this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026

116 points (99.2% liked)

Dull Men's Club

3680 readers

370 users here now

An unofficial chapter of the popular Dull Men's Club.

1. Relevant commentary on your own dull life. Posts should be about your own dull, lived experience. This is our most important rule. Direct questions, random thoughts, comment baiting, advice seeking, many uses of "discuss" rarely comply with this rule.

2. Original, Fresh, Meaningful Content.

3. Avoid repetitive topics.

4. This is not a search engine
Use a search engine, a tradesperson, Reddit, friends, a specialist Facebook group, apps, Wikipedia, an AI chat, a reverse image search etc. to answer simple questions or identify objects. Also see rule 1, “comment baiting”.

There are a number of content specific communities with subject matter experts who can help you.

Some other communities to consider before posting:

5. Keep it dull. If it puts us to sleep, it’s on the right track. Examples of likely not dull: jokes, gross stuff (including toes), politics, religion, royalty, illness or injury, killing things for fun, or promotional content. Feel free to post these elsewhere.

6. No hate speech, sexism, or bullying No sexism, hate speech, degrading or excessively foul language, or other harmful language. No othering or dehumanizing of anyone or negativity towards any gender identity.

7. Proofread before posting. Use good grammar and punctuation. Avoid useless phrases. Some examples: - starting a post with "So" - starting a post with pointless phrases, like "I hope this is allowed" or “this is my first post” Only share good quality, cropped images. Do not share screenshots of images; share the original image.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

PriorityMotif@lemmy.world

116

I Changed A Car Battery (piefed.ca)

submitted 17 hours ago by Curious_Canid@piefed.ca to c/dull_mens_club@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We have an old Prius we rarely used that has needed a new battery for...I'm too embarrassed to say. It's more of a project than it sounds like for several reasons.

First, without a working battery, the rear hatch does not open normally. The only way to open it is to crawl through the interior into the back, then find a small opening with a manual release, then figure out how to get it to actually release. And if you don't apply upward force on the door while you do that, it will immediately latch itself closed again. Adding to the fun, the release is below the rear deck, so you have to lift it out of the way, when you would prefer to be sitting on it. It is awkward.

Second, getting to the battery requires you to remove a lot more than anyone would reasonably expect. To take out the small section of floor above it, you first half to remove the main floor and the storage tray underneath it. Then you finally have access to the battery. You have to unscrew the contacts and the bracket the holds it in place down inside a narrow well that's just big enough or the battery. It does not easily fit ratchets or even screwdrivers at the angles where you need them. It is also awkward.

Third, it's a simple thing, but lifting a car battery out of a narrow hole when you have nothing to hold onto is surprisingly difficult. The battery that was in there no longer had any kind of a lifting strap, so I had to lift it out by pressing my fingertips around the sides of it. It was awkward and also somewhat painful.

Fourth, lifting in the new battery was easy, but putting everything back together was every bit as much fun as it was t take it apart. See "Second" above.

It would have all been a lot easier if I weren't 65 and seriously overweight. I'm still fairly strong, but I am not nearly as flexible as I used to be and I don't fit into small spaces well.

I wasn't at all sure the car would start, even with a new battery, but it did start right up. Now I just have to do some basic cleaning and I can take it to CarMax to see what they'll give me for it.

I'm claiming victory, if only a small one.

top 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

My other car is a Subaru Outback. It is the car that was designed by engineers. And it is wonderful.

Every technical aspect has been thought through in every direction until it made the most sense. Everything from the functioning of the drivetrain through the style and positioning of the readouts provide a lot of useful information without being cluttered. The seats are comfortable and the control are egonomic. Things are easy to access, both inside and outside.

It handles like a much smaller car, but it's wide enough to lean into corners without reducing traction on the inside tires. There is plenty of power and the symmetric all-wheel drive puts it wherever it needs to go. The active safety features provide useful guardrails and emergency backup to the driver, and they make long-distance driving easier and more comfortable. It even gets surprisingly good fuel efficiency.

Finally, I was once in a really bad accident with my previous Outback. A driver T-boned me, in the middle of a busy intersection, right on the passenger door, while doing around 50 mph. It rolled the car two full times, and it only stopped because it hit a van while vertical and bounced off the side.

The outside of the car was thoroughly destroyed.bbThe passenger compartment was untouched, except for all the windows breaking. The airbags kept everything firmly in place instead of flailing around. The curtain airbags, in particular, kept my head from bouncing off the pavement through the broken side window as it rolled.

When it finally stopped, my passenger and I were a little dizzy, but otherwise perfectly fine. Our most serious injury was an eighth inch cut on my hand from a piece of glass. We received immediate medical attention, but after thorough exams, they were surprised to admit that we were not injured. We walked away from it. Needless to say, I replaced that car with the exact same model.

Subaru has consistently added new technology as an option, then made it standard after it proved itself. That's how they have acquired all-around disc brakes, symmetric all-wheel drive, anti-lock braking, "Eyesight" collision avoidance, and any number of other small, but useful features. While other car companies win awards for design, Subaru has won a lot of awards for their engines and drivetrains. Engineers.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 6 points 13 hours ago

I have a Chevrolet Volt, same EXACT situation.

Back hatch doesn't unlock without power. So I got to contort my stupid ass over the back seats to get back there. Then you pull up the back bottom floor thingie, but god have mercy on your soul, it's impossible to do because there's no where else to put your body.

So yeah it was this whole Cirque Du Soleil act back there just to swap the battery.

[–] username_1@programming.dev 19 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

If I were a billionaire I would gather engineers to construct a car. But I won't call marketers or designers. Just engineers. Just "make a car that is nice to use and maintain". I might become a trillionaire if I were a billionaire and made such a car.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I hear ya, but... I believe there are a lot of safety features in modern cars that aren't really in the "nice to use and maintain" category. e.g. I think cars are built to "crumple" in a way that keeps the human alive.

[–] username_1@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Engineers know more about safety than designers. A lot more.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No doubt. I guess I'm just saying: add some safety criteria into the mix. Maybe as a subset of usability.

[–] username_1@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago

nice to use

I think safety is a part of "nice to use". And I'm not a billionaire and not going to build a car factory. So this terminology dispute doesn't make much sense anyway.

[–] admin@scrapetacular.ydns.eu 5 points 10 hours ago

If you did this you'd become a millionaire not a trillionaire because nobody would ever buy a new one.

Gotta build some planned obsolescence in there if you want a trilly

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean designers would also be important in that equation, the problem is just that design has been cannibalized by marketing and branding

But like, where an engineer solves physics problems (and software developers solve logic problems), designers solve human problems. So ergonomics, intuitive controls, a design that has useful features for basic tasks and makes sense for daily life, that communicates saftey information in an effective and clear way, and accessibility, are all things a designer would be more suited to than an engineer

Unfortunately companies are increasingly corrupting the role of designers from "being the advocate of the end user" to being another bs marketing person who does whatever will look shiny and sell more units, while ignoring stuff that actually matters.

But design is also deeply important to building a thing that is well considered and doesnt suck

[–] username_1@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

doesnt suck

Engineers are excellent at this. And yes, modern designers are anti-customer. So the end-result ergonomic-wise would be better if done by engineer who by default pro-customer than if done by designer who might be better in theory but in practice just deliberately makes things worse.

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

As a business analyst that worked between the engineers and the end customer, I can attest that in my situation, the engineers had zero idea what the customer wanted. In fact, when I presented the engineers with the customer's requirements (no designer involved), they told me I was wrong, contacted the customer personally, and only then came back and said, "Ok, we'll do it that way."

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Iam also a BA between engineers, leadership, ops, and client success. The engineers have zero clue why they're even doing the things they are doing.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 7 points 14 hours ago

You'd end up with something like early VWs or military style Jeeps.

You know what, count me in.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 16 hours ago

It isn't that easy - cars have a lot of compromises so often you can't get what you want. Though the worst problems shouldn's be.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 6 points 16 hours ago

Always found the idea of putting the car battery is in a place that needs 12V to reach to be just so confusing lmao. Good Job gettin' it done

reminds me of this RichRebuilds video where he buys a Prius for $100 and tries to get it running

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

My partners Chrysler 200 needs a new battery too. It's mounted near the wheel well and you have to remove the front driver side wheel to access it. It's so impractical.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

Wrong sub. This was not dull.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, that's the easy part, that must be the 12 volt cranking battery you replaced, not the running battery...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/389188298094

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 6 points 17 hours ago

That is certainly true. It could always be worse. :-)