this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
599 points (98.4% liked)

Climate

8420 readers
999 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
599
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 23 minutes ago

It is blatantly not motivated by the economy (except the few vested interests).

It is mostly about power.

[–] klay1@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know, man. What if its cloudy?

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

You can use batterys

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Me shouting the answer, but you can't hear it over the bombs exploding across the Straight of Hormuz

[–] MrsVeggies@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There are other expenses and location also plays a big role, but it is certainly true that solar is much cheaper when all is said and done. Hence why the energy transition continues in the US even without subsidies.

[–] copd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

my solar panels don't produce shit because my city never sees the sun.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm solar fan #1, but 5x that price would still be a good deal on panels

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

only problem with me personally about this, is that i'm stuck with gasoline using car, i dont have money to buy 50k electric car :/

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

We got ours for 30k with 200 miles on it, retails 45k.

Dealerships hate buying these cars used because they think there isn't a market for used ev's, in part because they're so expensive, anyone who wants an ev can afford to buy one new, they think the second hand market isn't there, go in and offer to buy a used one and see what your dealer says, I bet you can get one for half that.

Also there's some electric only second hand dealerships starting to pop up. Maybe one in your area?

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

I don't know anything about the situation in the US, but you get a great second hand EV for around 12.000€ here in Germany. Combustion is cheaper to buy but gets more expensive over time. It has over 250 moving parts, EVs have like 7.

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago

Ikr? I could have had $10k BYD Dolphin, but we haaaad to do the tariff wars.

I will offhandedly mention that ebikes are getting pretty good/cheap nowadays, but that's obviously not going to work for everyone.

[–] lostme@piefed.social 43 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

I missed it when it made the rounds a few weeks back. Thanks for sharing again!

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

When is it ever a bad time?

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.zip 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Fakebelieve@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago

good time to plug the technology connections video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

A) only one of those technologies is burning the planet... kinda big part of the equation

B) here are the numbers for australia:

source: https://www.csiro.au/en/research/technology-space/energy/Electricity-transition/GenCost

C) see A

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Agreed. A more telling graph would incorporate socialized losses, including subsidies, life-and-limb for related industries, quality of life, and life expectancy. I sincerely doubt these costs for the construction, manufacture, and installation of solar panels comes anywhere close to that of petroleum products.

load more comments
view more: next ›