this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
546 points (99.5% liked)

News

34646 readers
2798 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press, marking a sharp reversal of longstanding guidance meant to respect constitutional limits on government searches.

The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal, a move that advocates say collides with Fourth Amendment protections and upends years of advice given to immigrant communities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

But Hunter Biden's laptop.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 129 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I wonder how well this new policy will jibe with the castle doctrine?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 78 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Surely it will work, right? All those school shootings and accidental murders, they were for this. To stand up to tyranny. Surely Americans won't just roll over/cheer like they always do. Surely not. Lmao

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago

Watching ICE target communities that have intentionally been disarmed as a result of mass shootings: lmao why don’t these dumbasses just shoot someone

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We already know how. It won't.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

When ingroups do it, its castle doctrine. When outgroups do it its terrorism. There is no law in the US. Just an uncivilized savage land now.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago

There is no law in the US. Just an uncivilized savage land now.

🧑‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] bdot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

well - considering the “assassination attempt” on Trump, and how anyone speaking against the regime is a “domestic terrorist,” my money is on the idea that very soon there will be some ICE agents that have an encounter with “ANTIFA thugs,” and this is where martial law will be declared.

Trump is insane right now, and he is big mad that he’s not getting his way in Switzerland; he’s getting bullied right back, and he’s starting to see that people are laughing at him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zib@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The legal side of it would probably be unfairly weighted in ICE's favor, but I suspect if they tried this in a place like Texas, by the time it got to court, those frozen water nazis would already be shot the hell up.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Which is why they're very carefully avoiding Texas, I suspect.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 62 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

And home of the shame.

[–] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

*terms and conditions apply

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was only Land of the Free while it was the Home of the Brave, but no one would stand up for their rights so they lost them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Castle doctrine says otherwise.

[–] PhatalFlaw@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sir, this is ~~a Wendy's~~ Minnesota. There's no castle doctrine, but rather a duty to retreat.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago

I could absolutely be wrong about this because I’ve never really looked it up, but I thought “duty to retreat” still allowed use of lethal force once there is nowhere left to retreat (for example, once in your own home).

Part of those pesky “inalienable rights”.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Look, if I'm on that jury I'm not convicting you if nazis break down your door and you start defending yourself

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand, however in the article it states "The shift comes as the Trump administration dramatically expands immigration arrests nationwide..."

There's a reason this started in areas such as Minnesota. I fully believe this is just trial runs and laying the (il)legal framework to handle more difficult areas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Incorrect. Minnesota has a castle doctrine for defending your home, a duty to retreat in public.

Duty to retreat does not apply when you are already in your own home. It's only when you are in public or outside of the protection of your own home.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I found a memo that says they can’t

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You need the other document

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

(Hey, It's not illegal to quote the nation's founders, right? 👀)

Edit: Btw I remember this was required class material... must be awkward for the highschoolers of current times lol

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Good stuff but the ministry of truth will inevitably rewrite it in accordance with Prager U TM

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

That's on their toilet paper.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If ICE agents were smart they would refuse to do this. Sooner or later someone is going to defend their home against these goons, using lethal force. The government is deliberately putting these morons in harm's way so they can use the death of an agent as political currency; people like Miller care so little about ICE agents that they wish to see them dead.

[–] itistime@infosec.pub 18 points 1 week ago

MAGAmind have their hands clasped in excitement. They want the violence in the streets. We can’t win direct conflict with their goons. We must not give them what they want. We must circumvent their foot soldiers, and seek direct action against their masters. Make it clear to everyone: go after the money

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

That's all the excuse they need to ratchet this up another notch.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How long till they break into a home and find themselves in the midst of a boobytrap. Nice bucket of paint over the door, that sort of thing. Nothing harmful, just a bucket of yellow paint to mark the cowards for what they are. This is clearly criminal behavior, and needs to stop.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Nothing harmful, just a bucket of yellow paint

From the report they'll file: I was attacked by a chemical weapon in the form of a pigmented substance, so I started blastin'

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think I've seen this one

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Wet Bandits were just baby ICE!!!

load more comments (1 replies)

"advocates say..."

Dude, armed masked individuals are breaking into your house and kidnapping you and your family.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sounds like a fine way to end up eating a buckshot sandwich, but I'm not one to interrupt my enemy while they're making a mistake.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Buckshot in one barrel, slugs in the other. Some of these stupid assholes might be wearing plates that didn't come from Temu.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They know who has guns. They're going after people who don't.

Love to be proven wrong, though.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Contrary to what many people may believe, while I'm sure the government has an idea of who has guns and who doesn't, I doubt that idea accurately reflects reality. There are lots of ways in the US to get or make a gun that don't involve anything beyond cash changing hands.

It's only a matter of time.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just a reminder that "the government" now includes Palantir's dystopian surveillance suite. You can be sure that every target has a confidence rating assigned to it as to what kind of resistance can be expected. The small percentage of people that maintain a low enough profile to be able to be armed without having any sort of red flag attached are likely to be assigned a low confidence rating. Yes, there will always be a chance that there's a mismatch. But the goons on the ground are being sent after the lowest hanging fruit. They may be mouth breathing meatsacks, but the ones calling the shots are not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People are already asking how long it will take for an ICE gestapo to get shot

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago

That's part of the goal.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm shocked everyday that it still isn't happening

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They picked their cities very carefully.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

They were in Chicago.

[–] shani66@ani.social 18 points 1 week ago

People have killed cops and got off free of charge to protect their rights. Cops. Real agents of a legitimate state.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Well I have a memo deauthorizing it, it's just as legally enforceable as theirs.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trump previously: "Take the guns first, go through due process second." (actual quote)

Trump today: "Take the homes first, go through due process second."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago

They can assert it all they want, it won't stop them from being shot.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Next they'll be breaking into churches and schools, watch for it. Churches used to be considered off-limits, but I'm betting they are only off-limits in the bible belt, not the rest of the country.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›