this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
30 points (96.9% liked)

retrocomputing

6146 readers
182 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Geos was great on the C64, but completely useless, lol

I didn't know there was a PC version!

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

was it though? I guess it depend on having a mouse, a second floppy drive and a printer. You could thus use it as a desktop publishing platform, or spreadsheet calculator.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

Nope, it was slow to load and use compared with text-based software for doing the same thing back in the day. An Amstrad PCW was better for actual work

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

ViewMAX or GEM. Both from Digital Research.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I remember OS/2 by IBM which looked like Windows 3.11, and OS/2 Warp which looked like Windows 95. There were probably others.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 4 points 23 hours ago

A great resource when looking for older GUI shells/OS's is Toastytech: http://toastytech.com/guis/index.html

Lots of info and screenshots to browse through there. And if you don't find what you're looking for you might find something else that's interesting :)

DOS Shell was something like that. Not much in the way of functionality, but it was graphical…ish.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

The first computer my dad bought, back in the late '80s, was mostly a DOS machine that also came with a mouse-driven GUI called GEM.

I don't know if it ran on top of DOS, though. It booted directly from its own set of disks.

[–] mech@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It looked like this:

It was pretty similar to modern Windows but without taskbar or Start menu.
Instead, you had a main window called "program manager" with icons in it to start other programs.
Do you have any specific questions about it?

[–] evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is that? I don’t think that’s what I had in mind. I think it’s DESQview I was trying to think of. Anyway, not important.. it was just driving me nuts I could not remember.

[–] mech@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, I think I misunderstood your question.
And I had literally never heard of any Windows 3 alternatives up to now.

[–] evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, I was quite vague. I think there are multiple right answers.. but I recalled one starting w/a 'D' and that’s what I was trying to recall.

[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I thought your question was clear for what it's worth. If it was Windows 3.0 era you're probably looking for ViewMAX (from the same company as DR-DOS, which was an MS-DOS compatible operating system, maybe that's where the 'D' comes from?). I vaguely remember reading (or maybe watching) a good feature about it online a while ago but I can't find it unfortunately.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Digital Research DOS, of my memory is right

[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Correct, yes (I meant the 'D' evenwicht said they recalled it starting with if that wasn't clear, indeed for Digital Research, in fact I had to look up DR-DOS to remember the name ViewMAX).

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

O, wow, ViewMaxx... I had completely forgotten that.

Sure would like to get a collection of this stuff and run in a VM just for fun.

HP had an internal system just to make a simple GUI in DOS, forget what it was called. Just gave you buttons for a dozen programs.

[–] teft@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there a specific screenshot you're thinking of?

[–] evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I figured if I could recall the name I could get a nostalgic fix by searching it. I found this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DESQview

I recall DESQview was much lighter weight and better performing than Windows, but had limitations. I did not recall that the windows were text only within, but that’s starting to fill some holes in my memory.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

You may be thinking of DesqViewX:

https://lunduke.substack.com/p/desqviewx-the-forgotten-mid-1990s

Edit for a little personal anecdote: ran a 2-line (2400, then later 14.4k) WWIV BBS under this on a 386sx in the 90s. What an awesome time that was.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

q. name one 'os' that sucked donkey balls getting a functional tcp/ip stack runnin'

[–] evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In those days, DOS was the OS. Windows and DESQview were just window manager apps that ran other apps.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

hence the single quotes.. i was just pullin a jeopardy

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh Trumpet something... The hell of getting a stack back then

WinSock Trumpet (yea, that was on Win 3.1)