this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
266 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

14821 readers
1233 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 12 points 8 hours ago

Third shift? Night jobs? What are those?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh, one of those websites that continually redraws the content to try to display more ads

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The noscript browser extension can be handy on sites like that.

(I set the default to be trusted though, otherwise too many sites break)

[–] kimchi@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Reading the Houston city council discussion, it looks like they intend to curfew standup (platform) e-scooters. But the ordinance uses the term "micromobility device", which is not really a legal definition of anything, and could include lots of things (even 50cc scooters). Hopefully the ordinance could be amended to clarify.

Since the vast majority of these will be app-rented e-scooters (ERYD/Lime), and those companies already operate under franchise agreements with the city, it seems like the easier path would be to put hours-of-operation limits on the rental companies.

Not that I think limiting e-scooters is a good idea, either.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

That’s ok, I’m sure anyone using them for transportation can easily use Houston’s excellent subway, right?

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 11 points 12 hours ago

Sound the alarm - we need to broadcast a dumb motherfucker alert

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

Does this include all types of mobility devices like the one below?

1000054654

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 95 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The city’s enforcement data from 2021-25 shows 129 scooters seized, 74 impounded, 53 vendor warnings, 13 vendor citations, 3,016 rider warnings, 51 rider citations, five guns seized and eight arrests. No deaths were reflected in the city's data. Meanwhile, Houston last year recorded its deadliest year on record for vehicle drivers, passengers and pedestrians, with 345 people killed on Houston-area streets, a record high after two years of declines.

over 300 people died last year because of car accidents vs 0 from e-bikes and scooters in the past 4 years and you're gonna put a curfew on the e-bikes???

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 hours ago

I don't think traffic safety is the reason. I think it's crimes being done.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Cars are a lost cause but maybe we can keep those e-bike deaths at 0 by banning them /s

[–] Steve@communick.news 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

"One death is too many!"

The second death:
"Fuckit. Whatever. It's hopeless."

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 93 points 18 hours ago

Man, wait until this mayor finds out about how many people get killed by cars between 8pm and 4am

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago

Bikes are too much freedom, so they are woke.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 14 hours ago

They need to enforce where they can ride. The sidwalk going 30mph is not the correct answer.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 19 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder if there's a racial or class component here. Can't have the poors or the DEIs getting around. /s

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

The thing is, they want poor people to have cars. Sure, they can't reasonably afford them, but they have to have them, so they take a loan and are stuck repaying it. This means they can't quit their jobs or do anything that could hurt their income. The banks also get to make extra income off of the loan.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 13 hours ago

I don't know what it's like in Houston and I know it's known for being car centric but where I live the Uber eats / door dash / whatever economy basically runs on those ebikes.

You can also guess the type of person riding them.

[–] dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexus 32 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

making people wear helmets and giving them protected bike lanes would be a way better solution

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 33 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, remember all those people killed in that e-bike ramming attack in, was it the Netherlands?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago

Couldn't be in the Netherlands, any terrorist ebike is preventively thrown into the canal. Every other ebike too, just in case.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know what it's like in Houston but here in Toronto the entire food delivery industry would pretty much come to a stand still without e-bikes. do they kill people? no. are they dangerous? I'm sorry but with the way some of those dudes drive those things on sidewalks and the amount of times i've seen them hit people...yeah. We've also had a few literally blow up on commuter trains to the point where we out right banned them on trains.

There's more to this that I don't think people realize. no they don't kill people but yes they do cause accidents because of the people driving them and feeling like they can ride them on sidewalks or...you know...the batteries will randomly explode.

[–] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 9 points 16 hours ago

Isn't that more of a problem with delivery services though? We don't have e-bikes here. Delivery drivers ride motorcycles. They still ride on sidewalks, filter between everything and run red lights. From what I understand this happens in places that use normal bikes too. Banning e-bikes will only help with the battery issue.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Iowa just tried to pass a bill that would ban all bicycles - not just e-bikes - from any road that has a speed limit over 25 mph (public response was loud and immediate so they scrapped it).

We're going to see more of these.

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Just to help show how stupid of an idea it is (and how little the republicans in charge think about anything) it would have banned ragbrai.

https://ragbrai.com/

RAGBRAI, The Register’s Annual Great Bicycle Ride Across Iowa, is an annual seven-day bicycle ride across the state from July 18-25, 2026. RAGBRAI is the oldest, largest, and longest recreational bicycle touring event in the world.

This rolling celebration of Iowa attracts participants from all 50 states and many foreign countries. It has covered thousands of miles through the years, and hundreds of thousands of riders have hopped in the saddle to pedal part of those miles.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fortunately, the ragbrai issue really helped boost visibility/outage, but yeah. I can't help but wonder if the people who penned this thing knew that going in, or are truly so incompetent they didn't consider it as a consequence.

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 2 points 11 hours ago

They are the same ones surprised no one wants to go to the institute of freedom they forced one of the universities to implement

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If there was an extensive bike network instead of John Forster bullshit vehicular cycling, it would make a lot of sense.

But Iowa doesn’t have bicycle infrastructure.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago

My city alone has over 150 miles of bike trail. Compared to other rural US states (it's an admittedly low bar) our bike infrastructure is actually pretty good, and the statewide biking community is extremely involved and active. It's one of the few things keeping me here.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 6 points 15 hours ago

Given how many lanes Houston’s highways already have I’m starting to wonder if the cars are the ones in charge there.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago

Jealous if the freedom this bike curfew affords them down in Texas

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

This is just another excuse for cops to fine/arrest/oppress people. Utter bullshit.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

Small government eh?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Lett's pretend these aren't the tool of choice of dealers and just get angry at the man.

[–] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

drug dealers are awesome tho