this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
138 points (87.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2998 readers
473 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xkbx@startrek.website 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ah, system with produces it, my favourite duo

[–] Ttangko@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

~~with~~ which

A typo, I believe

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Fair. There are eleven entirely separate words on the page, after all.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was the USSR under Stalin facist?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you attempting to construct a straw man?

[–] showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So what’s the answer? We can complain about people not doing what you want, but what do you suggest?

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

We could stop the money printing that debases salaries and encourages massive debt accumulation that eventually leads to collapse?

Imagine if you didn't need a raise and your wage went up with technological advancement and efficiency gains, where your employer had to cut your salary every year for inflation adjustment.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

But my capitalist indoctrination said that not shoveling cash at the wealthy is what caused the Great Depression! Everybody knows that!

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

How else could we financialize everything, building a wall of debt in front of inelastic goods like housing, forcing people to take on a lifetime of debt so the rich can attain more wealth on the backs of the poor.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

did you not look at the image?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its not what I want, there is an effective way to protest and then theres these no kings echo chamber parades.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Genuine question - what makes the No Kings protests ineffective (and not in a sense of "this won't overthrow the oligarchy" but in a sense of "this doesn't help at all"?)

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They have no demands or consequences laid out if those demands are not met, they have no clearly outlined goals or mission. A 3 hour event every few months isn't inconveniencing any of the power structure or a threat to the status quo. Their ridiculously proposed 1 day general strike on May 1 will do nothing either as people will shift their purchases to another day. Anything other than a prolonged protest and general strike, with clear demands and goals, nothing will be accomplished.

It's a pressure release value to prevent an actual uprising

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

I don't know, calling for a general strike on May 1 seems pretty big.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

The fact they only happen a couple times a year for a single day and only on weekends makes them pretty damn ineffective.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, being ineffective is the default. Something needs to be somehow exceptional to be effective (or we wouldn't need to do anything at all). It's like medicine; when someone suggests a treatment to a disease we expect them to prove that it works before we debate its usefulness. So in that vein, what kind of effect should we expect the sixth round of No Kings to have?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Same as every other round: getting people who are vocally against the situation together in one place so they can connect. The protest isn't the end goal, the protest is a networking opportunity.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Okay there are three problems with this:

  1. It's not being sold as that; it's being sold as actual resistance against the Trump regime.

  2. There's a fundamental limit on the effectiveness of this, since there's a limited number of people who are vocally against the situation and willing to do something about it. One would expect this limit to be reached by the fifth time, meaning the time is ripe for a change in strategy.

  3. When are we going to see the effects of the last five rounds? For the most part the level of resistance has stayed the same for the last 9 or so months outside of maybe Minneapolis, and the determining factor was ICE presence more than anything else. There's just no evidence that No Kings has really done anything.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

They are effective in hijacking and sheepdogging.
Make sure they can vent and sublimate their anger in a non-threathening way by having their Sunday walks with edgy signs.
And mostly that they do nothing else and wait only a few years when they can finally have their crushing revenge by voting for the next 'leftist' corporate dem.
Surely this time it will be different.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago
  1. Says who? Your interpretation of it as such is your own business. And even if it were "sold" as such, that does not diminish the real value of networking.

  2. Says who? Each event is a new opportunity for new people to join, it's a new opportunity for repeat attendees to meet even more of each other.

  3. I personally know several people who have become more involved in various direct action groups as an immediate consequence of going to these rallies. Just because you personally aren't seeing the result doesn't mean it isn't happening.