this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
1043 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

10357 readers
1959 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Waaaaay more attractive than whatever the fuck maga women are doing to themselves.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The girl in the OP post arguably overdid things a little, but it's her body, her choice

This right wing one just fell of a cliff straight into the abyss of uncanny valley nightmares. What the fuck is that even, it's not human

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adb@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago

MAGA men and women are unattractive whatever their looks.

[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The original before and after is bad enough, but this is a photoshopped one with extra inflated cheeks.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I call it “going under the saw” instead of “going under the knife” because they look like Jigsaw.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I like the already perfect term Mar a Lago Face. Everyone knows exactly what that is without anyone having to explain it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

We get it. MAGA likes them UP to 18yrs... then "eww"

[–] Janx@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

I hate this so much. This is objectification dialed up to 11. This young woman has value, but only her appearance and only if she dresses and acts how most conservatives want. 🤮 And they all get a say in how she presents herself!

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

"Loving" as in "if you so much as think about self-determination, you'll get guilt-tripped, emotionally manipulated and berated for defying God's plan"? Because those conditions tend to produce the type of person that doesn't act up as a teen, but once they reach adulthood and taste freedom, they go all out, with mixed results. Tats and piercings certainly aren't the worst outcome.

It's a very effective strategy, because speaking as a queer woman, I would see the person on the right and think "personal experience tells me this person might belong to the alphabet mafia, so perhaps I could buy her a drink"

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ITT: People missing the point and evaluating the relative attractiveness of the two images versus acknowledging the objectification and subjugation of women as a problem.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Oh come on, be honest.

We all objectify all day and as long as you do it in your head and know how to act and react normal, it's fine. Whatever anyone does in their head is fine as long as it stays there.

Anytime I hear someone say that they would never objectify anyone I feel this huge "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" kind of thing. We've all looked at someone else and thought "habbah habbah.

Just, again, keep it to yourself.

Some people like the girl without the tattoos on the left, others like the girl with the tattoos in the right. So? Just let her decide for herself and find someone else if you don't like it

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

ITT: People not keeping it to themselves.

Agreed, thinking is not a crime. Replying to a mysogenist's rant with, "Well he's not wrong" is objectively mysogeny. Which is also not a crime, but we can do better.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is feeling sexual attraction the same as objectifying?

[–] yoissy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Not really. Sexual attraction is merely something you feel. Objectification is when you let that dominate your view of someone. When you reduce them to nothing but a sexual object. You can feel sexual attraction without it being primary factor in how you see someone.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

when your whole public assessment of others is explaining your ability to be sexually attracted to them, then yes. really gotta notice your publicly talking about someone for a lot of them to happen.

[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe she'd be more appealing to that dipshit chud if she got the conservative woman ghoul creature plastic surgery package.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 247 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I bet what suddenly made her so unappealing to this guy was turning 18.

[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 72 points 4 days ago

They hate consenting adults.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dunno... Tattoos and piercings are kinda hot...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 3 days ago (8 children)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bro... I just opened Lemmy. At least let me wake up first...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jve@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Would hit it.

And by “it” I mean “that guy’s face.”

[–] rollin@piefed.social 156 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Saying "After 2 years with college professors" seems creepy to me, like he thinks college professors are supposed to take over the parents' role.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its more like:

After 2 years of no longer being completely within the social circle of and under the financial and physical control of Christian Nationalists / Super Fundies.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 69 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This person you see but have minimal interaction with a few times a week for 13 weeks really screams parental figure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They think education is flawed. It's part of the GOP indoctrination. What you're saying is morbidly comical, but the real reason is how the Right regard education.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am pretty sure this is a porn star on the right but I can't remember the name.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 119 points 4 days ago

In guessing this guy isn't super into adult women.

[–] FranciscoLopez@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah, not everything is meant to be evaluated through personal attraction. People grow for themselves, not an audience.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 105 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Weird women with tats are very appealing to me. I married one.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago (10 children)

She's gorgeous.

Is that many tattoos to my taste? Not totally. But its not her job to be to my taste, or his taste, or anyone's taste. That doesn't make her not gorgeous.

I hate conservative men. Like WTF.

load more comments (10 replies)

Ain't no hate like Christian "love"

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 85 points 4 days ago

Conservatives chose to spread Mar a lago face. I do not respect their sense of aesthetics.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 2 days ago

Look at the eyes, the one at the right looks more confident. Good for them.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Got called a "soyboy" by some right wing women, told them "good, I don't want to appeal to women who want to be regularly beaten by tgeir husbands".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 64 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The person everyone forces you to be vs the person you are for yourself.

"Should we ban self-expression, or just limit it away from women?"

Okay buddy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Obligatory Kirsten ~~Dunst~~ BELL reference

https://youtu.be/dKSwIuom5c8

Edit: Dont know how I could do that mistake

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Conservatives want all women to look fuckable cause that’s all women are to them

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If "Mar-a-Lago face" is any indicator, they also want them to look interchangeable and non-human.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prinx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Americans love freedom until someone freely chooses to be comfortable in the way they look!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I wish I could get people to care about anything that really matters (wages, health care, peace, etc) as they do about other people's appearances.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 30 points 3 days ago

yes. the most sexually unnattractive demographic of all. checks notes porn stars

load more comments
view more: next ›