this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
175 points (94.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39053 readers
1655 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By all rights, this should be something I am deeply passionate about. I've been in tech/engineering my entire adult life and was obsessed with NASA as a kid. I even live on the east coast of Florida and can sometimes see the launches/landings over the ocean. But I just... don't care at all. I'm not suffering from depression or any other malaise, and generally things are fine. But I haven't clicked on a single link or looked at a single image. I know this has not been the case for many, many people, so I'm wondering what might be different about this launch (or really the whole program in general), and curious if anyone else has found themselves feeling the same.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alexquiniou@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 minutes ago

So much problems to get mad about. Don't have time to be happy for some people so far away. We are try to survive everday.

Here are the reason.

[–] EverXIII@lemmy.world 0 points 33 minutes ago

You are not alone. What a waste of resources.

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

For me, I just don’t see it as the step towards a bright future that it cone was.

So we reinvigorate the world’s interest in space missions, then what? Every iota of evidence from our own planet tells us that businesses are going to own the moon, mars, and beyond. Wayland-Yutani is more likely than The Federation.

I just can’t get excited about another frontier for Musk and Bezos to rub their stanky dicks all over.

[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You already know the answer. It's because they didn't land.

Orbiting the moon - super cool. Seeing new stuff from far side - super cool. Emotional investment in something we've more or less done before? Well....

Which is actually a damn shame, but brains are funny like that. The entirety of human progress (and hubris) is down to chasing the next dopamine hit - and that probably includes the original moon shot.

Artemis is asking you to feel the same thing twice. Your lizard brain isn't stupid - it's just honest and lazy. If novelty is the drug, then this isn't a new drug. It's a carefully rebranded rerun with better CGI and a press kit. Plus, you've probably had a lot of other proxy hits to the ol' reward center so that something as big as "humans in a tin can fly around the moon" just registers as "meh - I've seen better on For All Mankind".

And I hate that for us.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

it would be more notable if another country went to moon instead of the US, although not interesting still. moon is OLD NEWS sadly and coming out at the same time as other stuff on earth.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't care because it doesn't seem like a genuine mission to prove something. It feels like a purely political stunt. At least with the original mission, it was breaking a frontier on top of trying ot show off to Russia during the Cold War, but this time it's only the US flexing as mandated by the Orangegutan in Charge because he can and it feels icky.

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

His name is forever going to be associated with this too. Tainted like our lives have been with his toxicity forever

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Honestly, I thought for sure we would have had a permanent moon base by now. Something minimal but permanent and manned like the Space Station is. How foolish of me.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel oddly similar. I think it's that I can't cheer for America.

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We should have gone to mars by now, but all the funds went to child raping fascists and bombs apparently

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

i dont think we are technologically there to get to the mars even with money, probably a few more decades of funding and research.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Yep. But that's the thing, we could've been there if we didn't spend the resources necessary for it on stupid things the last ~5 decades.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's all that hot what's being done in contrast to what has already been achieved decades ago.

So, once around the moon, Hm.

On the other hand, stuff others already said. There's so much stuff going in, imo the effort could be used in other places.

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Did you hear about that boat that recently made it to Antarctica? Yeah, me neither.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

I don't care about it because it's a NASA mission and I've noticed that anything American these days makes me nauseous.

Call me anything you like, I don't care, this is how o feel after years of america bullshit and decades of more murrica bullshit with their preprogrammed exceptionalism.

I look down upon them, I pity them at best

And then there is something as great as this and I just can help but feel like it's tainted somehow. I know it's an international collaboration, but still, the smell somehow remains

I'm sorry, but fuck, so much misery and death and suffering has been brought to the world by the US for so long already... Trump is just the next iteration taking this place to its natural conclusion. Of course trump is corrupt, the country has been through and through corrupt for decades. This is just a typical self absorbed American grabbing the chance geven to get me myself and I to the top.

So yeah, mixed feelings at best.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago

Personally, for me, I've paid attention to it some, but not followed it closely. I think a lot of it is just that I understand it so well and have seen it all before. I love KSP (and KSA is looking great!), and have played it with the real solar system mods. The launch looks better than the game, but everything after the game does better. It can look better (their renders are surprisingly shit still), and I can actually control it.

I love space information and technology, but this is just one more step in it. I can't follow everything. It's great that it's happening, but there's also a ton more research being done that I don't even know about. This, while impressive and good, isn't something new.

I watched the launch after it happened at 2x speed and saw some parts of the descent. My phone wallpaper has been set t9 pictures they took. I'm just not that interested in following it live. I know what to expect, and I'll hear about it if anything unexpected happens.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I should be way more excited, but the current administration has ruined everything. NASA is too focused on creating a moon base which is dumb as shit. Let's try and save earth before jumping ship to another planet.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 23 hours ago

same, i think thats why its not interesting, the WHITE house has created so many distractions that the nasa isnt even that noticable, just a temporarly headlines that would be instantly forgotten in a few days.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

NASA is too focused on creating a moon base which is dumb as shit.

Why dumb?

Even if you want a Mars base eventually, it seems like a good idea to get some practice building a similar moon base first. Many of the problems will be the same, but it will be much easier, cheaper, and safer to learn them in a place which is only days away from resupply.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah I’d argue time is actually the most expensive thing for a mars mission. And that’s going to require a hell of a lot of mission time nobody knows how to do yet. We get a head start on it now, getting a working lifter series in production and a functioning commercial lander and habitation scene and you’ll have a much better mars mission. I think the view of mars or bust asap asap comes from a lack of understanding of how big the technical leap is from doing a moon to doing a mars mission.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 123 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's been overshadowed by other current events. Quite a shame, really

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That goddamn scandal. The persecution of minorities and the warmongering. The socio-political climate now is far worse compared to the Apollo missions then conducted at the time the US government was unpopular mainly because of the Vietnam War.

The arguments against Artemis aren't surprising as these also mirror the skepticism towards the Apollo program.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 74 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's more than that. The thought of us doing something incredible like establishing a permanent moon base feels more depressing than inspiring these days because enshitification will be baked into it right from the planning stages

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

If the Untied States manages to survive the mess it is in, it will probably declare ownership of the moon and declare anyone else who manages to land there illegal aliens....including actual aliens

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have become very cynical of tech over the past several years and am strongly opposed to any sort of space colonization.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 10 points 1 day ago

Me to. Theres a podcast called "tech won't save us" that i hate listening to because it reminds me how much we have lost.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Class warfare will be the foundation it's all built on. Any tech developed for the moon, Mars, whatever - anything we gain in knowledge in return - is going to go to benefit rich fuckers, not you. One day there will be more space tourists. Rich people, not you. Maybe one day Man will even colonize another world. Rich people, not you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atropa@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Epstein files ?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm finding it hard to be happy about any of the positives coming from the US government these days. A couple of bright spots don't really outshine the depressing everything else.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The "positives" don't usually translate to any sort of benefit for the average person. Yes, I am aware that there are exceptions to this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think actually watching some of the video would help with that. I watched some video of events while they were up there, what they were feeling and how much they obviously cared about each other and what they were doing.

Tonight I watched the splashdown and felt unexpectedly emotional about it, not sure whether it was contemplating the enormity of the achievement, or the display of the good and smart and positive side of humans working together to do something big again instead of the constant drumbeat of destruction, or maybe just that we didn't have yet another disaster.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

for me, it’s the fact that it’s being used as a political tool by the usa to broadcast their prowess, that it’s being presented as a hopeful look in the future all the while the country running this is bombing and murdering hundreds of thousands, and that the companies benefitting from artemis’s publicity are mostly "defense" contractors like spacex and lockheed-martin, aka again the same people doing all the genocide

it’s hard to feel excited about it even tho there is plenty of cool science being done, that cool science stands on a mountain of tragedy and horrors

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I think you’re asking a question only you can answer

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago

It's hard to be excited about going to space when you can't afford to exist on earth.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In all honesty at this stage it's not that exciting. They're hyping up people going further from the earth than ever before, which is technically true, but astronauts have orbited the moon before just not quite as far in absolute distance.

So this is mostly doing something done before in the 70s. Rocket launches, grainy images of the moon from close up, photos of earth from near the moon and astronauts floating in zero G isn't new.

I don't blame you for not getting excited to watch long videos where not a lot happens very slowly, or reading press coverage which is brutally honest largely fluff.

The ultimate goal is exciting, but that doesn't mean every step on the way is exciting. I suspect the first moon landing will be of more interest, then the next one will not be, even though the landings are a stepping stone to Mars.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean it's cool and I love space exploration, but at the same time, it's something that has been done a while ago already, so it's not that impressive. Now if they went around Mars or did something nobody did before, that would be something else. As it is it seems a bit superfluous to the phillistine that I am. I actually don't know what the point of the mission was, I don't think major media mentioned it (or I missed it).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Because you can see it for the distraction that it is. In a vacuum it is a wonderful or at least interesting and significant thing but it is also clear that it's just a PR stunt by the US government.

That's not to belittle the training, dedication, preparation, and everything else that was done by all of the people around adjacent to or even inside the rocket. The indictment is not on them.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

same here, i dont care about it all, while its interesting it finally happened, its not really exciting news, especially with so much other things going on, which suspiciously happening a the same time to direct attention away , the mission redirecting attention away from more important news.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I love space and discovery. I also dont super care about this because what is even the point of it? We did a fly around of a rock in our backyard we know super well already. Give me more JWST, not this

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah, but the point is to test the technology which will eventually get people back onto the moon, set up permanent off-Earth habitation, etc. Which in turn will/could be part of future steps for further-reaching exploration. I still think it has value as a building block.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

for me its not only the glacier pace of progress.. its also the lack of scientific motivation.

this didnt happen for science... its a political tool

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It's because it's not a sexy mission. The astronauts never leave the ship, they're not landing anywhere, they're not doing anything that hasn't been done before, and the trip is only precursor for the cool stuff that's yet to come. Nobody remembers the space missions before the first moon landing, and nobody will remember this either.

The explicit goal of this mission is to not just to send people back to the moon, but to actually set up a base there, and that's exciting stuff. When there is an actual moon base and scientists can travel back and forth from earth to it, the entire world will focus on it because that's never been done before.

[–] MercuryGenisus@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I feel the same apathetic "whatever" response. I love rockets. I love space. I struggle to care about this.

The program is almost 2 decades late and using recycled technology. It is literally using spare parts from the shuttle. I don't believe it will ever actually get to the boots on the ground phase. I am actually surprised they made it to this mission. After all the boondoggle from Boeing I really thought it would die a quiet death somewhere out of sight.

Not only do they have technical hurdles, we have seen normally safe agencies become political battle grounds. We see science becoming less and less important at every level of society. We are living through Idiocracy and they still act like we are the same country that went to the moon the last time.

If we see people on the moon in our lifetime I don't believe they will arrive on a NASA mission.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 11 points 1 day ago

OP is Neo at dinner wondering why his steak isn't fulfilling.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I don’t like it way Elon Musk fans gush over everything Space X does… but I am excited that even with an administration and voter base that are clearly hostile to science, we can still DO science. So even though it’s not what I’d rather them do, they’re still doing science.

load more comments
view more: next ›