this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
1353 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

82414 readers
3573 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”

more at: @feed@404media.co

https://tech.lgbt/@yjeanrenaud/116122129025921096

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 275 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Admittedly, this is cyberpunk as fuck. 

Should not be needed… but it’s a fucking cool solution. 

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 week ago

Install this on kali nethunter and make glassholes pay for their crimes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 148 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Wasnt there a ton of outrage and such incl people not being allowed on planes, back when google glass was released?

Why is it all OK now?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 94 points 1 week ago

Same reason our governments suck ass. Something unpopular tries to get passed again, and again, and again, and again, and eventually people get desensitized and worn out from trying to fight against it. That or it hits on the right time when people are distracted by something else bigger or more important.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I remember Google Glass itself receiving a ton of outrage actually: People hated it and anyone wearing one was made fun of ("glassholes" was a popular insult at the time).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

Many years of indoctrination. When Google glass was introduced, it was just 'a neat idea'. Now it's a product, and therefore it's clearly more trustworthy because someone is profiting from it. (/s)

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Years of privacy violations going deeper and deeper under pretend of "progress" and "pRoTeCt the cHiLdReN". I am glad that people started rebelling against Flock, and some removed their Amazon cameras following the Superbowl's ads, but that's not even close to how much we should be mad at these mass surveillance actors.

load more comments (1 replies)

There's a window of attention for public discourse and there's fatigue. We, as a group, can only be upset about so much. It's a tried tactic to just try to distract us with some crazy shit, like Trump did with the alien files. If one crazy thing comes up in the news, other stuff will drop from our radar. And that's why people try shit again and again and again. Always in the hope that this time people are distracted by other stuff or are finally worn down enough.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It still isn't OK.

It is just that the technology became so small, you can't differentiate with regular sunglasses anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 103 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Paywalled article. Here's the link to the app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.pocketpc.nearbyglasses

Edit: it's licensed under a license I never heard of. I'm curious, I don't understand why it was needed.

"Why draft new licenses? Until now, there has been no standardization of this kind of source code license, even though it has become increasingly common. This has resulted in confusing and overlapping licenses, which need to be analyzed one at a time. Lack of standardization has used up the time and resources of many in the software industry, as well as their lawyers. The objective of the PolyForm Project is standardization and reduction of costs for developers and users."

Seems like that exact XKCD about standards.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That license looks like Creative Commons Non-Comercial, which is not an open source license.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is an unpopular opinion, but using licenses to actively prevent commercial exploitation of voluntary communal labor is not a bad thing. I would even argue that allowing commercial exploitation of free, communally-maintained software is downright unethical. I don’t tolerate this pejorative “it’s not open source unless the rich and powerful can exploit it” bullshit.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 week ago

This is not a remotely unpopular opinion, sharing is awesome and corpos can suck it

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thank you, I see this so often and it always irks me.
"oh but you're limiting your reach with this license because companies won't want to us— boo fucking hoo, maybe not everything is about market-share and having a morbillion downloads.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 1 week ago (21 children)

You know what sucks?

In that AR glasses, in theory, are such an interesting technology with lots of potential, and certainly a piece of tech I would love to have and work with and on. Not to secretly record people, but to, well.. augment my field of view with whatever digital tools or displays I would like. It would be so useful

It's honestly kinda saddening to me that it most likely will get completely ruined by our current toxic relationship to technology. A step towards our ever increasing cyberdystopia, and not towards enchanting our limited lives

Obviously either way I don't trust Meta, but an open-hardware device running a FOSS AR system? It would be nice..

I still hold out hope that this somehow could be resolved, and I would love to contribute to open software for these devices. Maybe one day soon-ish I will. My expertise should be well applicable, after all

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 45 points 1 week ago (12 children)

It would be incredibly useful in construction. Having a digital overlay telling you exactly where to put up the framing for a separating wall, or an overlay showing the correct distance between screws, or where wires and pipes are inside a wall? There are so incredibly many awesome possible uses for AR in construction.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Drop the cameras and microphones and replace them with a couple accelerometers and gyros. Paired with your phone's GPS tracking, the glasses can tell where you're looking without actually seeing anything. You can get handy features like a floating 'turn here' sign over your exit while driving with GPS navigation without recording anyone or anything at any time. Better battery life, too.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tbh I don't even mind cameras that much if they were entirely controlled by the individuals themselves. I have a much bigger issue with it when you're streaming my facial recognition data to Evil Megacorp 2™ servers that also feed directly to the "Not Spying.. Again" agency, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Open season on meta wearers when?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Perfect response. Record someone without consent, it should be the last time those glasses are wearable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago (16 children)

I agree but the biggest defense for this is to always assume you're being recorded when in public even if you're not. You never know.

The issue becomes relevant in private spaces, to me. Nobody with smart glasses is coming into my home.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't this boil down to self-censorship in public? Better not critizise the government in public becaus you never know whos waring smart glasses...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I know next to nothing about the glasses, but would they be vulnerable to anything the Flipper Zero is capable of doing?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How hard can you throw it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] giacomo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

depends on what you know about flipper zero.

The app scans for smart glasses’ distinctive Bluetooth signatures and sends a push alert if it detects a potential pair of glasses in the local area.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Doesn't work 😮‍💨 push "start scanning" and nothing happens.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's supposed to ask for Bluetooth access at that point, did it?

Also from the GitHub page:

if you don't see the scan starting, you might need to enable Foreground Service on your particular phone in the Settings menu [in the app's settings, not the phone's]

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Now you need a powerful laser pointer to ruin the glasses camera. Careful not to blind the wearer.

[–] jjj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

That was way more on point than I expected.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Apparently the lidar in some cars can damage cameras and are safe for eyes.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago

meta is all about surveillance cant expect anything less

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd fork this just to name it more appropriately: "Glasshole radar"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plateee@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago

I wonder if you could run it on a dedicated piece of gear like FlockYou...

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Now if they can just notify you that some asshole is recording you on their cell phone instead of reading reddit. probably 0.001% of people out there stalking are using smart glasses.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

It sucks that it seems like as time goes on the best thing my phone will be good for is alerting me to other nearby tech to avoid.

load more comments
view more: next ›