this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
17 points (81.5% liked)

Quark's

2077 readers
47 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This exceptional case, where the family and estate of the late Val Kilmer are supportive of a generative AI constructed performance, seems likely to become a precedent.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

This is just gross.

[–] agentTeiko@piefed.social 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corpse puppeteering is a non starter for me.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

I was appalled when they did Cushing in that Star Wars film. It's called makeup and casting, find a warm body and make them look alike, you don't need this digital necromancy

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I'm not interested in the movie, but it sounds like everyone involved is okay with it, and Val wanted to be in the movie.

That said, I hope the movie flops.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly a little shocked that his estate isn’t suing the absolute shit out of these psychos

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you read the article at all? His estate and kids are all supportive of it, they want it made because of the important message of the movie (it’s based around some real life story). It sucks that they’re using AI but it’s what everyone seemed to want in this case. The man died from cancer, that’s the only reason he isn’t in the movie. He had already been cast but physically couldn’t handle being on set.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

His estate wanted to make money fucking over another actor and creating a black hole of originality.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Val Kilmer wanted this as well. He had already had his voice recreated in AI for a previous movie so that he could continue to communicate with the audience in a way that felt more authentic to him (his "real" voice, not his voice while he was battling throat cancer).

“His family kept saying how important they thought the movie was and that Val really wanted to be a part of this,” says Coerte Voorhees. “He really thought it was important story that he wanted his name on.

“As human beings, the ability to communicate is the core of our existence and the side effects from throat cancer have made it difficult for others to understand me,” he added. “The chance to narrate my story, in a voice that feels authentic and familiar, is an incredibly special gift.”

Also, the director said that recasting would have been his preference but wouldn't be feasible for them as they don't have the budget to refilm the scenes with all the other actors.

Ya'll are bordering on disrespecting the wishes of a dead man.