Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
If you think I'm denigrating these heroes, It's the 2nd fools who imagine that the problem was their ideals, their organization, or their commitment that failed. Because it couldn't have been the guns.
there's literally Chinese (or some type, I'm assuming Chinese) characters in the helmet..
Memes often aren’t actually pictures of the thing they represent. That’s why we put labels on them to denote who the characters are.
Yep, this is what happens when authoritarians don't think you have a gun.
Peretti was getting pistol whipped before they saw his gun.
If he had a rifle instead, they wouldn't have escalated to violence because that's a visual deterrent. By the time they knew he was carrying a CCW they'd already escalated past the point they felt they could walk away. It's not a visual deterrent to prevent conflict, it can only be used for deadly force during a conflict.
Which is exactly why open carry was vilified during the black panthers rise to popularity, so that they could disarm the minorities and largely leading to where we are today
the tools of oppression can't destroy oppression
they can only put the lid on it for a little while
Violent aggressors only respond to force. A unified front can be a show of force. Non-Violent protest does not mean peaceful. Sabotage is non-violent. Destruction of the tools of the oppressed is non-violent. Regardless of what the law says, property damage is not a violent act.
Very important concepts!
Imagine how much worse it would be if they didn't have to worry about the citizens having guns to defend themselves with.
Less protection for ourselves isn't going to make the police chill out, I feel like people don't understand that.
I don't think people realize how fantastically destructive the US army could be on a civilian resistance. It would be an absolute slaughter with mid air bursting rounds killing and entire room full of people once they breach a window.
Drone surveillance with no where to run or hide. Complete air superiority. Death would rain down constantly. The weapons of war are truly perverse. Think of the horror of cluster bombs with thousands of bomblets going off at once and hundreds later on for the next ten years randomly killing and maiming people.
To even suggest such horrors is beyond disgusting yet we have a President gleefully suggesting turning the army on his fellow countrymen.
Because the government has more guns. They're not magical amulets that ward off the government.