this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
1256 points (97.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

10959 readers
2722 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

next time I hear "there is just too many (brown) people" i swear

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alejandra@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

It’s a reminder that large problems are often tied to concentrated power. Holding systems accountable while still pushing for collective change is probably the most constructive path forward.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 hours ago

that feels, for some reason, profound.
I mean, sure let it be 200 or 400, 1000. It's still a rounding error compared to all of humanity.

maybe that is why there is a period of prosperity after large wars. The losing side being wiped out reduces that number by half and everyone can breathe a bit more freely.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

They'll find new executives, bud. Executives are just the lackeys for shareholders and the board of directors. A new one will grow for each one lost.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Giving up hasn't worked yet.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

I'm just saying the aim isn't the most effective. Shooting someone's foot certainly will hamper someone, but the pain will go away eventually. Gotta aim for a more lethal part of the body

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I'm sure the corporations beneath these people will simply evaporate and everything will go perfectly fine.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you took out certain key people you would absolutely change the course of history. Probably a certain 5-10. Maybe less. Who? No idea.

[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Hell, look at all the shit epstein was involved with and think about how much better the world would be if he was baby hitler'd

[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

ok but three "literally" is too many.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago

These few people / companies destroying the planet: BLAME THE CONSUMER!

The amount of fucking everything up they do in a day is more than I do in a lifetime.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

These people have physical bodies

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Fewer than a single box of ammo.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Valid. We could be efficient, and use one bullet each, or we could go for mayhem. Mayhem creates better historical photos that are more effective in warning future dipshits. That does require lots of ammo.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

That's not efficient. You gotta line them up for real efficiency.

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Never underestimate the psychological impact of the look and sound of a guillotine.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

There is something to be said for the sun glinting off the blade.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago

If only there was like a deck of cards with their faces on it.

[–] stray@pawb.social 16 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/

Sometimes I like to gaze lovingly into their faces while writing their names in my diary.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That page 404 errors for me. Here's an alt:

https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Something to remember about the Forbes List: the most terrible people of all, aren't even on it. There is a level of wealth that floats above mere billionaires, for which there almost isn't even a category. Forbes knows not to mention these families in the context of some tawdry popularity contest among nouveau riche Techno Trash. They are mostly centuries old multi-generational wealth like monarchies, the Rothschilds, sheikhs, organized crime families, dictators, etc.

They aren't on the list, but they hold the real wealth, and more importantly, the real power. Everything else is an illusion of their making.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

So, vampires. They're vampires.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

My understanding of it is that its not really some conspiracy to hide the top wealth; the forbes lists are all opt- in. They reach out to a bunch of Uber wealthy, people, and those who want in send back bios and stats for them to rank and publish.

At least that's the way it was explained to me. I dated an heiress for a while, and at one point her dad told me hed only ever had his name on the list for one year, and that was as part of the 'debut campaign' for his second wife.

Of you look ar the list it makes sense. It's mostly the new rich, people still seaking validation and status from their wealth, the sociopaths and a lot of the tech bilionaires like elon and zuckerberg who treat it like a competition, and people who benefit from the name recognition and status perception for their company, like all the fashion and design company owners using it to help associate their brands with luxury, and the investment banker types like Bloomberg, ken griffin, etc, who use it to show success of their companies and get other rich people to invest with them.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 25 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (8 children)

I said nothing of the sort. But I ask once again: If we execute these 90 people, will that make us stop burning oil? Is it at least a helpful step down the path of stopping to burn oil?

If not, then please just don't act as though these 90 people are all we have to overcome to save the planet.

[–] DirtSona@feddit.org 18 points 13 hours ago

Of course something will happen. If the bosses or big corporations would be killed constantly, the next in line would be thinking about changing things. Just remember Luigi.

https://factually.co/fact-checks/health/luigi-mangione-healthcare-accessibility-impact-288343

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago

It costs 7.5% of GDP to halt climate change.

But each 12.5% of GDP is lost per +1°C

The problem is that the people who need to pay are not the people who will be most affected.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›