this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
744 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11229 readers
1672 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 56 points 3 days ago (34 children)

Author here, I don't give a fuck, as long as the book was bought/is read. Stop fetishizing books or start fucking them. 

I do wonder why this person wouldn't just use a e-ink reader, though.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I do wonder why this person wouldn't just use a e-ink reader

The batteries would explode, duh /s

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

I feel like there is a lack of understanding how or what about e-ink. My partner only grasped the concept that it's not an emmisive display after the 5th time explaining. And some friends still don't seem to understand the difference between an e-reader and tablet. (they are extremely tech-illiterate)

If I extrapolate this, there have to be a lot of people who don't want an e-reader because 'they don't want to look at a screen'.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

E-ink readers are too hard to cut.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 209 points 4 days ago
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 169 points 4 days ago (6 children)

There's no objective reason that this is wrong, but still, take that shit far far away from me

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 127 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Doesn't it fuck up the binding? Sure, a softback is still going to stay together in the immediate term, but the covers are almost always a single stronger piece, whereas the pages will now be free to work loose from the cut side.

So... I'd say it is objectively worse.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BluePea@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

YOU AWFUL PSYCHO, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, THEY WERE SO YOUNG !!!?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

In all honesty, in no way sarcastically, I consider this a war crime.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Imean paperbacks are cheap and would also probably do this on their own in due time anyway. If he was doing this to hardcovers I'd see it as a bit of an issue.

[–] Dry_Monk@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

"yeah, I just finished Infinite. It was pretty good, abrupt ending though. I hear Jest picks up right where it left off."

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Skip jail. Straight to a firing squad of librarians.

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Easy to spot, they're the only firing squad with silencers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naich@piefed.world 112 points 4 days ago

That psychopath needs reporting to the police.

[–] Overspark@piefed.social 88 points 4 days ago (7 children)

That's just wrong. If you're worried about portability get an e-reader, don't butcher up works of art.

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 111 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

I think most e-readers will stop working if you cut them in half to be more portable. Books still have the upper hand on this

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I mean, if you had like a hand bound copy or rare out of print book or something like that this sentiment makes sense, but if it's just some abundant mass produced edition, I'm not so sure. Surely the artistry there is in the words, which aren't damaged and exist in other copies anyway, rather than the cheap machine made physical medium.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pianoplant@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Clearly this is someone who actually reads their books. Given that they are mass market paperbacks... I have no problem with this. If I were an author I would much rather someone does this to my work and actually reads it and enjoys it to someone keeping a pristine copy unopened on their shelf forever.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I cut mine cross-wise to save space. There is a lot of authors who make no sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] confused_polarbear@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

Rick Steves actually recommends people to do this with his travel guides

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

My grandfather used to do this but for every chapter because his wrists were too weak to hold on to a full sized book for too long.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Soft cover, cheap books that'll probably never be significantly useful for collectors, I guess. You start tearing apart tomes and older works though and that's a line.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I once tried that with my copy of the necronomicon, I ended up blacking out for a few months. When my consciousness came back, everyone was talking about a lockdown and surving a plague... Not sure if that's related. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I love destroying the books I read. I buy ancient paperbacks used and choose not to care about their well-being, storing them in my pocket until the wheels fall off. When I read Dracula my book had no front or back cover and I kept the last 15 or so pages tucked in loose in the middle of the book because they would fall off every time I cracked it open.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 23 points 3 days ago

You should cut diagonally. If it makes a sandwich better, imagine what it can do for a novel.

[–] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago

As someone who would never, ever do this to one of my beloved collection: Go for it. Watever keeps you enjoying them. As others have said, we're not talking hundred year old first edition hardcovers here. You can still tape them up and pass them on, unlike those philistines who take one on a hike and rip out the pages they've read to use for campfire tinder.

[–] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (8 children)

this is so wrong.

you're supposed to cut them in half so you can fit each side in the pockets of your cargo shorts.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I shred my books to save time reading

I don't even like it when they destroy books to scan them by cutting off their spines. I prefer when they use scanning methods that preserve the books as well as possible. This feels just straight up evil.

[–] username_1@programming.dev 33 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Deport him to... away. Far far away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

I have never been so offended by something so harmless in the greater scheme of things.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's a mass-produced book, and a paperback at that. You can certainly keep any such book in good condition to archive or re-read on your own terms. But that stack of acid-paper and cheap glue is going to eventually self-destruct. Unless it's a limited production run, in danger of getting burned, autographed, is an actual collectable, or something else that makes it distinct or valuable, I say: go for it.

Source: I own a stack of these from back in the day. Despite my best efforts to store them appropriately, they're all slowly rotting away. Some things just aren't meant to last.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xylian@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I shred the binding side with a saw, so I can scan the book with my Fujitsu scanner. Easy way to digitalize a entire book.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 3 days ago

You could just go to IRCHighway, though.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This guy works at Anthropic

[–] Xylian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I only digitalize manga and share it with friends. It is expensive in Germany. It is legal here btw it is called private copy ownership.

[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

They do this for you in Korea. A lot of long novels are released chopped up into ~200 page chunks.

load more comments
view more: next ›