this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
232 points (87.2% liked)

Games

47821 readers
1204 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zecg@lemmy.world 111 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

bigoted reviews posted on games’ Steam pages, which can hugely affect sales for their developers; and Steam curators (self-appointed taste-makers on the platform) directing campaigns against games they perceive to lean left or pursue inclusion.

This fucking shit again. Reviews affect sales? Well, good. You don't get to carefully select a few most-read outlets who'll give you the thumb up. Also, chud curators are "directing" only those who follow them. This argument is about a failing industry that'd like to control what can be said about their products. Make no mistake, Steam's openness in this regard is, for me as a customer at least, added value.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 144 points 1 month ago (7 children)

To be perfectly honest, the odds of me buying a game are significantly higher if I see reviews about “toxic femininity” or “woke politics”

I use those "wokism tiers" that you usually see from bigoted idiots to check out new games that I'll probably like

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That is literally how I discovered Signalis. It was included in one of those anti-woke curators' "not recommended" list, then I saw that it was an indie title, and overwhelmingly positive... I was sold immediately.

[–] Goatboy@lemmy.today 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have to be way down the rabbit hole to think Signalis is too woke. Nothing it does would have been out of place in '02 or so.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Depends on where the curator draws the line, and you can't apply sane criteria to what they consider "too woke". Sometimes a game is put on a woke list because it has a female lead, or a physically strong female character, or non-heteronormative character dynamics, or people of color are present in it... I've seen one that was marked as woke because it referenced climate change and climate action. I think it was some popular shooter or something.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I occasionally go through the lists posted by chud curators for small indie titles that would have escaped my notice. I don't have time to scrutinize every title on Steam, but these guys seemingly have infinite time to ensure every unheard of title with a case of LGBTQ+ representation gets criticism from them. Ironically, they're fantastic for finding small, progressive passion projects I would have otherwise missed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with that, but negative reviews also affect the algorithm. If enough of those reviews drown out positive ones it will reduce the chance you see the game at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're not just trying to remove negative reviews for being negative though, this is about bad actors weaponizing the review system to push bigotry. That should not be platformed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 100 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Steam has a serious problem with a lack of moderation, which has made it a very attractive platform for fascists. Gamergate never ended, and remember that began with Steve Bannon realizing he could exploit gamer outrage to push propaganda. They keep inventing new scandals to repeat their past success.

One of my favorite games had a very minor patch to revise some cringier elements from early in the game's lifespan. Years later, the forum is still unusuable because it's been colonized by right-wing weirdos with 0.3 hours on record who have dedicated their lives to crying about a game they never cared about pre-patch, because they saw it as an opportunity to push their propaganda.

[–] Zanshi@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 17 points 1 month ago
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

While I do question a lot of the changes they made to Skullgirls 2nd Encore, there was one context where censoring panty shots was entirely understandable.

Filia was one of the characters censored. She's a sixteen year old schoolgirl, and while this may be a stretch, her name sounds like a reference to "paedophilia", which makes the fact that some of her animation frames and concept art were originally drawn upskirted with clearly exposed panties even more problematic.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 68 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Steam provides the forums; not mods. The developers are supposed to moderate their forums. The only forums I actually see moderated are the Steam specific ones (like the support board). Game specific ones are hit or miss. Most devs just seem to ignore that they even exist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (13 children)

The main reason Valve doesn’t step in on these is they have a firm philosophy of giving the community the tools to form their own outcomes, rather than directing them in every issue. So they might be dissatisfied with people writing “Woke TRASH!” braindead reviews, but also not want to take action on them.

The least they’ve done is remove the clown award so people have less incentive to troll. But I’d also like them to implement community blocklists; If you nag a game for “Having/not having LGBT representation”, you go on a blocklist 90% of the community is using.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 month ago

They also famously allow you to work on whatever you want, I doubt many Valve employees want to spend their days cleaning shit like that

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They also have guidelines for "user generated content" which includes reviews, and you can report people for violating those guidelines.

Sure Valve does not pay for moderators to check things proactively. I quite like that they don't have AI or some other half-assed attempt at "moderation" like other platforms have. I hate the way that the whole Internet has moved to censor "fuck" and made up the word "unalive" because the automated systems of platforms I don't even use have decided they are the arbitora of what language is allowed.

I think the responsibility to monitor reviews should lie with whoever controls the Steam page: I would assume the publisher most of the time? The publisher and developer should be looking at reviews anyways. Add in the ability for users to vote reviews as helpful or unhelpful and I think it's one of the better systems left on the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] imecth@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago

The main reason Valve doesn't step in is because it would cost them money. Moderating content is expensive as hell and these corporations will bend themselves backwards finding any and every way to avoid it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It does get tiresome going to steam threads and seeing the same copy pasted "don't ruin the game with woke shit" post up voted to the top.

There's a pencil thin line between farming clown emoji and overt bigotry getting pumped to the top of the reviews section by bad faith actors.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

They removed the clown reaction, as well as the ability to get points for receiving reactions.
If that ever was an excuse, it no longer is.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 37 points 1 month ago (16 children)

For anybody saying "it's not a problem, just moderate it yourself", look at Relooted's steam forum. There are more than 700 threads there and most of them are really not kind. Tell me how you're going to moderate that.

Just put yourself in the shoes of game publishers or studios that make a game which goes against the grind and gets attacked like Relooted is being attacked. Would you want to employ somebody just to moderate the forums? Should the onus be on the forum owners or should it be on the forum providers (Valve)? Do you think this has no effect on the types of games being released?

I mean, look at this game Tyrone vs Cops 2. Is this OK? What do you think the forum discussions look like. Are they OK? If it's only devs that should moderate their forums, that means the KKK could make game about water lillies and then have their forums be the meeting ground for white power discussions. They won't be offended after-all. That's OK?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago

For anyone else not familiar, here's the first line of Relooted's description:

Reclaim real African artifacts from Western museums in this Africanfuturist heist game.

The forum is full of exactly what you'd expect.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The reason it got this bad was because they didn't nip it in the bud sooner. If they had been more proactive from the start, there wouldn't be 700+ threads.

At this point, just nuke them all and ban everyone who made a bigoted troll thread. It's gonna be a game of whack-a-mole for a little while, but once you start handing out bans, the trolling will start die down.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Compare this to fedi, shared block lists for admins helps a lot.

Should each game have to clean their forum individually?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

For anybody saying "it's not a problem, just moderate it yourself"

I'm of the opposite opinion. It's a much bigger problem than just Steam community moderation and it needs to be addressed more broadly. (Monkey's paw curls)

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 month ago (9 children)

for a more recent example, the negative reviews under Relooted are fucking sickening. one of the top ones is a joke making fun of George Floyd’s death.

what does steam do? nothing. valve is one of the most profitable companies per employee out there, and they have no pressure from investors to botch their work, they could absolutely moderate.

they actively choose not to, because despite what bootlickers on lemmy would have you believe, gabe newell is a libertarian dipshit who values "free speech" over the safety of marginalized people.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are guidelines on Steam that ban such content, and you can report people for violating them.

So no, Steam does not do "nothing" as you claim. A very basic Internet search can confirm that.

Even better, users can rate reviews as helpful or unhelpful. Which is great for a wider variety of reasons, but is also good for reviews that get into a grey area or use dog whistles to hide their true intentions.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

as the article mentions, if you’d bothered to read it, steam rarely enforces their guidelines, which is the problem here

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The article is behind a paywall. Do they have any statistics or evidence backing that sentiment or is it just vibes?

You can find articles and reddit posts claiming this same exact thing going back years, and yet personally when I go through the store and look through reviews it's really hard for me to come across hate speech, especially if you don't specifically look at reviews that have been downvoted to hell. It's never going to be perfect, but I encounter less hate speech on Steam than most other platforms.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i didn't have any paywall, maybe it's a regional thing? here's a version that shouldn't have it.

anyways, here's a screenshot of the Relooted review i talked about. if you check the game's negative reviews and sort by most pertinent, it's the 3rd one. it was here yesterday, and despite me reporting it, it's still here today, and in fact has been here since february 11th. as time of writing, it has 373 people who found it useful, and 115 who found it funny. some of the comments under that review are critical, but most just say "based" and the like.

CW: screenshot of a racist review, makes fun of George Floyd's deathScreenshot of a negative Steam review, with 0.2 hours played. It reads: Ugh, what a game. It stinks. I cant breathe, I caaant breathe!

it's an anecdotal evidence, but as you said, "you can find articles and reddit posts claiming this same exact thing going back years", doesn't that mean it's a recurring problem?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

If you pump enough money into Linux gaming and do regular sales, a lot can be forgiven apparently. Steam Discussions are one of the most miserable places on the internet I go to semi-regularly and I don't understand how Steam just gets a pass for the stuff that's normal there.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 10 points 1 month ago

pressure from investors

This unfortunately trades one group of scumbags for another.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Fucking hell. You were not kidding. This was posted five days ago! The comments on that review are even more vile, to the point where I don't even think I can show them here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Reminder that The Guardian is a dogshit paper that pretty much systematically misgender trans people and keeps tripling down on backing up TERFs. You don't get to talk shit about the bigots when you're among them.

[–] rozlav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

I would very much like to read something about it !

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

You don't get to talk shit about the bigots when you're among them.

I disagree, bad people can still make good arguments against different bad people. If the shit against bigots is valid, let it be talked.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I've tried contacting gaming press about this. I contacted Valve (several times) citing their own rules, screenshots of blatant transgressions and they repeatedly closed my ticket and ignored me. I avoid buying games directly from Steam now. If I can find the screenshots later I'll update my post.

Edit: So here is the ticket I opened (this was -months- after repeatedly reporting someone spamming the N-word in the Official Steam Deck group chat for weeks).

Valve customer support is the best, hurrr derrrr

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Funksylvania@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago

Breaking News: Bigots increasingly comfortable, some mods bigots too.

It’s a shame there isn’t real moderation when people feel harassed, but I no longer care about those reviews as a consumer anyway. A negative review by some loser probably means I’ll like it more.

And I continue to support challengers to monopolies. Hope Steam gets a real competitor someday so I can take my money elsewhere.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I agree valves platform moderation is terrible but getting upset over some negative reviews from "charlietweet" and "toowoke" is bubblewrap levels of soft.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Part of the reason I don't play many multi-player games is the idiocy and racism

load more comments
view more: next ›