this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
34 points (90.5% liked)

World Politics

2380 readers
13 users here now


Political news from around the world.


No U.S, U.K, Ca, Aus, E.U politics

Posts must be related to Conflict, Politicians, Nation-states, Electoralism, or International Relations

Posts and Comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine is making massive headway against Russia right now. Putin's forces are crumbling all over the front line. So my question is this.

Should Ukraine keep hammering Russia even after they have regained all of their territory?

Because all Putin will do is lick his wounds and rebuild. (if his own people haven't taken him out that is)

I'm not saying stepping onto Russian soil, but simply continue to destroy Russia's military until they're so broken they will never recover quickly. If at all.

What do you think?

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 16 points 5 days ago

I'm all for it. Otherwise Russia learns nothing. Also more economic sanctions and keep them going just as long as they were fighting before retreat. Punish putin hard.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Here's a good joke on the subject:

Putin dies an predictably goes to hell. However, his whining annoys Satan who, after a few years, tells him to go back to Moscow and get some goddamn closure. Putin is suddenly back in a shiny modern Moscow, clean, orderly, everyone is happy. He goes to a bar and orders a vodka then asks the barman how things are going since the end of the Ukrainian war. The barman says that things are great, the country is once again a leading world power, their military is highly respected and the economy is the strongest it's ever been! Putin thinks that this is great and asks how much for the drink. The answer? Three hryvnia.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean what Russia needs is a deep change of regime and mentality.

Frankly, I doubt that reducing the country to ashes or close, would do that, on the contrary: the more a population feels threatened and vulnerable, the more it gathers around it and refuses to accept change.

A much smarter move would be on the contrary to be specifically kind to russians, why not by offering them asylum, papers, food, etc. Show them that their government is the problem, and that they have no reason to want war.

If they have military dominance, start forcing open passages within russian territory, protecting anyone who wants to escape. And obviously, be genuine about it, and do try to actually give them a proper life, don't start packing them in refugee camps and telling them to shut up.

That would weaken much more the russian government, make it much easier to trigger a regime change, and whoever escaped and wants to go back to Russia can, once the situation improves.

Feels much better than to just push Putin to force-recruit all civilians and send them to their deaths, with the ones not fighting starving to death instead.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Keep going, or at least credibly threaten to, russia will not back down otherwise.

Once russia stops their offensive then ok, but then there is the issue that russia can barely sustain an offensive anymore and is resorting to terrorism/lobbing bombs at Ukrainian civilian centers from behind their devastated frontlines.

Yes you can get really good at shooting them down, but at a certain point you do need to punch russia in the face as there is no other way to stop it.

I don't think Ukraine occupying parts of russia long term would be a good idea, it would create a huge opening for world powers to backstab Ukraine by saying that the war is all relative now since both sides are taking territory blah blah blah but that isn't my choice to make.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

Never overextend your supply lines and get yourself encircled.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Instead of directly marching into the Russian Federation, I'd home that nations in the area could clean out other Russian infestations like in Transistria in Moldova, South Ossetia and Abkhazia in Georgia.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

No. I think the Ukrainian people are tired of war, and when you become an existential threat to a nuclear power things get really messy.

Putin is old, and if Russia loses the war it's likely there will be a coup. Either way Putin won't be around when Russia has recovered it's military strength enough to attack anyone.

If Ukraine recovers all of it's territory and becomes part of NATO, there's no chance Russia can win. If they couldn't win with lukewarm support (at best) for Ukraine from NATO countries, they wouldn't dare attack Ukraine when there would a full military response from the rest of NATO.

Continuing the war after Ukraine recovered all of it's territory would just be throwing away lives needlessly.

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ukraine is making massive headway against Russia right now. Putin’s forces are crumbling all over the front line.

Where are you getting this from?
I've searched through multiple news sources on the war and can find nothing like this.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I am not sure. To me is seems more like they are barely holding up, which is already a massive feat, give the imbalance is something like 1:10 in favor of Russia in terms of men and ammunition. Last news I have is, Russia is gaining land on Ukraine, at a very slow pace. If only EU could kick Orban in the nuts and start properly supporting Ukraine...

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

I thought they had some russian soil already.

[–] Myron@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

The only way to beat/conquer the Russian identity is to exhaust it. History has not found a way of doing this. As yet.

Russians who go abroad and/or spend a lot of time among people in the West come to see a different way; one which they often and ultimately embrace, only to never return to their home country.

But we all know that 'travel' is not a cure for identity crisis. People travel and often learn nothing. Even those in the West.

The thing that brought the Russian culture to overthrow the Czarist rule was not a magical political theory that was absolutely amazing, but cruel oppression and ignorant government institutions for years on end, as they watched a burgeoning elite embrace and benefit from European values. Revolution often finds merely convenient means and theories, as an escape route.

If we assume the Czarist impulse which bled into the Soviet system will never be satiated in its hunger for expansion, all we can do is what one's older, wiser brother does to its enraged younger brother: put your hand on his forehead, extend your arm, and let him swing away.

Otherwise you have to beat him to a pulp. But usually younger brothers don't have nuclear arsenals.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

Yea just like palestinians has the right to kick all the invaders