this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
270 points (91.7% liked)

Technology

82250 readers
4220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDW:

Brazil is requiring OS level age verification by march 17th, 2026.

New York about to vote on a law that would "require all manufacturers of internet-enabled devices, operating systems, or application stores to conduct commercially reason-able and technically feasible age assurance for users at the point of device activation."

In order to “incentivize” age verification, The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced that they will ignore COPPA violations for software performing age verification.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imhotep@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

Lemmy users upvoting Brian Lunduke is surprising. He’s very right wing from what I remember

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 16 points 2 hours ago

When they make it law to have age verification in your operating system, only outlaws will have operating systems without age verification.

I guess I'm an outlaw then. Enjoy your visit to the wild west, we will always have illegal operating systems aplenty.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Wow they really are just pushing it now lol.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 6 points 2 hours ago

Interesting discussion on this from yesterday on the NixOS forums:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/compliance-with-u-s-age-verification-laws/75791

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 45 points 4 hours ago

can we stop linking to lunduke (he’s a transphobe chud)

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 14 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Christians. Republicans. ICE. MAGA.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 40 minutes ago

What about the UK, Australia and the European Union, then?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

Groups that want to remove anonymity from the internet.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 54 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

13 days 😂 Tell me you don't know how software development works or how operating systems are developed without telling me.

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 26 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Unless someone already has age verification ready to go and wanted to be a monopoly for a while.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

CTO at Microslop: QUICK, VIBE CODE THAT AGE VERIFICATION, WE GOTTA BE FIRST ON THIS

[turns the data center cooling pipes from the nearest freshwater lake up to 11]

[–] shark@lemmy.org 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This is my theory about California and age verification. As soon as alternative mobile operating system are getting better there’s suddenly a law about operating systems requiring age verification? Maybe I’m just paranoid.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

HMMMMM kinda sus tho ngl (I'm serious)

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

And Persona (it's from the same guy).

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 22 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

How on earth are they going to enforce this in smaller IOT chips? I just got an esp32-c3 for like $1.50. I highly doubt that things is able to run whatever bloatware they are going to require.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 hours ago

Hardware that can be manufactured on larger nodes can't really be stopped, and the (black) market for both old and new free hardware will be big, considering all the things that will inevitably be banned. As always, don't comply in advance

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 265 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

In order to “incentivize” age verification, The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced that they will ignore COPPA violations for software performing age verification.

COPPA prevents companies from collecting data on minors without parental consent.

Sounds like the Epstein Class is still in charge of the FTC.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, this does not sound like it's going to make our children any safer.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 79 points 8 hours ago

Feels weird upvoting this comment. I have to remind myself. It's not you I'm mad at. You're not the one doing this. You're just the messanger.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 37 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The irony knows no bounds, the one half decent reason age verification could exists for is so these companies have no more excuses to ignore coppa because now they can just pretend everyone is a consenting adult.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 hours ago

The fact that there will be a signal implying a user is an adult will give all sorts of bad actors plausible deniability, perhaps even legal protection, for exploiting children, who will of course be bypassing it

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 48 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

So this is the thing I'll eventually end up in jail for bypassing. I coul've sworn it would be drugs.

Oh well.

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah, the fact that I can wave to a cop walking out of a store where I just bought some pot, but might face massive fines for not doing age verification for a pong game I wrote is insane. I mean, I still want to be able to smoke my pot legally, but I also don't want to have to care about who plays pong.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 110 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

They are taking the power of personal computing away from us...

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 40 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like there is a line coming with hardware and software and that will be the last of it's type as the move towards subscription based services is forced onto everyone. Its a shame people won't vote with their wallets. It just means I'll have my basement crammed with old tech and I'll go full old man mode and stop keeping up with technological progress.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

Too bad you will need hard drives for that. And all the rest.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

Thats my plan.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 70 points 8 hours ago

Pretty much. They‘re essentially outlawing privacy so there will be no point in resisting. This is worse than Orwellian.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I guess a broken clock is right twice a day. Bitter Lunduke don't fool yourself this guy is a tool

Unless it's digital.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 90 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

It's gonna be fun when people are sitting around a campfire talking about how bad tech ceos, wall street backed corporations, enshittification, corrupt politicians and fascism all led to the extinction of the tech golden age... as they prepare their spears to fight the next wave of machines coming to harvest them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 42 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Accountless linux distros incoming

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 56 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Can’t wait for distros to post a disclaimer that this software is strictly intended only for use on the moon.

[–] morto@piefed.social 29 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Better yet. Say that the software isn't intended for any use at all and they don't allow you to download it, but then leave an open directory with the images

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 17 points 7 hours ago

"By downloading this software, you agree you are a very naughty boy or girl."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TriplePlaid@wetshav.ing 47 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Pretty soon you'll be hearing folks say things like "why are you worried if you don't have anything to hide" as if personal privacy has no value whatsoever. It's a slippery slope!!!

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

You close the door when you poop and you don't broadcast your WhatsApp messages on time square.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

@TriplePlaid@wetshav.ing @qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de @technology@lemmy.world

For me, a Brazilian, there's something I must hide if I want to be employable: my occultist practices, my religion. I'm a worshiper of Lilith, surrounded by mostly Christian people. I literally heard "faux-jokes" (when people want to condemn someone, but wrapping the condemnation as a joke) tying my belief to "ending up in hell".

Even though my legal name isn't difficult to find through my pseudonym, you can imagine why I use a pseudonym to openly express my religion. And once digital activity is tied to my CPF (Brazilian citizen/legal identity), and I'm definitely not buying the "anonymized checking" arguments, suddenly potential employers and buyers/merchants will know I "worship the devil" and will have yet another reason to refuse hiring me or buying/selling things from/to me.

Also, some of Lilith imagery and stories involve content which is sensitive, subjected to those very "age check" laws, further making it necessary for me to comply to "age checks" whenever I want to read or write, observe or do drawings about the fundamental deity I worship.

But according to certain people, "having something to hide = must be a criminal!!!". Because they're likely followers of some mainstream religion which is not socially persecuted, or religion isn't something significant in their lives.

Seriously. I'm truly tired of this world.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 50 minutes ago

Thank you for telling you story. I'm sorry that you are in the position you are in where you can't freely be yourself around others.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

I have nothing to hide. I also have nothing to show you.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's not a slippery slope, it's a drop into a pit fall.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago

please don't get this guy any attention. he is a far right conspiracy theorist.

load more comments
view more: next ›