this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
408 points (99.5% liked)

politics

27069 readers
1970 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

Traitors! Bought and paid for by Citizens United.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 21 hours ago

With Democrats like these it doesn't take a genius to wonder why 1/3rd of the US didn't show up to vote.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 23 hours ago

Useless fucking losers

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 21 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Who needs the diet version of fascists?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 19 hours ago

Those that refuse to admit that is what they are

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

The midterms won’t save us. Pitchforks will.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 15 points 22 hours ago

Yet people get mad when you say both parties are working together.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago

"Democrats agree with fascism and wont oppose it."

Tell us something we don't know.

[–] jenings@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just don’t see how anyone can hear this and see them as effective leadership. Minority party or not. Like it makes me, a dedicated left wing person, not want to support democrats because they seem to have lost the plot

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 23 hours ago

They haven’t lost the plot, they like the plot. They don’t agree with you, they don’t like you, they don’t want to help you.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Completely agree. There are no US politicians who are willing to offer social progress or even support middle-class workers. If you're not a campaign donor, you can't get shit in this country.

Not that it matters who votes for who. After the 2024 election, it's obvious the winner isn't decided by votes anyway.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

PRIMARY ALL OF THE FUCKING DEMOCRATS!!!

Unless they are actively opposing this regime, they are complicit. Full stop. Some worse than others, but just replacing Schumer won't do shit if the rest of the Democrats in Congress are the same milk toast centrist corporate assholes.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Dear Leader has something on both of them.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

Or just Schumer thinks the issue is the person leading ICE and DHS, not that they have too much impunity.

[–] human@slrpnk.net 126 points 1 day ago (4 children)

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,” Jeffries told reporters.

Didn't realize this was an inappropriate time to try to stop them from kidnapping and murdering people.

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,”

That would be Flight of the Pigs O'Clock.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 22 hours ago

Jeffries has always struck me as someone lukewarm, uncharismatic, and even unintelligent. So many better options for that position, but he was chosen for the obvious virtue signal.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,” Jeffries told reporters.

Counterpoint: no you fucking won't

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Well, you know... It's friday.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 133 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dont listen to their words, only watch their actions. By actions alone, these 2 are MAGA.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yup, they are republican plants.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 37 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Primary these worthless fucks

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

No need to wait. The elected Democrats can vote them out of their leadership positions now.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New York 8 you know what to do -- primary Jeffries. Start looking for your candidate now.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

There's got to be a viable progressive candidate

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Genuinely worse than anyone on the right, IMO, who at least tell you to your face what they believe

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago

They will not go against the wishes of their donors. They do not represent their voters.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am so disappointed in Jeffries. When Pelosi stepped back, I thought we might get some change but that was dumb of me to think a Democrat would have a spine. They are so floppy.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 19 hours ago

Lost hope in it as soon as she announced a successor instead of letting anyone else try.

Especially as he's as strong and effective as a wet paper bag

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 hours ago

He has a spine. He faces criticism and outrage from people like you every day. He likes what is happening. Wealthy Democratic Party donors like what is happening. They want a paramilitary police state.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago

Unseat these cowards

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I mean of course they didn't because they're worthless democrats.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Democrats are why we have fascism ascendant in this country by refusing to be an opposition party.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

It's so much worse than it needs to be for no reason. They don't have the numbers to do anything, but they could at least fucking PRETEND to care that they can't.

"Well, you guys are trying your best, but there's nothing you can do without the numbers."

"No, no... let's be clear... Even if we had the numbers, we are INTENTIONALLY not doing anything."

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Add em to the list

[–] pantomime@leminal.space 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I swear man, people don't hate neoliberals enough. Complete traitors to our country, and for what? Hard times require strong, courageous people to take charge and lead. The average American that voted for Harris in 2024 has more love for this country and bigger balls than these people ever will. Absolute cowards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Controlled opposition operating accordingly

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point they are openly collaborating. Opposition, my ass.

That’s what controlled opposition means. It’s a front to act as a stress relief valve for people who oppose the regime.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm beginning to think they both spent a lot of time raping trafficked children on Trump and Epstein's Pedophile Island and need the distraction.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Spineless cowards

load more comments
view more: next ›