this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
226 points (99.1% liked)

politics

28920 readers
1798 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Perhaps the most striking poll came Tuesday, ahead of Trump’s first State of the Union address of his second term, which beat his own record for the longest speech to Congress.

The Reuters-Ipsos poll showed 61% of Americans agreed that Trump has “become erratic with age.” Even 30% of Republicans agreed with that sentiment.

The Reuters-Ipsos poll also showed a decrease in the percentage of Americans who say Trump is “mentally sharp and able to deal with challenges.” That number has dropped from 54% in September 2023 to 45% today.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The pessimist in me wonders if those 30% of Republicans simply don't know what erratic means.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago

"no, I don't think old people are hot! What kind of poll asks if the president is erotic? Damn Bill Clinton tainting the office!"

I'm teaching my young children to read. It's not about too many syllables, You just won't find this in a picture book.

You've got to use words that would occur in a picture book.

[–] colforge@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I can almost guarantee that a good chunk of them don’t know the difference between erratic and eccentric. “Yeah he can be a little strange sometimes, so what?”

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

This is what he looked like on 9/11. Like, very obviously either just suffered a stroke or was actively having one on live TV. It's insane that people weren't demanding the 25th amendment be invoked right then and there. The fact that this was not front page news for weeks shows how complicit the media is.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

She's just sitting over there thinking of her life after he's dead.

Love to see it.

Additionally fuck her.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Now I can see the resemblance.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

God damn, those are some real life goblins

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Demons in skin suits? Lizard people?

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is that a lighting thing or did the midwife get a little too carried away with the forceps? He's missing some jaw bone.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

To me it looks like some weird mask, or bad makeup. Something Trump also shares in common.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Wait, we're all concerned that his mental acuity is increasing?

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

I would be concerned if he became more productive and effective at implementing their agenda.

[–] nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its a funny way to read that headline.

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

It read like that to me as well 😅

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That would be concerning... Or at least, ya know, a nice change of pace.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

His brain was always mush, even before he got up there in years.

He's one of those dumbasses that you always ask yourself: if he had dementia how would the layperson even be able to tell the difference between the crazy shit he did and said before and the crazy shit he does and says now?

I mean, it's still not clear to me whether he really thinks exercise is something that is bad for you. It's not clear to me if he really thinks stealth planes are invisible. It's not clear to me if he thinks people that seek asylum are somehow associated with insane asylums.

And so on.

[–] DarkDecay@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What this poll shows is that most people can't see mental problems in a failed business man accused of rape BEFORE they vote for him to become POTUS

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

TBF, I would have taken Biden in a coma over this guy.

I suspect my reasons for that are far different than the people that actively ignore(d) Pedonald's mental acuity issues.

Mine are because I trust the Democrats would have executed the line of succession protocols in a far more sane and orderly way than the cons are likely to and any risk/damage to America would be minimal.

Conversely, I think those that support Pedonald no matter how scrambled his brain is is because they want to maximize the damage against America as much as possible, which of course they call "making America great again". If he goes off the rails on the crazy, that's a benefit to speedrunning the very worst things.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Can't wait for his inevitable slip live on TV. He's gonna do or say something so dramatically heinous or stupid that even his most fervent supporters won't be able to ignore it.

It's a matter of weeks now, his frontal lobe is almost completely gone.

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

I like your optimism. But I think this can go on for a looong time. I'm actually betting on it, because I tend to lose bets. A rare occasion where winning and losing both counts as a win.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

We have an expression for that, it's called "Surely this . . . "

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 3 points 2 weeks ago

Nah I'm talking about something truly heinous, like what happened on the Island or to Epstein. Something he would boast about unfiltered and how he got away with it.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

this has happened enough times already

he could do whatever the fuck he wants

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

You're an optimist if you think that anything he could say would change things now. If he does something completely unforgivable, that's when they'll claim Alzheimer's and Vance takes the reins.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sure. I’m worried about this Nazis fuck being competent. If he were, he’d be a hell of a lot more dangerous.

Oh. They meant the concern over his mental acuity is increasing… not, uh, his mental acuity… increasing.

Yeah. It’s kinda hard not to notice he’s dumber than a box ‘o rocks and far less useful.

[–] Leather@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Acuity means sharpness. Mental acuity declines with age.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you.

I reread it like 3 times wondering who thinks Trump is getting smarter, and why we're worried about that.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's what I thought, but then I got it. Here, the headline without amateur word order ambiguity:

Polls show increasing concerns about Trump's mental acuity

Huh…we’ve known Trump was senile since before he was elected the first time. He’s just a talking point robot…arguably the best “politician” we’ve ever seen: Reagan 2.0.

If anyone recalls, Trump used the “I know what you are, but what am I?” strategy to switch the conversation to Biden’s cognitive ability from his own. 

…I guess it REALLY worked, because a lot of folks have memory-holed themselves.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I call bullshit. PEDOnald has never been "mentally sharp".

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had!

-His professor at Wharton

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Skin sack with a filthy mouth. I would not be surprised if they've turned him into a cyborg now to keep him going

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

His decline needs to speed up to like light speed.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

There's no way anyone will do anything unless he dies.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Polls.

Polls were something people considered, what feels like 1000 years ago.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Mental acuity decreasing, concerns increasing