this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
7 points (88.9% liked)

London

1313 readers
28 users here now

"who’d a thunk it"

For discussion about London including the surrounding Greater London area. Discuss all things from news, travel, culture, and general life around the capital and largest city of England!

Rules and other welcoming info can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Instead of relying on conventional sensors, these devices use clouds of atoms cooled to near absolute zero. At those temperatures, atoms start to behave strangely — acting as both particles and waves. As the atoms “fall” through a sensor, their wave patterns shift in response to acceleration. Using what’s effectively an ultra-precise optical ruler, the system can read these changes with extraordinary accuracy, without needing satellites at all.

Is it really too much to place a 50p zigbee proximity sensor, at 100m intervals along a line, and mesh them together?

The totality of tube line sprawl is near 400km[0]. Quick math:

  • 400e3/100 = 4000 sensors needed
  • 4000 * £0.50 = £2,000

There, I just saved the goverment a million quid

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Underground_infrastructure#Lines

[–] Dupelet@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Or just put a standard accelerometer on a train and recalibrate automatically at each station. Wtf is this quantum mechanic use case

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

I'd be more interested if they managed to invent tube trains which defy the rules of quantum mechanics.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Fucking 2(!) videos start playing on that site, what the fuck.