this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
490 points (92.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

10109 readers
2473 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of replies here (obviously from people not already aware of The Discourse on this point) were genuinely confused variants on "But why, they're right, that's a valid concern." Let me leave a short thread for future readers explaining why that stuff is always unwelcome on here. (1/n)

It's totally understandable if you're dooming about any facet of the American experiment right now. So your feelings are "valid" in the sense that they represent real anxiety, and I get that. But to vent that anxiety in other people's spaces is wrong for three reasons.

First, it's factually wrong. There will be elections in 2026 and 2028 under Trump, just like there were elections last year under Trump and during his first term. This despite one of the two major parties now harboring a lot of anti-democratic elements and ideas.

I'm not particularly interested in convincing anyone on this point and won't try, the future is the future. But if the left side of the political spectrum is still the domain of scholarship and expertise, take note that you don't find scholars and experts you worrying about canceled US elections.

Second, and probably most importantly, it's tactically wrong. "No point discussing political opposition to fascism, there won't be elections anyway" cedes victory to your enemies. It's defeatism and nihilism.

Finally, it's wrong AS A MATTER OF ETIQUETTE. Entering a total stranger's discussion and leading with your private anxiety is as off-putting in social media replies as it would be in real life. If you wouldn't interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don't do it here.

If you are anxious and sad about the state of the world, that's fine, and there are plenty of strategies for dealing with that. But I think you already know that drive-by online dooming isn't a strategy. It's selfish and adolescent. It's a contagion that only spreads the worst of you, not the best.

Take a second and think before posting the easy Eeyore reply. You might have something substantive to say instead. Or, even better, you can say nothing at all.

https://bsky.app/profile/kenjennings.bsky.social/post/3mbuedepurs2x

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He lost me at "but to vent that anxiety in other people's spaces...".

It's not "your space", it's a public forum.

Don't want people commenting on your opinion? Don't air it in public, or just block and move on.

No need to write a book about how they're wrong to express their opinion in the same way you just did. It just comes off as sanctimonious.

Fell free to point out my own hypocrisy and we can go in circles.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not "your space", it's a public forum.

I'd argue there's a spectrum from a totally public forum to a totally private forum, and replies to social media posts on platforms where users are followed are somewhere in the middle.

It's kinda like comments on a blog post. The blog owner still controls the space, including the power to block users and delete their comments from that page, and enjoys a privileged position with respect to what is essentially publishing and moderation powers in that particular space.

It's within that particular accountholder's powers to block, ignore, or mute other commenters' ability to interact with the content posted (including simply turning off replies for certain users or all users). So in that sense, the platform itself is public while that particular user's profile page and the feed of that user's posts is curated by that user.

And perhaps most importantly, these commenters are leveraging Ken Jennings' account popularity to magnify their own comments' visibility. They could post something on their own, but they also know that their replies to Ken Jennings have a much higher reach than their own original posts would.

In other words, there's a fundamental difference between capturing a screenshot and posting a reply somewhere else, versus replying on platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

What a fucking waste. You will all deny the reality of the situation until the last second and go, "who could have known?"

Dont be a pussy and block the people who are issuing you a warning. Realize this is the world you are living in right now and stand up.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

"Trump said multiple times he wants to cancel elections. We know he's literally incapable of joking and has no respect for the constitution, so we have no reason to think he's not serious"

"Just a distraction from the Epstein files! Vote in 2028!"

I have kinda given up hope Americans know what "tyrannical government" means, let alone fighting against it

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Second, and probably most importantly, it’s tactically wrong. “No point discussing political opposition to fascism, there won’t be elections anyway” cedes victory to your enemies. It’s defeatism and nihilism.

That's not what people are saying when they say that. They're saying we need to start fighting harder NOW. If we wait until midterm elections do or don't happen we are fucked. There's no guarantee the outcome will be favorable anyway and Trump has already alluded to fucking with elections.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"There's not going to be an election in 2026" is defeatism. The message to fight for it is, "We need to make sure there's still an election in 2026".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I've been saying that all along. These people who say we can't run on punishing Trump, we have to have something to vote FOR, need to understand that until we crush MAGA, and purge it from our government and society, we can NEVER move forward. MAGA is a SERIOUS National Security Threat, and if they aren't dealt with decisively, they'll keep destroying any good in this country, until they are.

I've got a list of improvements America can make, including Medicare 4 All and Campaign Finance Reform, but right now, crushing MAGA is absolute top priority. The time for diplomacy is far past. We need Warriors to be candidates, not appeasers. It's time for LEGAL retribution for their CRIMES, not their politics.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’ve been saying that all along. These people who say we can’t run on punishing Trump, we have to have something to vote FOR, need to understand that until we crush MAGA, and purge it from our government and society, we can NEVER move forward. MAGA is a SERIOUS National Security Threat, and if they aren’t dealt with decisively, they’ll keep destroying any good in this country, until they are.

Democrats ran on that once already but were unwilling to actually do it. They have no credibility now.

I’ve got a list of improvements America can make, including Medicare 4 All and Campaign Finance Reform, but right now, crushing MAGA is absolute top priority

Centrist democrats won't crush MAGA. They're ALLIES. Schumer and Jeffries just fucking proved it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

Oh, yeah, if the Dems can get the majority in the House, the first rule of business needs to be to fire the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries. We need to meet toughness with toughness, and we need leaders who are willing to do that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hesh@quokk.au 92 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (13 children)

I do believe there will probably be elections (and that they'll do everything they can to make them unfair).

But to think there's a 0% chance Trump could move to cancel elections is naive at this point. Add it to the mile-long list of things "he'll never be able to do" that he has done. He's literally already threatened to do it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 73 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's not about "there's no point discussing opposition because there won't be an election anyway," it's about "don't wait until 2028 to act and hope on voting your way out of fascism."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Ethical dilemma" of blocking or muting, what a weenie.

Try not caring enough about their opinion to do either, toughen up buttercup

I don't see how it's rude to comment on a public discussion, but yeah I guess if you want to feel like a martyr on social media go right ahead with that.

"Oh my word, another stranger commenting on my commenting about someone else commenting. I have the vapors!"

Take your own advice and say nothing at all. See? No comments about your no comment. Peace will descend upon you, gentle soul.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wow that's a lot of projection from someone terrified that erudite and well reasoned civility politics might not actually be a good assumption to just carry forward.

But if the left side of the political spectrum is still the domain of scholarship and expertise, take note that you don't find scholars and experts you worrying about canceled US elections.

Oh, really Ken?

Its that simple huh?

https://theweek.com/politics/america-competitive-authoritarianism-trump

Yeah try maybe actually catching up with the experts on how fucked the situation actually is.

Yeah yeah there are likely to technically be elections, but they're likely to not really be legitimate or actually serve truly democratic (small d) purposes.

This is a cope turned into a scold about Ken's little fantasy hugbox reality not being respected by actual reality.

Grow the fuck up.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Hugbox is the right term. The line about invading someone's personal discussion, that you posted yourself in the fucking internet, reeks of so much entitlement. This wasn't a good take by Ken at all. Very out of touch.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"Entering a total strangers discussion" - They posted it on a publicly accessible forum, my dude.

Also, you are probably right the US will have elections, but will they be fair? Will they be free of federal tampering? Will ICE be posted at polling booths and arrest anyone brown who tries to vote? A rigged election is not a legitimate election

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Will ICE be posted at polling booths and arrest anyone brown who tries to vote? A rigged election is not a legitimate election

Will voters stay home for fear of that because of what ICE is doing now, even if ICE doesn't actually interfere on election day?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

The chilling effect of ICE, dang.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 4 days ago (6 children)

If you wouldn’t interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don’t do it here.

Apparently the microblogging format has made people so socially dysfunctional that they've forgotten what a conversation is.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 52 points 4 days ago

The entitlement is bizarre. It's the whole fucking point of a forum. "They're invading my space" is a rich god damned thing to say online.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 68 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think we should at least be prepared for him to try to suspend elections this year and in 2028 (if he’s still alive). Now that the violence is ramping up and they’re threatening military action against the entire Western Hemisphere, the only way they stay out of prison is by staying in power through force.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

Absolutely - it doesn’t take a genius to see the through line from their recent actions to suspending elections. Not to say it definitely will, but that it is a definite possibility

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Entering a total strangers discussion

Yeah, you lost me here. You posted it ON THE FUCKING INTERNET FOR EVERYONE TO SEE. Heaven forbid someone comment and interact. Oh no! Woe is you!

What a load of entitled bullshit.

Suck an egg.

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is gonna age like milk lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But if the left side of the political spectrum is still the domain of scholarship and expertise, take note that you don’t find scholars and experts you worrying about canceled US elections.

Sure Ken, that's because all the scholars and experts on fascism have already fled the country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

If you actually think the current American regime is ever gonna get prosecuted then I have a bridge to sell you.
"Just vote out Hitler next election"
Good luck with that, we will see how that goes for you. I am preparing my thoughts and prayers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 4 days ago

If you wouldn’t interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don’t do it here.

I would totally tell that to a stranger at a party, if he talks about the next election. You are technically correct though. There will be "elections" just not free, equal, democratic ones.

Let me ask one question: Do you expect there to be ICE officers at voting locations?
that answer alone constitutes the difference between free elections and a something you would expect in russia.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 36 points 4 days ago (27 children)

Gotta disagree with Ken on this one. First, as other have pointed out, there is a very real possibility that Trump may find a way to cancel the elections. Laws do not matter to him or his base, and to ignore this fact is leaning too far toward "optimism" that you land in "gullible" territory.

Second, Ken is not the Arbiter of Conversation. I mean, have you seen him make small talk on Jeopardy? For crying out loud, the guy is one of the worst conversationalists on TV today. He's a fucking genius, but not somebody I'd like to spend more than 2 minutes with at the bar. People can input whatever they want, especially when you are having an open conversation. As he mentioned, their thoughts and anxieties are valid, so fucking stop trying to invalidate them.

If you don't want to see doomerism in your feed, I totally get that. I'm tired of it, too (even though I regularly contribute to it). You can totally just block or mute people if you don't want to see that, but to suggest that they shouldn't be saying it to begin with is crossing a line, IMO.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you are anxious and sad about the state of the world, that's fine, and there are plenty of strategies for dealing with that. But think you already know that drive-by online dooming isn't a strategy. It's selfish and adolescent. It's a contagion that only spreads the worst of you, not the best.

This is the juice for me. Worried about the next election? Me too! What are you going to do about it? Dooming in the comments isn't action, and if you're trying to get me to act, then insisting that there's no point in any of this is a weird way to do it.

If you believe that and don't think there are any action steps, fine. But don't slather that despair everywhere. We don't need it; we've already got enough despair. Some of us are trying to do something about it.

Have a plan, try to get people on board with it. But just insisting that everything is doomed is just as useless an online activity as insisting that everything is great.

If you think you've already lost you're guaranteed to lose. Hope is NECESSARY to make a successful attempt.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I agree with Ken, but disagree with his reasons (in particular I think hiis first point is wrong) Here's mine:

  • Doomerism like this is a self fulfilling prophecy, you are giving them permission to do the thing and discouraging the many people fighting to try and make the next election happen properly.
  • Most autocratic nations have elections, they just aren't fair or free. American elections have never been completely fair, but have also been declining rapidly. The original statement thus promotes a dangerous false dichotomy ("see nothing to worry about, we had an election those gosh darn fear mongers don't know what they are talking about")
  • It's not productive. Your belief that there will be an election in November or in 2028 should not change any of your behavior, it's simply a demoralizing statement with no call to action, that is the opposite of what american freedom fighters need. Ultimately all it accomplishes is to make a bunch of anti-facists dislike Ken for making anti-facist statements.
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

its hardly pointless dooming when trump has literally expressed vivid interest in getting rid of elections because he is terrified of losing and facing accountability.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The entire point of saying there won’t be (fair) elections is to plan what the fuck to do it that proves true.

God damn these people for blocking those on their side because they aren’t saying what they want to hear.

There are plans in place to split this country and to destroy 100 million Americans.

Doomerism is burying your damn head in the sand and pretending they aren’t legally starting to set up their split in LAW (which they are starting with Texas right now). Come on!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 days ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 24 points 4 days ago

You don't have a right to privacy or your "own space" in a public forum, and the fucking self importance to tell people what they may or may not say online because you personally feel morally superior to them is straight up juvenile. You can always leave.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 4 days ago

Ken Jennings is not prepared for the possibility of no elections, emotionally, so he tries every trick in the book to shut down that topic. That or he's being paid off.

If you find the subject distasteful, translate that into action rather than whining about words.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 26 points 4 days ago (4 children)

They don't need to cancel the election. All they need to do is install a few armed ICE people outside every polling place in Democrat areas.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›