this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
227 points (96.3% liked)

politics

29349 readers
1551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A former staffer of Rep. Eric Swalwell, a leading Democratic candidate for California governor, says that the congressman raped her when she was heavily intoxicated and left her bruised and bleeding, an allegation Swalwell strongly denies.

“I was pushing him off of me, saying no,” the woman told CNN of the incident, which she said happened in 2024 after she had stopped working in Swalwell’s office. “He didn’t stop.”

She said it was the second time Swalwell had nonconsensual sexual contact with her while she was drunk. In 2019, when she was still working for him, she said she woke up naked with him in a hotel room after a night of heavy drinking. She said she had no memory of what happened but could feel physically that they’d had sexual contact.

Three other women who spoke with CNN also alleged various kinds of sexual misconduct by the Democratic congressman – including Swalwell sending them unsolicited explicit messages or nude photos.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

The letters said the women’s claims were “undermined” by their “voluntary and cooperative relationship with Mr. Swalwell over the course of many years” following the alleged incidents, including the former staffer asking him for job references.

Translated: "She didn't fight back or leave her job so it can't possibly be rape or sexual harassment."

These fucks just use the same lines constantly.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What the hell, other countries has phd level members in the government roles. While the us has charisma and charm to sway voters..

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

It's not even charisma or charm. Its just fuckloads of money in propaganda.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Life is not meant to be a 90's frat movie, fellas.

[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

Didn't he run for the presidential nomination in a primary? I am surprised these allegations did not come up then when for all purposes, he had a higher national profile.

[–] AmbientDread@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he was a Republican he could run for President now and probably win.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe that's the next strategy for Dems to try to win over Republicans

Are we really surprised? This is the dipshit that suggests using nukes on people refusing gun buybacks

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

So, maybe now one of the dems will finally start to poll over 20% and CA won’t be looking at a general election with two republicans l?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For nearly 20 years, I have served the public – as a prosecutor and a congressman and have always protected women. I will defend myself with the facts and where necessary bring legal action. My focus in the coming days is to be with my wife and children and defend our decades of service against these lies.

Okay, I've only just now read one article and haven't fully formed an opinion yet (seems quite plausible given four independent allegations with corroborating evidence), but for right now, roping your children (seemingly all under 13 judging by a photo) into "our work" a real bitch move that he has to know he was doing as a congressperson and former prosecutor. He mentions no other person – even if he could be implicitly referring to people who work with him, he has to know given a prepared statement that this is an association that sentence creates. (But even then, it's a bitch move to invoke other people into allegations solely against him.)

Aside: Can bad shit please stop happening? Could Swalwell seriously not have allegedly done this? Really, if that's true, man? Because it seems pretty true??

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

He has some PAC backing him funded by dialysis clinics and other questionable entities. That and AiPAC money means he was never a choice for me.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Feed him to the Joshua Trees. They are thirsty.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Oh we've been burning those for a while now

Didn't realize I could like him less than when he was just banging Chinese spies but here we are.

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Matt Mahan is the best Democratic candidate for governor. He will pull votes away from the Republican candidate.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why the fuck would anyone care about that?

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because people are used to needing to do it at þe national level? Because conservative strategy for þe past half decade is, when þey can't win, to at least shift þe center to þe right?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just want you to know, I'm downvoting you for your thorns, not your opinion.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I thought Thorns was supposed to harm one's opponent when they attack, yet you didn't get any downvotes after downvoting the person with Thorns.