this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
125 points (85.7% liked)

Games

46311 readers
1269 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

It does get tiresome going to steam threads and seeing the same copy pasted "don't ruin the game with woke shit" post up voted to the top.

There's a pencil thin line between farming clown emoji and overt bigotry getting pumped to the top of the reviews section by bad faith actors.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 38 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Steam has a serious problem with a lack of moderation, which has made it a very attractive platform for fascists. Gamergate never ended, and remember that began with Steve Bannon realizing he could exploit gamer outrage to push propaganda. They keep inventing new scandals to repeat their past success.

One of my favorite games had a very minor patch to revise some cringier elements from early in the game's lifespan. Years later, the forum is still unusuable because it's been colonized by right-wing weirdos with 0.3 hours on record who have dedicated their lives to crying about a game they never cared about pre-patch, because they saw it as an opportunity to push their propaganda.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

While I do question a lot of the changes they made to Skullgirls 2nd Encore, there was one context where censoring panty shots was entirely understandable.

Filia was one of the characters censored. She's a sixteen year old schoolgirl, and while this may be a stretch, her name sounds like a reference to "paedophilia", which makes the fact that some of her animation frames and concept art were originally drawn upskirted with clearly exposed panties even more problematic.

[–] Zanshi@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 5 points 2 hours ago
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 19 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

For anybody saying "it's not a problem, just moderate it yourself", look at Relooted's steam forum. There are more than 700 threads there and most of them are really not kind. Tell me how you're going to moderate that.

Just put yourself in the shoes of game publishers or studios that make a game which goes against the grind and gets attacked like Relooted is being attacked. Would you want to employ somebody just to moderate the forums? Should the onus be on the forum owners or should it be on the forum providers (Valve)? Do you think this has no effect on the types of games being released?

I mean, look at this game Tyrone vs Cops 2. Is this OK? What do you think the forum discussions look like. Are they OK? If it's only devs that should moderate their forums, that means the KKK could make game about water lillies and then have their forums be the meeting ground for white power discussions. They won't be offended after-all. That's OK?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 hours ago

For anyone else not familiar, here's the first line of Relooted's description:

Reclaim real African artifacts from Western museums in this Africanfuturist heist game.

The forum is full of exactly what you'd expect.

[–] grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago

For anybody saying "it's not a problem, just moderate it yourself"

I'm of the opposite opinion. It's a much bigger problem than just Steam community moderation and it needs to be addressed more broadly. (Monkey's paw curls)

[–] missingno@fedia.io 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The reason it got this bad was because they didn't nip it in the bud sooner. If they had been more proactive from the start, there wouldn't be 700+ threads.

At this point, just nuke them all and ban everyone who made a bigoted troll thread. It's gonna be a game of whack-a-mole for a little while, but once you start handing out bans, the trolling will start die down.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Or it becomes a popular trolling target with a cry of "they can't take us all down" and it gets worse.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 2 points 1 hour ago

If it continues to get bad enough, you can lock the forum down from new accounts so they can't make alts.

[–] doublah@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, look at this game Tyrone vs Cops 2. Is this OK?

It's probably filled with vile stuff, so I simply won't go there. There's awful stuff to be found everywhere on the internet if you seek it out, you can just not go there.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 2 hours ago

Sure, I won't travel to Gaza and say "wow, so many dead people here" and act surprised, but if I stumble upon a dead body on a playground, you betcha it's at least a little surprising.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

Stems need a better tools to moderate. It's a pain to manually go thru.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 37 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Steam provides the forums; not mods. The developers are supposed to moderate their forums. The only forums I actually see moderated are the Steam specific ones (like the support board). Game specific ones are hit or miss. Most devs just seem to ignore that they even exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Reminder that The Guardian is a dogshit paper that pretty much systematically misgender trans people and keeps tripling down on backing up TERFs. You don't get to talk shit about the bigots when you're among them.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Do you have evidence of this? I thought the Guardian was pretty left-wing?

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

There's so much Guardian posted on lemmy that I feel they're spamming us.

[–] rozlav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 8 hours ago

I would very much like to read something about it !

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 40 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

The main reason Valve doesn’t step in on these is they have a firm philosophy of giving the community the tools to form their own outcomes, rather than directing them in every issue. So they might be dissatisfied with people writing “Woke TRASH!” braindead reviews, but also not want to take action on them.

The least they’ve done is remove the clown award so people have less incentive to troll. But I’d also like them to implement community blocklists; If you nag a game for “Having/not having LGBT representation”, you go on a blocklist 90% of the community is using.

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Does the clown award still exist on profiles? I used to get added by randoms everytime and they always had the clown award because that's the easiest way for people to mark someone as a scammer

[–] imecth@fedia.io 6 points 5 hours ago

The main reason Valve doesn't step in is because it would cost them money. Moderating content is expensive as hell and these corporations will bend themselves backwards finding any and every way to avoid it.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 19 points 8 hours ago

They also famously allow you to work on whatever you want, I doubt many Valve employees want to spend their days cleaning shit like that

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

They also have guidelines for "user generated content" which includes reviews, and you can report people for violating those guidelines.

Sure Valve does not pay for moderators to check things proactively. I quite like that they don't have AI or some other half-assed attempt at "moderation" like other platforms have. I hate the way that the whole Internet has moved to censor "fuck" and made up the word "unalive" because the automated systems of platforms I don't even use have decided they are the arbitora of what language is allowed.

I think the responsibility to monitor reviews should lie with whoever controls the Steam page: I would assume the publisher most of the time? The publisher and developer should be looking at reviews anyways. Add in the ability for users to vote reviews as helpful or unhelpful and I think it's one of the better systems left on the internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zecg@lemmy.world 78 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

bigoted reviews posted on games’ Steam pages, which can hugely affect sales for their developers; and Steam curators (self-appointed taste-makers on the platform) directing campaigns against games they perceive to lean left or pursue inclusion.

This fucking shit again. Reviews affect sales? Well, good. You don't get to carefully select a few most-read outlets who'll give you the thumb up. Also, chud curators are "directing" only those who follow them. This argument is about a failing industry that'd like to control what can be said about their products. Make no mistake, Steam's openness in this regard is, for me as a customer at least, added value.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 101 points 11 hours ago (11 children)

To be perfectly honest, the odds of me buying a game are significantly higher if I see reviews about “toxic femininity” or “woke politics”

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

I agree with that, but negative reviews also affect the algorithm. If enough of those reviews drown out positive ones it will reduce the chance you see the game at all.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 10 hours ago (10 children)

for a more recent example, the negative reviews under Relooted are fucking sickening. one of the top ones is a joke making fun of George Floyd’s death.

what does steam do? nothing. valve is one of the most profitable companies per employee out there, and they have no pressure from investors to botch their work, they could absolutely moderate.

they actively choose not to, because despite what bootlickers on lemmy would have you believe, gabe newell is a libertarian dipshit who values "free speech" over the safety of marginalized people.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Fucking hell. You were not kidding. This was posted five days ago! The comments on that review are even more vile, to the point where I don't even think I can show them here.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

There are guidelines on Steam that ban such content, and you can report people for violating them.

So no, Steam does not do "nothing" as you claim. A very basic Internet search can confirm that.

Even better, users can rate reviews as helpful or unhelpful. Which is great for a wider variety of reasons, but is also good for reviews that get into a grey area or use dog whistles to hide their true intentions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

What do you want Steam to do? Be the judge and executioner of what lives and what dies? There is no agreed upon guidelines for what is chud behavior and not so how does Valve make that call?

VALUE PER EMPLOYEE MEANS NOTHING IN THIS CONTEXT. You are saying that fact to imply "rich people need to be the adults if they are going to have that money" and that is absolutely Monarch/Authoritarian enabler thinking. Fuck that.

Valve is not responsible for the shit other people say. Report them if you don't like it. As with democracy, with enough votes things will change. But one person mad at what another person says so they plead to a central authority to shut it down? The Internet has seen this decision turn into legal battles over speech after one trolling shithead decides to use the system against innocent people.

Stop listening to racists and this all goes away.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What do you want Steam to do?

Moderate, like every other half-decent platform does.

[–] doublah@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 hours ago

Every platform of Steam's size or bigger has mostly replaced human moderation with AI at this point because it's the only way to moderate at that scale.

And I'd rather a few anti-woke weirdos get to post their by default hidden curator reviews than have to start saying "unalive" in Steam forums.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 9 points 8 hours ago

pressure from investors

This unfortunately trades one group of scumbags for another.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Moderate your own forum, honestly its kinda based of Valve to be as hands off as they are. You set your own guidelines rather than having Valve force their own on you. It makes sense too given the variety of games on Steam.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›