this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
94 points (92.0% liked)

News

33724 readers
3273 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...

Compared to other countries, America is known for bigger cars, portions and take-out coffee cup sizes. For most of recent history, Americans have also wanted bigger homes — but now that’s changing.

For most of the last half-century, new single-family homes kept growing. In 1973, the median size of completed single-family homes was 1,525 square feet, according to US Census data. By 2015, that number had ballooned to 2,467 square feet.

But as the cost of buying a home has exploded and McMansions have fallen out of favor, homebuilders have reversed course, building smaller homes with an eye to first-time buyers. In 2023, the median single-family home built was 2,233 square feet, down 9% from the 2015 peak, with many formal dining rooms and “bonus” rooms disappearing.

Carias and her partner ultimately settled on a roughly 920-square-foot home. To maximize space, they decided to use the basement as their primary bedroom.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This just means you'll pay the same price for a smaller house.

Source: am australian

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yes, but they need to spread propaganda that the top 10% are not bleeding the rest if us dry.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It takes less resources and money to keep a smaller house. Smaller repair bills, smaller utility bills and smaller amounts of maintenance. Smaller, more sustainable housing should require people to work less to afford to live.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago

Or it means, people get in way more debt than they can afford to buy a small low quality house, that costs more than a comparable apartment and doesn't offer any of the benefits of a proper house.

We have those developments here in Germany and it's awful. It looks like shit and I'm 80% sure that a significant part of the current owners could only afford their houses due to the low interest rates of the last decade. If they have to inevitably refinance, someone loses their job or a large unexpected expense happens, they're absolutely fucked.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago

Welcome to German suburbs. Where the space between houses is the absolute minimum, the houses are only slightly larger than a reasonable apartment and every house looks exactly the same like in the 20 other new development areas around the city.

It's the plastic version of the discount dream of wealth.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hey CNN, you dropped the most important value there buddy. I see median new construction is still 200k+ more than I can afford so....

WHAT'S THE PRICE!?

I don't for one single millisecond believe that these "starter houses" will come with starter prices. You know, the whole goddamn reason we can't buy anything...

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They didn't drop it. You didn't read the article.

There are signs those efforts might be helping buyers get in the door: The median sales price of existing homes jumped to $426,900 in June, according to the National Association of Realtors, while the median price of new homes in June was $417,300, according to the US Census Bureau.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Okay I thought my guess was already ridiculous but what in the actual fuck?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I did read and it's in my comment (in the form of "it's 200k+ more than I can afford" referring to their median quote). They specifically say the median price of new homes, they didn't specify these "starter homes" that the article is supposed to be about.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Young people are getting fucked by previous generations, and will have to make do with less. It's pretty great for rich people, though!"

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

But have you tried being born wealthy?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They’re only 386k(!)

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

For most of recent history, Americans have also wanted bigger homes — but now that’s changing.

For most of recent history, there were no other options. We codified a lot of this into regulations.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Shrinkflation has reached the real estate market.

[–] jprice@kbin.run 14 points 1 year ago

Pay MORE for LESS! It’s the American idiot way!

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Oh yes, now I can definitely live in a 10 sqms apartment, yey

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

On a related subject, this video goes pretty deep into real estate development and why American garages are shrinking.

https://youtu.be/b8wnnFUazOY?si=Hyr70ei-ggllXdn3

[–] Vibi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kind of okay with this. I don't really want to manage/clean a huge place. 2 bed, 1 bath, 1 car garage , and a little back yard is perfect for me as a single person. If it was priced reasonably, I would jump at it- but where I live they'd charge close to a mil and everything would start to fall apart in a year or two because of cut corners 😞

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

I have that, minus the yard, in my apartment. I pay $1,400/month in Austin, TX.

[–] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We just had our first and live in a two bed that’s “1500” sq feet I could not imaging a family of 4 or 5 living in smaller especially if 1 or both spouses work from home. I need a room to close the door at the end of the day to not look at work anymore

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/08/05/business/home-sizes-shrinking/index.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, a smaller home makes adding an ADU to rent out easier on a standard lot. At least in high COL areas.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the lots are getting subdivided.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, that works too.

Someone bought a home over my way and added a 2-story ADU in their backyard. They rent both units out. Probably pays for the mortgage completely.

I laugh when I pass that one. No idea how they got a 2-story permit for an ADU that is taller than it is wide in a 1-story neighborhood.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

depends on local restrictions. in california i'm limited to 25 feet or as tall as the main house, whichever is lower.