501
The third No Kings protests are expected to draw millions. Do they need clearer goals?
(www.theguardian.com)
Probably the best thing about these events, for me, is that I've learned that there are hundreds of like-minded people in my rural area and that I'm not alone in this. Living in this area, it feels like I'm surrounded by nothing by MAGA conservatives and there's no room for dissenting opinions. But it's simply not true. They're just the ones who've been loudest all these years, but that's changing.
Sitting in front of a screen and complaining about what's going on while also disparaging those trying to do something about it -- 100% ineffective, 100% counter productive.
When hundreds of people are showing up in public across thousands of small towns around the country, that's people learning they aren't alone. That's people making new friends. That's people actually getting involved and organizing. And that's not to mention, this is happening in all the major cities as well.
In a way, the demands of the movement are on ourselves, the people attending these events. It comes down to making ourselves responsible for learning how to organize, engaging in political speech, and to normalize exercising our constitutional rights. This is all new to large numbers of people attending these events, so it's a learning experience for a lot of us.
And besides, I think of it this way...
Let's say November rolls around and the president decides to interfere with the elections or he tries to invalidate the elections. What's got a better chance of successfully resisting? A scared and disorganized population that's never organized and/or attended a protest and isn't prepared for what that entails? Or a populace that's done this a few times already in recent history, that's built up support, knows how to organize, knows who to contact, and one who is actively engaged? In this life, there are no guarantees, but if I had to put my money on one of those two, I'm choosing the the latter.