Doesn't sound very neutral to me.
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
89 points (97.8% liked)
Europe
8498 readers
1326 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You (and everyone upvoting) have no idea what Switzerland neutrality means. It's not like you could just read up an official Swiss government document about it (PDF warning)
This is standard procedure, freezing the assets of dictators so that the country can get them back. This is to help the Venezuelan people. Here, other examples of similar cases.
Ever since the Marcos (Philippines) affair in 1986, the list of illicit potentate funds that have been seized in Swiss banks and later returned to the country has steadily grown to include Montesinos (Peru), Mobutu (former Zaire), Dos Santos (Angola), Abacha (Nigeria), Kazakhstan, Salinas (Mexico), Duvalier (Haiti), Ben Ali (Tunisia), and Mubarak (Egypt).
neutrality means that we take everyone's money!
Did they freeze Trumps assets yet, if they're so vigilant about dictators?
Sure bro, that's why they did it now and not last year.
“No bro you dont understand swissland, we just have to take everyone’s money by law! its for your own good, trust me bro we are neutral, we will give it back”
Neutrality doesn't mean inaction.
It certainly means not taking sides in other's conflicts.
That is inaccurate. By making sure a future legitimate Venezuelan government gets Maduros stolen corruption money, and not him, Switzerland is taking the side of international law.
Oh, so he's been convicted by the Hague or another court that might have jurisdiction?
I mean I'm personally sure he's actually a despicable corrupt dictator and should face consequences, but if this was about international law, Switzerland would have frozen his assets when he supposedly doctored the last election, not when he'd just conveniently been illegally kidnapped and couldn't fight back. This is clearly about appeasing the orange rapist and nothing else.
Just like everyone froze Putlers money ca 2004? 2012? 2014?
Be realistic. When exactly to freeze is a political decision. Why do you expect a tiny country to expose itself when others 100x more powerful won't? And still haven't, by the way. Maduro can get his money from UK accounts as we speak, but I don't see you hating on them.
Yes, you get it, it's about corrupt power and not the law.
This action was in accord with international and national law
Funny how it only happened after the illegal act of war then
Yes, this was already pointed out, please refer to the previous reply
Why do you expect a tiny country to expose itself when others 100x more powerful won't?
I don't? They could have just stayed out of it but chose to "expose" themselves just now when it was convenient. If you're not going to speak up against injustice then don't, but then own it. Don't come swooping down like a vulture once it's safe and act like you're all just and good and "for the people of Venezuela".
Please don't conflate things. The parent suggested this was done in the interest of the USA, which is not the case, this is in the interest of Venezuela.
Also, please don't call me names.
The parent suggested this was done in the interest of the USA
No, I suggested this was done in the interest of the orange rapist, which is not the same. Targeting the person currently in his sights is absolutely meant to gain browny points with him (and likely to work for a time). If it was meant to achieve anything else, it could and should have been done much earlier.
this is in the interest of Venezuela.
Maybe coincidentally. That entirely depends on with whom the assets end up, which remains to be seen.
Also, please don't call me names.
I did not.
Switzerland being complicit in the dealings of fascist states, as always.
The assets are frozen in anticipation of a future legitimate Venezuelan request for return of Maduros corruption money.
This is done for Venezuela.
This is done for Venezuela.
Exactly, it says:
" The asset freeze does not affect members of the current Venezuelan government, and Switzerland said it will seek to return any funds found to be illicitly acquired to benefit the Venezuelan people."
"The asset freeze was a precautionary measure and applied to Maduro and his associates as foreign politically exposed persons, the government said."
The account owners were arrested and are under duress, and nobody knows yet who the legal new head of state is. So anybody with some access (including Maduro pressured by US) could illegally seize it. That's why they froze the accounts for now.
Every time Switzerland does anything that makes world news the comments are full of stupid, uninformed hate. I think it's 90% jealeousy of its wealth and success and 10% actual resentment because of shameful things done in WW2. I'd like to see them survive being surrounded by huge fascist militaries for 5 years while being a tiny country and manage as little collaboration as there was.
Yeah - the question really is why that money was allowed to be in Switzerland all those years.
Because Maduro wasn't sanctioned by a body that Switzerland recognizes as binding.
However now that he's fallen, they are freezing his money to give it back to the country when it asks for it.
Did they freeze Trump assets yet?
By doing it after Maduro's kidnapping—rather than before, independently of US foreign policy—Switzerland is tacitly accepting the right of the U.S. to interfere in Venezuelan politics, a matter in which no U.S. court has jurisdiction. I don't like Maduro any more than the next dictator, but the U.S. shouldn't have illegally kidnapped him and murdered dozens of Cubans and Venezuelans in the process, and countries like the UK and Switzerland shouldn't be normalizing this violation of international law by any means.
Huh, how did it get there? Swiss commenters keep saying that dictators can no longer hide money there?
In contrast with the UK, the USA and others, Switzerland has been implementing OECD standards for automatic information exchange with foreign tax authorities for more than a decade.
But hey, dumb US films keep talking about "Swiss accounts", so it must be true, right? Also please don't look at Delaware, Virgin Islands or Panama.