this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
662 points (99.1% liked)

pics

26996 readers
643 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone else verified that the person he is cuddling is, most probably, Melania herself between the age of 17-22 years of age.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ew trump Brett and epstien came in her. If that isn't the recipe for creating Satan idk what is.

[–] clean_anion@programming.dev 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There were many people who experienced Trump, Epstein etc. "cumming in them" through no fault of their own. Please don't compare survivors of sexual abuse to an entity that many associate with evil.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I could believe your virtue signaling as genuine insight but I'm feeling generous today so I'll put point out why you're being intellectually lazy. Melania went from being a passive victim to being an passive participant. She DIRECTLY benefits from said CP. She isn't doing anything other then getting brides through fame and money. Please use more of your brain then an initial reaction.

[–] clean_anion@programming.dev 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I agree Melania can be seen as a passive participant. I never objected to you being critical of her. Instead, my issue was with the reason you gave, which compares survivors of sexual abuse to an embodiment of evil. That comparison is deeply offensive to people who were abused. Calling my response “virtue signaling” misreads me: I genuinely found your message hurtful.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

And you're entitled to how you feel and I am sorry it hurt you. I was being facetious ONLY because it's someone as evil as the rest. Remember "I don't really care, do you".

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump met Melania on the Lolita express. They are all chomo human traffickers. Melania then got a genius visa because her lesbian softcore pornography shoots were so next level.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The genius visa part really makes the whole thing tie a knot on itself and makes it a perfect little bit of concentrated corruption. She almost learned the language, even, almost.

On a wholly unrelated note; https://woodworkingnut.com/2015/10/30/how-to-make-a-guillotine/

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 21 hours ago

Man Im thinking of this guy I knew in high school. I mean he was nice enough but he was wierd with relationships. Like not just women but the way he is holding that girl like. MINE! You would have a phone call with the guy and he would say want to go see X movied on friday and later in the week some other buddies would call and plans would develop like bowling and the arcade. Then he would be like. But we had plans. Like he did not like the whole group going out. He wanted just one person. It was like. Just you and me. Do you think this was a date. I mean I did not say that to him but it was crazy the way it seemed. Its like dude chill out we like doing this and its easier to socialize than a movie. Which is more like what I actually told him. Anyway he was that much worse with girls.

[–] TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I know that guy from the Hannibal Lecter Red Dragon and Rush Hour, he's kind of mid as a director, somehow I am not really surprised by these Hollywood types...

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 122 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And thats Melania with him under that black box

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yup, compare picture of her at that time and she has the same haircut and bracelet. Melenia started as a victim, grew up to become an abuser (idk if she's into kids but that movie was definitely abuse).

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 22 points 2 days ago

Rumor has it that Epstein introduced Melania to Trump, and that the first time they had sex was on the Lolita Express.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I bet this guy fucked Melanie through the campaign trail, and that Trump is literally a cuck. 

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago

Epstein sold Melanie to Trump after she got passed around the whole club.

https://www.tmz.com/2025/09/08/epstein-birthday-book-trump-check-joke/

[–] IAmLamp@fedia.io 22 points 2 days ago

He was too busy blowing bubba to notice

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Trump fucked Melania just enough to have kids.

He's asexual biromantic otherwise

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] me_myself_and_I@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Ironic that she is an immigrant but ICE would never dare to deport her! "Rules for thee and not for me." EDIT: Not that I want them too. Just saying how hypocritical it is. Total double standards.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Keep her out of the Schengen area, please.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

they wont target rich magats.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And his four anchor baby children. Deport them all.

He's also an anchor baby.....

[–] halfsalesman@piefed.social 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

And Rush Hour 1-3 :(

I already feel shitty enough that I liked those movies because of how Jackie Chan turned out to be a homophobic authoritarian. But both this piece of shit director and Chris Tucker are both in the Epstein files. Fuck me.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 23 hours ago

Is no one going to tell us the name of this asshole? You guys might already know it but I can assure you most of us do not know the name of directors to popular movies as such.

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Welp, never been a huge fan of Jackie Chan but still a sad TIL 😿

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 23 hours ago

What did Jackie Chan have to do with it? Mr. Tucker is implicated so far, not Jackie.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

and Chris Tucker are both in the Epstein files

WHAT?!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

First time I see her smile

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like she's trying to pass a stone to me

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, Keith Richards.

[–] NoxAstrum@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That is only the 2nd expression I've ever seen her make. The other is just indifference with a touch of sadness Like the tip of an acupuncture sadness, because psychopaths don't really feel much.

So being the second expression, it must be a smile.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can we get this as his Wikipedia image?

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I was thinking his imdb profile could use a refresh.

Did we get any pictures of him with Weinstein on the island?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Hi. Longtime Wikipedia editor here to be a buzzkilling fogey and say "no" – and not even (just) for the reason you think. AMA about Wikipedia infobox images.

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know sam reich had a lot of trouble to get a better picture uploaded to his page. Why is it so hard to get a good picture uploaded of yourself (even if it is released into public domain/CC)

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I actually can't speak to Reich's experience, as I hadn't heard about this before; the only information I could find on it is this Reddit post which states somebody tried to upload his incompatibly licensed photo from IMDb. The citation in this image is to a members-only Game Changer video.

The steps are straightforward and should go as follows:

  • Make sure the image you're going to use can be licensed under a compatible license – generally CC BY-SA, CC BY, or CC0 (public domain). If somebody else took it, make sure you have their consent to freely license it. Written consent is preferable if you're afraid it could be challenged.
  • Make sure the image is better than the original if one already exists. If you're doing this in good faith, this next part probably shouldn't apply, but: make sure it doesn't violate guidelines on promotion, (superfluous) vulgarity, etc.
  • On Wikimedia Commons, add metadata to the image such as the date taken, the author, etc. then publish it.
    • In the case where you're uploading your own headshot which you intend to use on Wikipedia, the description should probably state that you, the user, are also the subject (especially if the author is someone other than you).
  • Now to get it onto Wikipedia, you'll swap the current infobox image out for the one on Commons by just changing the string in the 'image' parameter of the infobox template.
  • On a technical level you're done, but on a social one, Wikipedia does also require COI disclosures and heavily discourages editing about yourself, so it's a good idea to go to the talk page and clarify that you're the subject, that you changed the image, and why you changed the image (if one existed before).

So to your question: I can't really say, because it doesn't seem like a difficult process, and I don't know how/if Sam Reich's experience deviated from it.


Edit: TIL we have an actual guide for this.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Re: Sam Reich - Sam Reich admitted during (a hilarious lie detector test during) last season super finale of Game Changer that he created a Wikipedia account just to add a better picture of himself. LoL.

Edit: Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Don't call that a movie. It's an insult for real movies.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

And the person he’s squeezing is Melania.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn’t realize it but I think soullessness is actually a spectrum because Epstein looks significantly more depraved somehow

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

Ratner’s hunched shoulders indicate shame, or at least concern about being photographed in bed with a child. Epstein looks totally unbothered, like the sociopath he clearly was.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›