this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
1388 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

78705 readers
3220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Victoriathecompact@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago

It was being OVERRUN with AI stuff, hopefully this cleans it up

[–] evol@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

lol I can imagine decades ago people cheering for songs that use sampling to no longer being allowed on a site. We really never learn sigh.

[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That really was a thing. There was a backlash towards sampling for like a decade and nowadays, no one seems to even notice or care. Same with synthesizer based music…so many people argued that it was not music and not real and that it was going to ruin music.

[–] evol@lemmy.today 0 points 8 hours ago

It genuinely astonishes me how regressive people turn about AI in art, its like I'm talking to Bill O Reilly complaining about modern art.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

I was buying some LPs recently and saw one that caught my attention. I looked them up and almost all their content included some form of AI.

it's bullshit.

fuck AI.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Bandcamp consistently throws Ws

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 13 hours ago

Surprising considers that it's parent company Epic (yes, of ~~Fortnite~~ Unreal Tournament and GoW fame) has a pro-AI stance.

[–] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

but ai is company and company is people in america 🥴

[–] AntEater@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 23 hours ago

YES! YES!! YES!!! I hate having to sift through that tripe when exploring certain genres.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I'm generally supportive of removing AI from artistic endeavors, but also wildly unfamiliar with bandcamp. I'm looking at it for the first time right now. Does it work like Deezer / Tidal or one of the streaming services where I can listen to things from my phone, or is it more of a website that you use to discover unsigned / smaller acts by clicking through a bunch of things and listening?

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

An important feature is that you can basically download (and thus, own) the music you pay for (in many formats too).

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Bit of both. More on the indi/hobby side of things though.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 7 points 16 hours ago

Major labels have a presence on there too though.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Bandcamp W. One of the platforms I buy music from and surf other than soundcloud. You can find some banger albums by genre on there.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I hope all my fave autistic musicians are not mistaken for AI and deleted under a false-positive detection of being AI. At least my fave's album releases all pre-date AI music generators. Safe, for now.

I think safer would be to encourage all purely AI-generated be tagged as such, so it can be optionally toggled out of view, and then there's less incentive for the unscrupulous to simply hide that it's AI generated. Banning increases the "hide that it's AI" vibes, not the "don't do AI" vibes. Prohibition does not prevent. Prohibition makes the good things bad and the bad things worse.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 15 points 16 hours ago

Prohibition of AI does indeed prevent Bandcamp's servers from being overwhelmed by the storage needs of slop "artists" and the gruel they call their "music".

I've been re-reading LOTR lately and I like to put on Middle-Earth ambience in the background. Do you have any idea how much LOTR themed ambient slop is on YouTube? There are channels with over 100 videos, each exactly a 3-hour slopfest of sounds with HD/4k resolution slop art playing on screen.

Considering the vast majority of real artists might put out 5 hours of music in their entire careers, why the hell would bandcamp want to host hundreds of hours of fake music from a single source and pay for all that storage?

AI is a plague upon humanity. Bandcamp is on the right side of history and I'm happy to have my music on their platform.

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I doubt they would just blanket scan all music and ban that which they think is AI (aside from how that's practically impossible). That's the kind of thing a lazy big tech company would do. I wouldn't be surprised if this will just end up being on a report basis, at the very least with human verification once steps like banning would be taken. Because otherwise it would be pretty disastrous for the reasons you mentioned, since it would ban legitimate artists. Not to mention the bar of "substantially AI" would need to be judged by someone.

[–] Zarajevo@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago

Great decision Bandcamp, I use Bandcamp to support musicians

[–] Cloudstash@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Paying monthly subscriptions for music that for most people is essentially the same mix with some deviations will become very costly for listeners over time. Relying on paid streaming services is the ultimate expression of laziness.

[–] pirating@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How would you even screen for AI music?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

With AI, duh

[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 154 points 1 day ago

I'm glad they did this. Confident in my choice to remain with Bandcamp.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 81 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Keep it up bandcamp. We are all waiting for when you enshittify like everyone else but you've held it at bay so far.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 day ago

They gave us a scare over the years, being sold around to companies that are famous for enshittifying platforms.

Epic sold the company when people unionized, and the next did a trick to not recognized the union and "hire" half of the staff (contrary to fire half of them).

The platform is not what has been 5 years ago, but it is still my favourite place to get music around.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Neat, my current setup is :

  • stream from FIP.fr via cvlc
  • when I absolutely love a tune, buy on Bandcamp
  • if it's not available or I bought it elsewhere, e.g. old CD, then get from Soulseek
  • scp my ~/Music directory on my mobile phone

I tried LMS for few weeks but honestly just plain VLC is enough for me.

Anyway, point is, this decision makes me want to buy from Bandcamp even more.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

First I've heard of FIP, I'll have to give it a go

[–] udon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Are Bandcamp still the good guys? I thought they were bought by the big capital and now went down the drain. Artists' opinions especially welcome

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

People expected them to get fucked after the acquisition, though the new owners are just going "you keep doing what you're doing, not gonna change a thing, just give us a cut of your profits"

Touch wood, it's gonna stay that way.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 21 hours ago

I don't bought a lot of music, but all the independent musicians I follow have a bandcamp store. They also sell merch there.

[–] Techlos@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago

on average, i'm earning 3x as much from bandcamp FLAC sales compared to what i earn off streaming. Hasn't been ruined so far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Just watch, we’re two weeks away from some tech bro trying to start a Clankercamp website. The best part is that no one except other tech bros will care.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I need to get back into Bandcamp

load more comments (1 replies)

good decision, also good decision to not ban all music with ai in it. like, we got so many pedals nowadays. live pitch correction? like wtf. how is that not ai. as long as there is some human pouring their blood, sweat, tears and soul into the music, that is what i want to hear.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

As they should.

On the other hand, if AI music was any good why would I go to bandcamp for it?

load more comments
view more: next ›