this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
617 points (98.4% liked)

politics

27206 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has said that the United States shouldn’t have midterm elections this year because midterm voters often vote against the president’s party. Democratic congressional leaders have said they expect Trump to disrupt and dispute the midterms.

“It’s some deep psychological thing, but when you win the presidency, you don’t win the midterms,” Trump told Reuters in a recent interview. He then boasted that his presidency had accomplished so much that “when you think about it, we shouldn’t even have an election.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told the Associated Press that Democrats are concerned that Trump will try to prevent open and fair midterm elections.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Gosh, if only we'd known what he was like before all this happened.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Jeez. Forget going mask-off. This asshole just did the equivalent of walking in the room naked.

[–] Kaz@lemmy.org 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's like that airplane interview when Lindsay Graham is like "we gotta help the people of venuezala", then Trump goes straight back to rambling about oil when Lindsay is trying to smooth trumps deranged babbling over.

He's a terrible liar, has no idea how to cover things properly.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

No one’s ever held him accountable, why should he get better if it’s been working the whole time?

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Democrats are concerned. Ahh yes, just concerned. The silence from Dems has been disgusting

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, Democrat leadership is furiously working on how they could support the fascists.

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago

But but but they'll ban insider trading for members if Congress any day now....they promised!

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

He already said before that if the Republicans lose the mid terms, and they would, they will, he would be jailed

He's right

And he will be.

They'd need a two thirds majority in the senate to convict him after impeachment.

No chance. Repub seats are gerrymandered to shit, and while he's unpopular he's still more popular than dems in quite a lot of those seats

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Much as I'd love for that to happen, assuming there are free and fair elections at all: I have a feeling the first words out of the Democratic leadership after winning will be "it's time for healing and to move forward" (or words to that effect)

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Chuck Schummer had already basically bent over for them multiple times.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 12 points 2 days ago

All of this is one big convoluted effort to stay out of jail while inflicting as much fear and pain as possible.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Some people escaped dictatorships... only to end up here... 🫠

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So many colored people voted for this orange turd, it's fucking maddening.

Same, for every woman that voted for this child rapist deserves their heads examined.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

People vote for a well known rapist and then are surprised when their country gets fucked.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 156 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yesterday he joked about it. Today he says it. Tomorrow he does it.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 73 points 3 days ago

He wasn't joking.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm sure trump is going to call for the mid-terms elections to be cancelled. We'll still have them, but it will give cover for gerrymandered red-states to reduce their efforts to make voting available and visible to their citizen.

If the elections go south for Republicans, I fully expect Mike Johnson to play games with allowing Democrats to be sworn in and seated in Congress. We really need to be preparing for both of these scenarios.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He will declare that Dems cheated everywhere they win, and if the House tries anything, he will declare they are traitors and declare state of emergency claiming absolute power (or whatever other made up shit).

Time to count who sides with whom in the military…

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 6 points 2 days ago

The military has already taken Trump's side, and are gladly following his illegal orders to murder Venezuelan fishermen and kidnap their president.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I vote we throw Shitler, the turd Reich and every politician who takes money from Israel into a woodchipper and start over

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 102 points 3 days ago (9 children)

So the reason he's come up with is literally just he thinks he'll lose?

That's a very good reason for there to be an election, Donny

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 days ago (5 children)

"Democracy" is too close to "Democrat" in his pee brain and kinda short-circuits.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 90 points 3 days ago (27 children)

The US shouldn't have a convicted felon in the oval, but here we are.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

US shouldn't have a president

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Let AIPAC control America directly instead of via a puppet president and Congress.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 85 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I dunno, Biden performed better than expected and he's a sleepy old guy. Is trump saying he's no better than a sleepy old guy?

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 days ago

I mean he sleeps all the time and also on camera.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 60 points 3 days ago

I really don't give a fuck what this asshole wants.

His very existence in that office is illegal and immoral.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 32 points 3 days ago (30 children)

Hey “we just gotta vote harder” Americans, what you gonna do when they take voting away?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I am probably part of the 0.001% of people who actually had interest in and read exit polling from 2024, because it contains data that makes a lot of people very uncomfortable, particularly on the left who have blamed repeated losses on voter turnout.

The problem is not turnout, the problem in American democracy is the subversion of the broadest swath of people, the tuned-out, overworked, misinformed liberal majority in America.

The last several federal elections have had the highest voter turnout in American history.

What they didn't have though was people who had any involvement in the issues or understanding how the political system works, and apparently no attention spans at all. Many millions of the people who voted for Trump were people who voted for Obama or supported Bernie Sanders, and that should spark a massive conversation about leftist/democrat messaging, but is largely glossed over. And a massive swath of the voting was literally hinged on the price of eggs at the time, and the well-known effect of voters making their decisions based on current economics and the party currently in power.

A lot of this came from forces foreign and domestic doing everything they can to salt the discourse, poison all the wells and boost all the weirdest, worst nonsense on both sides so that average people who only get their news and information from two hours of facebook or twitter scrolling every week had no idea what was going on.

So yes, "just vote harder" didn't and won't work going forward. Our chance at turning this around though is that people right now are a LOT more unhappy with our politics than they were in 2024, everyone in 2024 were far more comfortable and didn't actually believe the stories about Trump being a fascist dictator, and tuned out his previous administration because attention spans broadly are melted. Right now if elections were held, or canceled, Trump will get wiped out one way or another.

The GOP's only hope of retaining power is literally a fascist takeover, they know it, they're just too dumb broadly to pull it off so I have a good feeling midterms are going to be a violent spank in the ass, and Trump will likely not finish his term. This country has actually survived many similar periods. If enough people can get their brains disengaged from the slop then we have a chance.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Krasnov can go fuck himself. Where are the damn Epstein Files?

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump says a lot of stupid shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arc99@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Wow it's almost as though midterms represent some kind of check and balance. Trump and the republicans stand a good chance of being wiped out.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Dickless tater.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

When you think about it, your mother shoulda swallowed.

💦Edit: Trump's mother. Not OP's. I had a similar misunderstanding recently.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Do it Trump ... that would make Trump an active threat to the Consitution.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

He already is an active threat to the constitution

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

He has been for 5 years I don't think he's going to stop and nobody seems to be wanting to actually stop them One guy came close by 2 cm if you want to believe it wasn't staged

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Shouldn’t have a felonious, rapist, racist, seditious, stochastic terrorist pedophile as president either, but here we are.

[–] muxika@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Well, he said you'd only need to vote the one time.

load more comments
view more: next ›