this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
579 points (99.5% liked)

News

36439 readers
2325 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lindsey Graham, the veteran Republican senator who has been pushing for war against Iran for decades, has issued a dire warning to the Iranian government, saying it was worth spending money to “take this regime down”.

“When this regime goes down, we are going to have a new Middle East, and we are going [to] make a tonne of money,” Graham, a longtime proponent of US military intervention abroad, told Fox News on Sunday.

Graham, who has been one of the Trump administration’s most vocal supporters of Israel and the war against Iran, appeared to suggest that the US abduction of Venezuela’s left-wing leader Nicolas Maduro and the attack on Iran were launched to gain control over each country’s oil supplies.

“Venezuela and Iran have 31 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We’re going to have a partnership with 31 percent of the known reserves. This is China’s nightmare. This is a good investment,” said Graham.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 hours ago

War-mongering, conquering, and looting the spoils. Some things never change.

They are, did any of you get rich from the war on terror, or any other war for that matter?

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] songwriterallnighter@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

I think that might be an insult…to the prostitutes.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 18 points 5 hours ago

Who is this "we" that keep talking about? I haven't seen Jack shit.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 25 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

“Venezuela and Iran have 31 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We’re going to have a partnership with 31 percent of the known reserves."

Kinda saying the quiet part loud there, aren't you, Lindsey? In prior decades the government at least pretended its wars were about anything other than oil...

"This is China’s nightmare."

No it's not. China has been ambracing the future by investing in renewables. It's not stuck in the past, and it doesn't give a shit if you are. The oil economy is dead and dying. It will be replaced, and at this rate the US won't be ready for it. China is laughing.

"This is a good investment”

War isn't a fucking investment! Are dollar signs all you see?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

China has never produced a lot of energy relying on oil in the first place. They did improve a lot adding renewables to the pie, but sadly, they still heavily rely on coal.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

China has a 100 year plan, the orange dotard himself doesn't know what he is going to be doing in the next 100 minutes...

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

No it’s not. China has been ambracing the future by investing in renewables. It’s not stuck in the past, and it doesn’t give a shit if you are. The oil economy is dead and dying. It will be replaced, and at this rate the US won’t be ready for it. China is laughing.

image

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

The humans on this planet really are going to incinerate themselves over little green pieces of paper.

This whole timeline feels like Vogon poetry

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Lindsey graham is a child rapist and murderer who is owned by AIPAC

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago

and yet he keeps getting elected, best rep they can come up with, love him ?

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There's no way he said tonne with the e at the end like that.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Shoddy reporting by Al Jazeera. Graham was clearly speaking American, not English.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

ᴏᴜʀ ʜᴀᴛʀᴇᴅ ɪꜱ ᴄᴏɴᴄʀᴇᴛᴇ. ᴏᴜʀ ᴇɴᴇᴍʏ ɪꜱ ᴏʙᴠɪᴏᴜꜱ.
ɪᴛ'ꜱ ɪʙʟɪꜱ.
ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʜʀɪꜱᴛɪᴀɴ.
ᴀɴᴅ ᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴋᴏʀᴀɴ ꜱᴀʏꜱ:
ɪ ᴡɪʟʟ ꜰɪʟʟ ʜᴇʟʟ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʏᴏᴜ ᴀʟʟ,
ʏᴏᴜ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜᴏꜱᴇ ᴀꜰᴛᴇʀ ʏᴏᴜ...

-- from the New Pope

Depends on the definition of we. Military actions almost never end well financially.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 33 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Ah it's the 2000s again. They'll top it off with a global financial crisis. Probably the AI bubble collapsing or succeeding and destroying all the jobs.

Maybe the Americans will elect an Obama 2.0 after. Maybe not. There wasn't MAGA last time. More likley it'll be president mecha-Hitler or something this time around.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

I’m still not down from my hate-high after the last election. America doesn’t need someone else to step in and responsibly commandeer the government. Not yet.

The pain must go on long enough for the lesson to stick.

Conserv卐tives don’t learn until they’re personally affected. Not all of them are as yet affected.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 5 points 16 hours ago

If we're going by extremes maybe we can get a socialist president this time round? Actual universal healthcare?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 30 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Textbook psychopath. A truly immoral, sadistic, bloodthirsty bastard of the sort Hunter Thompson would conjure to represent the foulest archetype of American politics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago

For those not old enough to remember, they said the Iraqi war would pay for itself with all of that oil.

It did not.

But, Graham isn't talking "we" the US people, but "we" as in the club we're not in, AKA bOtH pArTiEs Super Friends.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 205 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Fuck you "we." "We" who!? When oil companies profit "we" don't see a fucking dime of that money especially with your corporate "taxation" bullshit where they get loophole after loophole to pay nothing.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 75 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, he means himself and his friends, which is what all politicians have always meant when they say "we" are going to benefit from their decisions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 13 points 23 hours ago

Yeah but on the upside you do get to pay for the bombs they're dropping on Iranian kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago

Let me guess, polymarket

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No blood for oil. It was evil and stupid in the 00s, and it's worse today now that oil is increasingly replaceable

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 22 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The hilarious thing is that the American voter is supposed to be thinking of themselves when he says "we". I would kinda understand the logic of continuing the forever war as a voter if everyone got a fat check once we ended the Iraq war. At least then I could understand that it is pure greed driving people to vote for war mongers.

In the end "we" is a small group of oil barons who made billions while footing the multi trillion bill to the tax payer. Unfortunately this just means that the average voter is greedy, but to stupid to actually benefit from their own avarice.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Still hoping for that trickle down 40 years later.

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Golden Shower economics, surely the rich will start pissing on our heads any day now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago

Conservatives are so clownishly selfish.

They're the hamster that gets mad at the other hamster and shits in the shared food bowl out of spite.

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Profits over people once again.

Republicans are genuinely traitors to the US. It’s hard to put into words how much I hate them.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 10 points 20 hours ago

Traitors to humanity

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago

Same old Republican party. Waste of oxygen IMHO.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Someone already made tonne of money on forex. Looking at the chart the war is over and it was just a forex scam.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Make sure the shitbag's grandchildren are fucking drafted! The MAGA fucks always said the USA has enough oil reserves to be self-sufficient. As usual, BS!

[–] Ibisalt@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

meanwhile gas prices just doubled, thanks for that america. get rid of your fascist regime, please? :(

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Remember when we joked about america invading anything for oil and then we all stopped for a bit because they tried to convince us that there was more to the US than being the state equivelent of a crackhead with a dozen shotguns? And then they launched a self described war to bring about the apocalypse and also steal all the oil... can we stop pretending everything is ok!?

load more comments (4 replies)

Fantastic! That means no need to pay taxes for the next 3 years

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

Anyone else watch Rick and Morty, isn't Graham basically Jerry in couple therapy place (mean outside of the 'presenting' that it does)? It's just so subservient to whoever he latches on to. Mean from bomb Iran of McCain it just may be doing his previous hang on wishes here too. But seriously this guy is a senator that has a leadership ability of a wet noodle. Aren't senators supposed to be strong in their own convictions? Mean maybe there's lots I haven't heard of Mr Graham but I don't think McCain would be happy with his swap.

Least McCain had some principles and would now down to the orange turd, that's the only good thing I saw from him (okay plus telling someone in an audience to be respectful of Obama, you'd never see that today)

[–] breakfastmtn@piefed.ca 21 points 1 day ago (7 children)

We're expected to believe Graham was speaking in metric?? Fake news!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›