this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
65 points (97.1% liked)

News

34172 readers
3200 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill and Hillary Clinton refused on Tuesday to testify in the House’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, escalating a monthslong battle with its Republican leader, Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, who quickly said he would take steps to hold them in contempt of Congress.

archive: https://archive.ph/TxjCV

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Janx@piefed.social 19 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago) (1 children)

Closed-door testimony? For this administration, that is already breaking the law by withholding, redacting, and editing the Epstein files it was legally supposed to release last month?? EDIT: Oh, and lying about literally everything.

Fuck that. Everything needs to be done in the open...

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 4 hours ago

Right? I can't fault Hilary for not showing up to a majority Republican Congress inquiry after how they treated her over the Benghazi thing, plus Trump calling for her assassination.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 25 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I'm conflicted. I want them to face justice, but at the same time even though I know I'm not in one single Epstein file, I would be hesitant to testify anything to this administration or their cronies.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I initially felt that way. Then I read that others were allowed to provide a written testimony and they were asking to do the same. Were they ordered to appear in person so Fox could show the video of them over and over? Probably.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 7 hours ago

That's the gist of my hesitation, it's impossible not to view this as politically motivated - despite how clumsy a political move it is.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah fuck the Clintons. Fuck them for this Epstein shit, but fuck them for all the legal/"legitimate" things they've done too. Infinite negative sympathy for monsters.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Not my tempo, though I do share the sentiment. I don't think their 'dynasty' still has legs though, so I'm trying to figure out how they matter, except as a politically convenient punching bag. Someone wants you mad at Dems right now, is how I read this one.

There's going to be no justice at all for those in power until after a successful midterm rout. If the greyfaced old pedos (GOP) hold onto Congress, the won't be a 2028.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There's going to be no justice at all for those in power until after a successful midterm rout.

Don't hold your breath waiting for the Democrats to dole out justice. I guarantee if they win they'll do the whole, "let's put the past behind us and work together moving forward," bullshit. There might be a few performative wrist slaps, but justice isn't going to come from the party.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago

I think it's pretty clear I'm talking about two possible outcomes in neither of which a great result is guaranteed, however one of them promises a clearly far worse outcome.

It's getting annoying to have to clarify this in 2026. Could we read some rooms once in a while?

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Someone wants you mad at Dems right now, is how I read this one.

I mean I'm cool with that forever tbh. The Dems gave the keys of the kingdom to the orange fascist, and they are more than complicit in creating the conditions for a fascist takeover.

There's going to be no justice at all for those in power until after a successful midterm rout.

There wasn't justice on Epstein the last time the Dems were in power so I don't see why we should trust them a second time 🤷‍♂️

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You're being a little one-note, right now. I get the anger and I don't think we disagree on much, but I'd rather not point that anger at each other.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah I'm not mad at you, I'm mad at them. Sorry if I came off that way. I'm trying to be constructive but also take a firm stance against the Epstein class, you know?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 13 hours ago

That's creditable. We all hate the situation we're in, and I see so few ways for things to improve. I have to spare a thought for the people more vulnerable than me whose lives are on the line, while knowing that I'm tied to a chair and asking for the good cop to come back; as soon as we get the chance, we'd best be rid of them both.

[–] matthewm05@ttrpg.network 8 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Americans voted for Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.

They really are a stupid bunch.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 4 hours ago

As stupid as confidently being wrong about people having the option to vote for Sanders as president?

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 14 points 8 hours ago

Except not really. Bernie had larger support, but the DNC pulled him off the ticket in favor of Hillary, against the wishes of most democrat voters.

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago

Registered Democrats in like 6 states chose Hillary over Bernie by a slim margin in the middle of 2016 during the Primaries that year. The vast majority of Americans have not had the opportunity to vote for Bernie outside of Democrat Primaries and most of those votes happened after choices have been made at the party level.