this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
26 points (90.6% liked)

UK Politics

5428 readers
152 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a loss, it's one discretionary spending option that's not there anymore.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 32 minutes ago

Unless it was anticipated to bring significant visitors from outside the metropolis.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's absolutely not a hit to the economy in any way. Money not spent at a festival doesn't evaporate into thin air. People simply spend that money on other, similar things.

Plus the festival is organised by Live Nation Concerts, an American company, with tickets sold through Ticket Master, another American company (also owned by the same parent company Live Nation Inc) so the vast majority of the money spent at the festival wouldn't end up in the UK economy in the first place.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 31 minutes ago

Merch? Overpriced drinks and food? Accommodation? Transport? Visits to other attractions while in London?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I guess if you put yourself in a position to be that dependent on an idiot like Kanye, you don't really deserve that money anyway.

[–] spagbolioli@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

I'm sure London will cope somehow

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why they canceled the entire festival?

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because he was headlining all 3 days. There is not a chance of getting 3 acts of similar clout to play at this short notice. At which point the event is far enough from what was advertised that they'd have to give refunds to the shitload of angry customers demanding them. Better to just cancel now.

[–] AckPhttt@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

Also it was speculated elsewhere that Kanye may get paid (by contract) if the festival happens, but not if the festival as a whole is canceled. It's speculative, but reasonable to assume Kanye had strong contract guarantees.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I know they canceled the festival, but why? They could easily hire someone else and move on

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 25 minutes ago

“Easily”? Not really.

The UK and European summer festival circuit is highly competitive. Those high-profile acts willing to do festival appearances (many aren’t) book years in advance.

Those who aren’t committed to the dates in question may have signed exclusivity window deals with other festivals precluding their appearance anywhere else.

The PR of being second-choice to a literal nazi isn’t something that gets agents beating down the promoter’s door.

Given the sunk costs involved, if they thought they could line up a replacement tjey would have.

[–] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was billed as a festival but really it was Kanye and a few other acts.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 day ago

That makes sense.

[–] samc@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe they had an insurance policy for if a headliner couldn't attend? In that case definitely easier for the organisers to just cancel and claim

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 day ago

That's a "no show" insurance, maybe they had a clause for canceling everything if Kayne couldn't act

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

maybe it makes a bigger statement and gets more headlines for the organisers this way.