (It kinda seems like you’re not supposed to customize it.)

    Sometimes all of this is there for a reason. I used to really hate standard Windows (and I still do) but it had one big advantage: everything was accessible, in the sense that it all worked very well for blind and vision-impaired people. Usually when people create their own custom look and feel etc. they never accommodate accessibility at all.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 27 points 4 weeks ago

    This edit is really well done.

    [–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    Everyone should have to make one native app before being allowed to make fun of electron/webviews.

    [–] ooterness@lemmy.world 45 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Counterpoint: Every developer should have to test their app on a machine with 1 GB of RAM and a dialup modem before inflicting their bloat on the rest of the world.

    [–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 21 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

    I just tried doing some work on a convention center WiFi connection in a small town. And it was clear the software I was using had no concept of slow internet. No progress bars on downloads, no resuming when connections dropped.

    Everything just assumes max performance and fast network.

    works on my machine

    I remember some years ago when a version of MSDN came out that had clearly been developed entirely on enormously wide monitors. Despite word-wrapping being a problem that the programming world solved many decades ago, this version of MSDN had completely fucked it up and you could only read it on a normal laptop screen by scrolling left and right with the horizontal scroll bar for every line. I spent months copying every article I needed to read into Notepad.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] webkitten@piefed.social 13 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    What are you talking about? I love having five apps all download the same 20mb node libraries each running their own Chrome sandbox processes all because they can't share them amongst themselves.

    [–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
    [–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 weeks ago (17 children)

    I get that it sucks. Are there any alternatives, where I have one codebase for all platforms?

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

    It depends on what you are trying to do

    Qt isn't bad and runs cross platform

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Lol, this is funny

    [–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Meanwhile, I have to install my third freedesktop 1GB dependency for 4 flatpak apps. What I wouldn't give for a slim 100mb electron package... All my electron apps as appimages are less than 1gb total.

    But hey, at least native apps are so much faster. I have to get out an atomic clock to really see those microseconds that Zed is saving me compared to VSCode. You can even use the extra battery you gain to do one extra Rust compilation from scratch!

    load more comments
    view more: next ›