this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
208 points (96.8% liked)

World News

51984 readers
2218 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI tool faces growing global scrutiny over the spread of nonconsensual sexual images of women and minors on X

Elon Musk said on Wednesday he was not aware of any “naked underage images” generated by xAI’s Grok, as scrutiny of the AI tool intensifies worldwide.

“I not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero,” Musk said in an X post. Musk’s comment comes as xAI and X face growing global scrutiny, including calls by lawmakers and advocacy groups for Apple and Google to drop Grok from app stores, an investigation by UK regulators, and bans or legal action in countries such as Malaysia and Indonesia.

Last week, X curtailed Grok’s ability to generate or edit images publicly for many users, however industry experts and watchdogs have said that Grok was still able to produce sexually explicit images, and that restrictions, such as paywalling certain features, may not fully block access to deeper AI image tools.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 8 points 1 day ago

Translation: Musk was unaware that the devs released his personal version of Grok publicly

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t buy it and here’s why.

Is he getting updates about his company from Yes men? Absolutely. I believe all of the executives at his companies inflate his ego because he’s the “Elon Musk”. But if you read any news and see Twitter mentioned, it’s been about this topic since they started this feature of his misinformation machine.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

I don’t buy it and here’s why.

He's the biggest lier out there, he only doesn't lie when he's promoting nazi shit.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Didn't he literally laugh about it

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

That was the Ketamine talking not him obviously.

[–] cobwoms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

reminds me of the time trump acted like he didn't know what project 2025 was

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I know people who fell for that hook, line and sinker and somehow have blanked that from their memory.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the ol' "i did not have sexual relations" excuse.

“I not [sic] aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero,”

The accusation is about scantily-clad, underclothed image generation of real minors, not full on nudity, which is still CSAM in most laws' eyes, something he conveniently skirts.

It's more than I didn't have sexual relations. It's I don't know where I don't remember. The get out of jail free card for politicians in rich people alike.

Look at how often Mike Johnson just says he doesn't know what's going on.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

it's because of his definition of underage, isn't it

[–] antonymous_bosch69@feddit.org 31 points 2 days ago
[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Grok was still able to produce sexually explicit images, and that restrictions, such as paywalling certain features, may not fully block access [...]

Charging money for revenge porn didn't work as a "restriction"? Demanding people paying to access CSAM didn't "fully block" it?

Whoever at Reuters allowed that sentence to form is just cooked.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Bullshit. And, everyone, literally everyone, knows it. But, nothing will happen.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

The Führer is unaware of any concentration camps and associated atrocities.

[–] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So your giant expensive water poisoning machine that you own and built is generating content you’re not aware of, and this is a commercial product you’re charging for and integrating into the Pentagon?

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

And your point being….?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“Obviously, Grok does not spontaneously generate images, it does so only according to user requests,” Musk said.

“Guns don’t kill. People do.”

[–] kholby@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

To you and most normal people, that sounds like, "GuNs DoN't KiLl. PeOplE dO 🤪," but to a lot of Grok users it sounds like an actual argument.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago
[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

When it became news you could AI CSAM, I'm pretty sure his response was... to post an AI picture of himself in a bikini?

I would love to meet the single person who he has convinced by this

[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

My mom's been dead now for over 10 years and she's heard of it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

hes totally aware, if he's been praticing "kung fu" lessons with miss ghislaines maxwell on Epsteins properties before.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

1000021185

Sure thing bud.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

He jerks off to it regularly.

[–] jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 2 days ago

"I do not recall" Okay, well, you have brain chips, we can scan you with those, right?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the value proposition of grok has always been that it will do things that the other models will try to block people from doing

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder if we can get grok to delete itself.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

When in doubt, plead ignorance.