this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
385 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31398 readers
2672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Per anti-vax conspiracy theorist RFK, Jr., Trump promised him control of our public Health agencies in deal for him to drop out and endorse Trump.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Iron Lung futures through the roof!!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn’t notice that was a mirror at first. Was like: are there two people in that thing?

Then I was like whytf you want to stare at your own face all day? Then I realized this would let you see who is standing there talking to you. Thanks for attending my TED talk.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

As a lot of people discovered over the pandemic, staring at their own face is the only thing they want, I've seen a lot of people pinning their own camera in zoom to have their own face full screen the whole time

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If they are a death cult, and want to die so bad, why don't they... You know... Do that?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They are a type of death cult, they just aren't the ones they want dead. It's "us." :/

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No I get that. But all these policies impact the death cult too, and I don't know if they're unaware of it, or they're all like 'eh, worth it.'

And if they're like 'eh, worth it' then why the crap do they need these policies when they can lower the population amongst themselves? I would be willing to bet that we could even criminalize something like planning mass death by unconventional means, and maybe even make it a crime punishable by death to make sure their death cult includes enough death.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think a very very large portion of them are antivax, they see it as not only unnecessary, but harmful. Tie that into the corporate mandates to get vaccinated which they viewed as oppressive and this is just exactly the kind of stuff they'd love to see. I don't think death is a thought at all in regards to this, if anything they consider it a safety measure.

I'm sure there's not an insignificant portion of them also thinking "anything that triggers a liberal is great in my book!"

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Your last point is the most obvious one, but the most confusing.

Progressives debate everything, and in their mind anything that is arguable and debating equals arguing, so everything can actually trigger a progressive. All they really have to say is "some people are better than others because we say so."

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Some excerpts:

The co-chair of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s transition team promoted the debunked theory that vaccines cause autism in a CNN interview Wednesday. He also said Trump ally Robert F. Kennedy Jr., hopes to get “data” through a Trump administration to have vaccines pulled “off the market.”

Kennedy told supporters earlier this week that Trump had promised to give him “control” over key public health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The key that I think I’m — you know, that President Trump has promised me is — is control of the public health agencies,” Kennedy said in a livestream, video of which CNN obtained. He cited the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health, among others."

[–] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There an Ezra Klein interview with Maggie Haberman, who has followed trump closely from the start in which she says leading the American people is not what he’s interested in. The constitution and rule of law is not what he’s interested in. It’s power. He’s not keen to dive into those other two things.

He’s also way more erratic and impulsive since getting shot at.

[–] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Also, have we talked yet about how RFK appears to have nearly - if not fully - admitted to illegal corruption?

Sorry to link to a PDF, but see p.8 of this government summary of corruption law: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44447/9

While supporting a candidate is not illegal, and nor is offering financially valuable support if within limits or through a super PAC, providing value in exchange for a government position - quid pro quo - is illegal. RFK's exchange of value is not merely supporting Trump, but actively trying to remove himself from the ballot in swing states to materially alter the election. Not illegal except it appears RFK has just admitted he was promised a position in Trump's administration.

So how do we know it's quid pro quo? We know leaks before RFK's endorsement were that he was shopping himself to the Harris and Trump campaigns. He didn't explicitly say "in exchange for," but it's almost certain that's what happened, and that there are witnesses to it who could testify or be subpoenaed.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s what Trump publicly promised Musk, a position. So if it’s really illegal no one is doing shit about it.

That's an excellent point, and since we know Musk has spent over $100 million so far trying to get Trump elected, it's a lot easier case to make (if there really was a quid pro quo promise made).

[–] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah but these guys are above the law, so it won't matter.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is surreal, in a bad way, to watch as the US might actually vote to put itself in mortal danger.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, not just itself. Pandemics don't respect borders.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 16 points 2 years ago

Same goes for fascism...

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It’s a good thing then that Donald and his cronies handled the last pandemic so well /s

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

Sure, but ThE iMmIGrAnTs!!! ThE tRaNsGeNdEr!!! THE WOKE!!!!

Uggghhh...I hate people.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

wanna bet this guy doesn't believe in soap?

or that soap is the devil?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wait, wouldn't Freedom-loving Republicans ban mandatory vaccines but still allow them because Freedom?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

the “freedom” they love so much is the “freedom” to tell other people what to do

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The party of small government and freedom.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I also think we should yank vaccines off the market. They should be free, why are we selling them?

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"on the market" means available to us, regardless of whether we would have to pay for them or not. They don't want us to have access to vaccines at all. This is not a joke.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Oh I know what he meant.

[–] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why wouldn't you take health advice from this guy? I mean, apart from the fact that he has already caused disease outbreaks to kill many people?

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Can't just have their voters dying next go round

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Goddammit....i just gets worse and worse!

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Ya I am sure it would be one hell of a shit show.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

These people are deliberately trying to harm the country so that Russia can win the century.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile China is laughing its ass off because its century has already begun. If Russia loses, China wins. If the US loses, China also wins.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

More efficient than death camps! Let the viruses do their work for them.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

MAPA

Make Polio Great Again

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

AOL - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for AOL:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Wikipedia search about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.aol.com/trump-transition-co-chair-spouts-141336415.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support