this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
349 points (98.9% liked)

World News

54650 readers
2799 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel did not have a realistic plan for regime change when it attacked Iran, multiple Israeli security sources have said, with expectations that airstrikes could lead to a popular uprising having been driven by “wishful thinking” rather than hard intelligence.

Iran has survived nearly two weeks of bombing raids and the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Trump is publicly contemplating ending the increasingly costly war.

If Iran’s new leadership keeps its grip on power, the long-term measure of the success of the conflict may hang on the fate of 440kg of enriched uranium which was buried under a mountain by US strikes last June, former and serving Israeli defence and intelligence sources said. Enough for more than 10 nuclear warheads, Iran could use it to hasten the construction of a weapon if the material remains in the country.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

No need for regime change if you just kill all the public there. Seems to be Israrl's plan for Gaza.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 hours ago

AFAIK we currently have no idea, if the tunnel system of the enrichment facility has been destroyed or not. Meaning, if they even have access to 50kg of enriched uranium, it will be quite easy for them to assemble that on a rocket that reaches Tel Aviv. And if the Chinese deliver some nice intercontinental rockets, DC will be gone, too.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The regime change is happening on US soil. The ultimate conservative wet dream: The American government is being privatized.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ah but you have changed the regime. You've switched out one that was sorta kinda meh passively loathing you for one that is now for sure actively hating you and seeking your destruction!

Suffering from success?

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 hours ago

Bored of Peace

Or... Maybe failure was the goal. If you would claim to preemptively attack a country to prevent future attacks, which then leads to future attacks, why wouldn't you also preemptively use threats of terrorism to go ahead and crack down on civil liberty?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

And throwing phosphorus is changing the regime?

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

An air campaign alone, removing the current leadership with airstrikes and blocking Iranian sea-trade will not win the war. The Russians and Chinese are fucking delighted, because they can evaluate and examine the US weapon systems capabilities. Regime change, it ain't gonna happen until Israel and US military forces can physically occupy Iran.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

Because the plan was to distract from the files.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 29 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah.

We noticed.

They're literally just improvising this war, because the point is to create chaos in Iran and they don't care how bad it gets. These bastards want another Sudan.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Correct me if I am wrong, however isn't destabilizing the neighborhood that you live in is generally a bad idea?

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If the choice is between a central organized state that can make missiles to launch at you, or a basket case country with no ability to make missiles because the industry is destroyed and the ones that are left are being fired within the country, you pick the basket case state.

Israel knows at this point they aren't going to get a stable friendly regime in Iran like they have in the Gulf states since popular sentiment is so against them the people would overthrow that government. So if they can't get a friendly state it's better there's no state at all to channel the broad hatred for Israel.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Trick question, the answer is c) you establish mutually beneficial ties with your neighbors and stop being jingoist fuckstains so neither of you have to launch missiles at each other.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Maybe it seems less so when you have a country sending you free WMD's every week.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 57 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

Funny enough this is what may fuck Trump over big time. Americans have been spoiled by their super low gas prices so the sudden increase is a shock nd he can't blame it on Biden or his other usual go tos.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

nd he can't blame it on Biden or his other usual go tos.

Lol watch him

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

He can't form new memories. I swear he thinks he is in the 80s again during the hostage crisis and is still obsessed with Obama/Biden.

Still, his base seems to love a geriatric child rapist so I'm not sure they will be able to connect gas prices to his actions, even if he is essentially hitting them in the face with it.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 10 points 11 hours ago

My coworkers have already managed to blame Obama for making a "shitty deal" with Iran, and Biden for not "dealing with Iran sooner"

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

Never underestimate the Democrats ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 22 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Never underestimate the high powered, highly financed propaganda machine the right has constructed - that and the gullibility and stupidity of Americans.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

*The gullible stupidity of the GOP voters.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

I mean, there's plenty of non voters who guzzle up bullshit too.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 2 points 10 hours ago

Just republican voters actually

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I agree.

Americans' #1 issue is affordability, and it is the only reason they voted for Donald. He thought he had a mandate to rebrand and rebuild the Gestapo. He thought he had a mandate to dismantle the government.

No, Americans were tired of being priced out of their lives for the last four years, hated Democrats for doing nothing about it, and believed his lies about making America an affordable place to live again.

Ironically, not even the SAVE Act will be able to save him. Tens of millions of Americans are already working multiple jobs and 100 hours a week just to overpay for their rent on a roach-infested studio. The mid-terms are going to be an absolute bloodbath for Republicans. (Though most of the Democrats we elect won't do anything to make America affordable either.)

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

What could Democrats do to make America affordable? They can't clear a veto proof majority in the Senate, even with a blue wave exceeding all expectations. So that just means nobody can pass anything anymore.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

As a former political strategist: You flood the zone with good bills. Give them so many that the propaganda machine cannot knock them all down. You can go as far left as you want with it, so long as it works and works quickly (w/in 12-18 mos.)

Dare Trump to veto free childcare or money for struggling families. Dare the Republicans to vote against the SAVE MAIN STREET act. Make them vote against the SAVE RURAL AMERICA ACT.

We'll get some wins for people, and we'll make these bastards own their dumbfuck regressive nonsense policies.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Thanks for a good answer!

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The same shit Donald is doing. In reverse.

Amazing you've seen Donald accomplish so much with almost no congressional participation and you'll still argue Dems are powerless, and probably will again when President Newsom lets affordability get even worse.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Ah, I thought you were talking about midterms.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 8 points 15 hours ago

You are correct, but that won't stop them from trying to blame them.

Also the Dems are so ineffectual lately, they might just make it easy for him.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

In a lot of ways you can blame Americans intolerance for rises in gas prices for the situation we’re in. Hard to imagine Trump being possible without Reagan, and while there’s lots of factors to his victory in 80 to hear my older family members in Georgia tell it that was what made them flip on the native son who for most was the only democrat they ever voted for

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

No shit homie?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Because they don't want to "win"...

Bibi and trump both, they don't want a victory, they want a forever war they can use as justification to cancel elections.

Look at the people responsible for stopping terror attacks, they're trying to make one happen thru sheer incompetence if nothing else. trump is desperate for some type of "attack on America" because he expects a 9/11 style bump in approval, when it's likely to be the opposite reaction if it happens.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

While I understand the hypothesis, I am not sure it is working out that way.

Although Trump is trying desperately to find a way to subvert the elections, given the decentralized State based nature of it, it's going to take more than an external war with Iran to justify an internal canceling of the elections. The SAVE Act is an attempt at nationalizing the Elections, but while it's moving it lacks the capacity to jump the biggest hurdle in the Senate. Any Executive attempt at nationalizing the elections has very little judicial basis, which would make it hard to hold up in court. It's dynamic and complex, but it's not as simple as his declaration of marshal law.

That is not to say your sentiment isn't correct. If he can find a way, or his backers can find a way, they will try and do it.

On the second point, Trump didn't get a 9/11 style bump. Indeed it seems to have gone almost the opposite way based on polling. Given inflation and other economic impacts, it might cause more defections before it helps him.

What it has done is push Epstein out of the US new. This too might have been part of the calculus. It is still rippling through the UK and other political systems, but the US has put it aside for now.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

given the decentralized State based nature of it, it’s going to take more than an external war with Iran to justify an internal canceling of the elections.

If trump was constrained by a system of checks and balances, sure.

But I think there's a strong chance he "declares" them cancelled, Dem states hold them and Red states don't...

And then we see what happens on 1/6.

Like, we can't just expect them to play by the rules when there entire ethos is "fuck you, make me".

Someone's gonna have to make them... Whether thats words or actions is what we need to find out.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Bibi just wants Iran broken and bleeding. That means nobody else can stop his settling program, aka conquer and colonize the Middle East.

Trump is just there because he thought it would be easy.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

They also want the US nose bloodied as much as possible so they throw up our hands, tell them the middle east is their problem now and give them boat loads of cash to "fix the problem".

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 1 points 10 hours ago

Trump is just there because he thought it would be easy.

He doesn't do anything without there being something in it for him personally. We don't know what he's getting out of it yet, it could be blackmail threats, Saudi money, or something else.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

American Christian extremists do...

But their prophecy is for a Jewish ethnostate to start a war that becomes Armageddon...

And to lose that war at which point the rapture happens and everyone globally gets raptured before Armageddon spreads world wide and into "Christian nations".

Bibi and Jewish extremists want to conquer the world.

The alliance won't hold together. At some point the Christian extremists will abandon Israel to bring about the next step; the destruction of Israel. Because their prophecy requires the destruction of Israel.

None of them are working towards the same goal, they're just temporarily working towards the same step, and when they reach it their plans diverege.

With the current war in Iran, the Christian extremists might move to the next step any day. We could see a sudden and drastic reversal in how Republicans treat Israel any day now.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

They attacked Iran with a clear view to raise oil revenues

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

They’re just winging it

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Of course. Yahoo is a fucking dictator.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

And Trump and the Republicans are the useful idiots.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Death spasms of a dying empire

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

An expensive gamble, you lost. Now it's time to pay your dues. Don't do what you fucks always do and manufacture consent.

[–] arrrse@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

Lord almighty! It must be a democrat hoax. There is NO WAY donald. Jay trump would do anything without a food proof plan. Mark my words, it was crooked-dick joe