this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
248 points (99.6% liked)

News

33846 readers
1974 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The clip was part of the latest batch of files the Trump Administration released related to Epstein, but was later taken down without an explanation from the department.

The fake video apparently made it into the FBI’s Epstein files because someone had emailed it to the bureau with a query asking if it was real. According to analysis by Wired magazine, the 12-second video appeared to match footage uploaded to YouTube in 2019 with a description that read “rendering 3D graphics”; other outlets, including the BBC, said they had traced the video back to footage posted on the platform in 2020. A document that was posted just before the video in the Department of Justice’s initial release includes a message from outside the government asking if the video is real, Wired wrote.

The Department of Justice did not respond to a request from TIME on Tuesday about why the footage was removed, or why it was released in the first place.

The fake footage was shared widely on social media Monday and has been cited as an example of the challenges the Department of Justice has faced as it works to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which President Trump signed into law on Nov. 19, giving the department 30 days to make public all of its case files about Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 69 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s called “muddying the water” and its desperation.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 9 points 16 hours ago

I'm glad they are desperate. Keep Pushing! Cuz, we're not done, yet!

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 95 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

You'd think the world's wealthiest nation would be able to at least create fake evidence that isn't immediately recognizable as such.

Yet another brick in the towering monument to these people's stupidity.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 86 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

No, they are doing this on purpose. Create obvious fakes, and "release" them along with everything else, just so that if something meaningful gets released they can claim it is fake, too.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 55 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

My latest conspiracy theory is that is why so much money is being dumped into AI. They want to make AI video so convincing that when the real videos come out, everyone can claim it's AI.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Considering they can't even properly redact I think you're giving them too much credit.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 10 points 16 hours ago

But when the AI gets properly good, it will be able to do all the redacting!

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 7 points 16 hours ago

Same with all the "funny" AI videos getting released by the admin and federal agencies. Normalize fake videos so they can claim anything is fake.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Fascists are sending their best. If they were smart they wouldn't be fascists, but they're literally terrified of pronouns and cities

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely. The world is more frightening now than it has been at any point in my life, but I still wake up every morning thankful that, for the most part, evil continues to prove itself to be utterly inept.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

"Oft evil will shall evil mar"

[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't this prove that the moon landing was real? They can't make a convincing fake in 2025 but they could in 1969?

Honestly, so many conspiracy theories are debunked by how fucking stupidly this actual conspiracy has been handled.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

For logical, sane people, yeah.

But conspiracy theorists have never been people who are willing to consider alternative points of view.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Well, one of the things that is happening in the background is brain drain - both at a broader national scale, as well as just within the government. Turns out that breaking bad and going fascist doesn’t sit well with most skilled and intelligent people, so they’re at best phoning it in and maliciously complying, and at worst just leaving their jobs so someone less competent steps in.

[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

I have no doubt that, once this administration and our collective national nightmare are over, that there will be thousands of accounts of people in federal service doing what little they can to slow the machine down from the inside.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

They just need more water

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago

So tacit admission they are indeed hiding incriminating evidence

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In the chaos of everything I totally missed this happening last week, but seems like kind of a big deal.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

How is it a big deal? We know that it's not real, that it wasn't claimed to be real by its creators, and that the FBI has it because it was emailed to them by someone with an innocent question about it. I can see either including it in the release because it's technically in the FBI's Epstein file, or omitting it from the release because it actually isn't relevant information. It looks like the FBI chose the latter policy once they became aware that they had released the video (presumably as part of a bulk upload) and they Streisand-Effected themselves by removing it. I'm not familiar with the specific text of the law so I don't know which option is more in accordance with it, but either way I don't see any substantive issue at all.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The DOJ shouldn't be posting anything (especially regarding this case) without first verifying the authenticity of the contents of the post. It's a big deal because their quality control is optically terrible, and that's a very bad look for what's supposed to be the top of the justice ladder.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's not an authentic video of Epstein, but it is an authentic part of their file on Epstein. You seem to be saying that they should not have posted it but my understanding of the law is that they should have posted it and not removed it.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's fake, they shouldn't post it at all.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

You want to give the FBI a lot more power to choose, unilaterally and without oversight, which parts of the Epstein files to keep from the public than I do.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It wasn't part of any files, it was fucking fake.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It was both in the files and fucking fake.

Edit: it has since been removed

If I'm wrong please let me know.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Department of jokes

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

sheer incompetence- meritocracy is long gone; nepotism has taken back over