this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
520 points (100.0% liked)

You Should Know

45107 readers
999 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you go to uBlock Origin's settings and then select 'Filter lists', there's a list maintained by EasyList and another by AdGuard that both block cookie notices. To my understanding, this isn't enabled by default (at least it wasn't when I installed uBO).

Apologies if this is common knowledge; I didn't know about it until recently.


Why YSK: Cookie consent pop-ups are annoyances full of dark patterns designed to frustrate you into affirmatively opting into superfluous data collection and letting companies profit off your information. Saving just a few seconds on pages you browse adds up, and this is especially true if you use something like Cookie AutoDelete that makes your answers to these pop-ups transient.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I just enable every filter except for regional

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 8 hours ago

Well if you aren't visiting . Kz, or . kz adjacent websites - you probably don't need to worry about them.

[–] HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

from what I know, they're only meant to be used as a last resort if a website in a certain language still loads ads. those filters do a blanket ban on a lot of addresses, so they break many sites if you get girlbossy and enable them all

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Consent o Matic doesn't just hide them but actually declines the banners actively. Maybe it has an impact on some statistics that will probably never matter.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

That's a good point, although I have no idea if that actually matters since you IIRC have to affirmatively consent under the GDPR. I try not to add more browser extensions than I strictly need to (and try to only use very popular ones) to try to have some small defense against fingerprinting (even though that's rough to avoid these days).

Browser extensions like Consent-O-Matic also grant yet another piece of software access to nearly every aspect of my digital life – facilitated mainly through the browser – although it being under the MIT License, recommended by Mozilla, and developed by researchers at Aarhaus' CAVI offset that risk a lot.

As long as uBO blocks them, that's good enough for me.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Aaaah, I refuse to think about fingerprinting. It makes everything hurt and I want to like the Internet

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If only my friends believed me that dark patterns were real.

I'm the paranoid crazy one because I say to get the hell off fb and x.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 4 points 23 hours ago

Your friends might be stupid if they are not realizing that those banners are designed to trick people

[–] tyler@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How in the world can you have that view when companies literally advertise about doing those dark patterns?

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They think all corporations good. Anything else scary and bad. Only use apple and Netflix. These are the "normies".

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I don't see how someone could have hat view. You see so much ui chicanery, especially with popups.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's also the Consent-O-Matic browser extension to automatically decline cookies

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disabled it, I don't remember what was the issue, I'll have a try again, thanks for the reminder

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I find it works 90% of the time. Which makes the 10% it doesn’t work annoying because I’m not used to declining cookies anymore 😅

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 49 minutes ago

It works for me all the times, the problem is that some sites break totally until it finishes to refuse the cookies (can't be used, black screen etc etc)

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've enabled it yet I still see cookie notices on a bunch of websites. StackOverflow for example.

[–] clif@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

StackOverflow was my inclination for searching this last week because it pops up the massive cookie banner on EVERY single page load for me. I enabled both the "Cookie Notices" and "Annoyances" lists at the same time - one of them handled it and I think it was Annoyances if I'm remembering correctly.

Try enabling that one too if you haven't already.

EDIT: Just realized I need to enable the social widgets list too : D

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's not enabled by default. I too just learned about this recently.

Edit:

On the topic of uBlock Origin, you can also use it to filter out content on the web version of Lemmy since it doesn't have a native keyword filtering feature. Just add to "my filters" and swap in your own instance.

For comments:
feddit.uk##article.comment-node:has(div.comment-content:has(p:has-text(/elon/i)))

For posts:
feddit.uk##div.post-listing:has(span:has-text(/elon/i))

For urls:
feddit.uk##div.post-listing:has(a[href*="elon.com"])

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Zero Elon Musk news is what I dream of. Fuck that cunt. Thanks for sharing this!

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ublock, filter out the term "linux" and "trump" on lemmy.

......huh, look at that. Lemmy has 6 posts total. Thats 2 more than yesterday! The fediverse is growing!

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago

I have quite the extensive list I've been building over the past few years and so far my record is only 3 posts visible on the frontpage. Most of the time it's nowhere that bad though, but I do notice that it's putting in a lot of work.

[–] Fiorenzo@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thanks for the info. Like many, I use "I don't care about cookies", still sometimes I had to disable on some sites otherwise those became impossible to login or simply access. Is this ublock setting similar?

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 45 minutes ago

I suggest you to use Consent-o-matic instead of I don't care about cookies; It's open source (MIT license) too while I don't care about cookies is closed source and owner by Avast

[–] SteveTech@aussie.zone 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

FYI, "I don't care about cookies" is owned by Avast, and I can't even find the official source code anymore.

[–] Fiorenzo@feddit.it 1 points 2 hours ago

Ok now you've convinced me. Meanwhile I've noticed no troubles adopting the UBO cookies filter on Firefox mobile, time to do the same on my laptop. Thanks

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Couldn't say. I only just recently started using it and haven't run into problems so far.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

In the annoyances you can block the log in with Google/Facebook too

[–] MakingWork@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Can anyone recommend a good self destruction cookie add on for Firefox?

Or a browser better than Firefox and Chrome, both for Linux and for Android?

Much appreciated!

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

my solution is to use container tabs with temporary containers. every new tab or a different website gets a fresh session with no cookies.

[–] kwarg@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LibreWolf is a fork from Firefox. It is a much better alternative for privacy, and deletes cookies by default. You can also configure which pages you want to maintain cookies, e.g. for automatic login (if that's something you want)

[–] MakingWork@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

I like that option!

[–] CptHacke@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

If I recall, there's actually a setting in Firefox that automatically deletes all cookies when you close the browser.

[–] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, this one. It’s one of my three essential extensions: uBlock Origin, NoScript, and Cookie AutoDelete.

[–] MakingWork@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago