this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
470 points (99.6% liked)

News

33815 readers
2981 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Good thing I only drink bottled soda

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But my tap water has PFAS and lead...so I guess I get to pick my poison?

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 2 points 3 hours ago

RO plant... Installed?

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Cool, well I must have drank several thousand of these throughout my life before water bottles really became a thing, so no biggie I'm sure.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

People are making fun of me because I'm going out of my way to avoid plastics. "You've already been exposed to decades worth" and "You'll never avoid it all" and a bunch of other logical fallacies borne out of good old fashioned defeatism.

Crinkly thin water bottles are the worst, as are bottles that have been exposed to UV light, so if you HAVE to use bottled water try and find thick PET bottles and keep them out of the sun.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 hours ago

every now and then, on days like this, I am reminded that some countries don't think potable water is a basic right for their citizens

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yeah, my entire country relies on bottled water. I can't drink from the tap. I need to buy carboys constantly because we can't really afford a water filter right now, and I doubt it'd come out as pure anyway. Of all the great things we do have, potable water for human consumption isn't one of them. *sad Mexican noises*

E: On the bright side, you may be able to get a glass carboy and fill it up at one of the new refilling centers that are popping up all around the city, so at least you have a say on the type of container you use and get your water all at a fraction of the price that Coke and Pepsi sell it for!

[–] iamanurd@midwest.social 30 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I don’t know how to judge 90,000 microplastic particles as a quantity.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's the fun thing about all this. Nobody knows. Is it much? Is it nothing? Is it dangerous? There is no people without microplastics in them, there is no way to have the control group for an experiement.
Everyone kinda suspects it can't be good, nobody has any fucking idea is it really

[–] saimen@feddit.org 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean they could set in relation to the absolute values. Does a person who doesn't drink bottled water ingests 100 or 100.000 particles?

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Oh, that's measurable. What isn't exactly measurable is what ingesting whatever number of particles does to you

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

We know some of the effects, like endocrine and cellular disruption, which should be damning enough but the media likes to make it sound like microplastics may not be bad, people are being alarmist, etc. Because the media is owned by people who would be negatively affected by a plastic ban. Much like how we know tire and brake dust is a cause of autism, but no one is willing to put that in a headline.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The link between tire and brake dust to ASD isn't a concrete causation yet. The papers do show a correlation, yes, but that isn't the same as definitive proof of causation.

For example, areas with higher tire/brake dust will have higher vehicle traffic, so it might be some other pollutant vehicles produce.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Most public health policy (and hell, most of medicine) is based on correlation. Causation isn’t generally needed and sometimes it’s not even possible to prove.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Sure. But they were responding to the claim that “we know tires and break dust is a cause of autism”. Not “there seems to be a correlation, so maybe we should err on the side of abundant caution and treat it as if it’s causal when drafting public policy.” The correction was warranted.

[–] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Tire and brake dust causes autism? This explains mechanics.

[–] hunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It is about a five fluid footballfields.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Can you convert that to hamburgers or bald eagles?

[–] hunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

All bald eagles flew away due to fascism. Sorry.

Which hamburger? Kfc, mac, wendy, fiveguys?

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Which hamburger? Kfc, mac, wendy, fiveguys?

Listen buddy, if I wanted a precise unit of measurement I'd be using metric.

Follow your heart~❤️

[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

From the article, this might help:

Sajedi reviewed over 140 scientific papers to determine the effects of plastic bottles on the human body. She found that people ingest an average of 39,000 to 52,000 microplastic particles per year from food and drinking water, and those who use bottled water on a daily basis ingest nearly 90,000 more microplastic particles into their bodies.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I think they should be presenting that as particles per liter. At least the chemists among us would know, and they'd hold up their hands and say, "about this much!" /s

[–] nert@lemmy.zip 8 points 12 hours ago

How bad is it compared to RO? The membranes, pipes, fittings are all plastic.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who's worked on a millionaire's yacht that refused to drink anything besides a gallon of Fiji a day and produced more plastic waste than all of West Palm Beach combined, thanks. This is the sweetest slice of schadenfreude pie I've had all week 🥧

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

that's two orders of magnitude lower than being of significance. they're microplastics. i might end up with a centiplastic at most that way. call me when they figure out how to get a million more plastics

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

"Particles" is almost useless as a measure. They're not movie tickets, I'm not interested in their discreet number. Give me a defined quantity. Is 10,000 particles 1 gram, half a gram, a tenth of a gram, what?

"You're eating far too many particles of salt, we're going to need to to cut back by at least 2,000 particles every lunar cycle."

[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, I'm waiting for the comments in the style of "an average person ingests 3*10^12 plastic particles each year." I have no reference to the number.

[–] lime@feddit.nl 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I looked up what constitutes a unit of microplastics and the definition I found in this article was “any synthetic solid particle or polymeric matrix, with regular or irregular shape and with size ranging from 1 μm to 5 mm, of either primary or secondary manufacturing origin, which are insoluble in water”. 

Because “microplastics” is a broad term that covers particles of varying size, structure, and weight, researchers refer to them in terms of number of particles per unit or total mass of microplastics per sample.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

Great, how convenient that the latter option is based on mass, just as the OP requested. The researchers should clarify the number based on total mass.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago

It's also meaningless without the context of how many particles other people consume.

She found that people ingest an average of 39,000 to 52,000 microplastic particles per year from food and drinking water, and those who use bottled water on a daily basis ingest nearly 90,000 more microplastic particles into their bodies.

Aha! So, now a more informative headline could be something like, "People Who Drink Bottled Water on a Daily Basis Ingest 3 Times as Many Microplastic Particles Each Year."

Which I would argue is also far scarier than just some out of context bigish number.

But, I'm with you on ditching "particles" altogether and providing it in a standard measurement.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It's also significantly more expensive than buying a filter.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 12 hours ago

Although my filter is made of plastic and the water travels through plastic pipes. I'm wondering how much of that becomes microplastics.

I mean I'm not going to stop, because I'm fucking full of them anyway, but still...

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 23 hours ago (13 children)

These threads are always a sad look past the curtain. Is drinkable tap water really that common around the world? I thought that was a rich people thing when I saw it in cartoons as a kid.

Knowing vaguely how municipal plumbing works I find the idea that so many pipes and fittings could be clean enough to drink from to be utopian fan fiction. We have storage for water since there’s really only pressure a few hours per week, at its best. I have the contact info of over ten water cistern drivers in case it’s out for too long - and it very often is.

Our tap water’s good enough to shower and wash dishes and clothes in, but not nearly enough to drink. It even doesn’t taste like the smell of diesel 300 days out of the year. Yeah we have filters, no sand is crusting up my washing machine’s valves anytime soon, but it won’t keep the bacteria out.

Drinking from plastic containers of various sizes between 300ml and 24L is the only fucking option for most people on the planet right now. It’s cheap in these places too, obviously.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 30 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Is drinkable tap water really that common around the world? I thought that was a rich people thing when I saw it in cartoons as a kid.

In basically the entire first world: yes, drinkable tap water is the norm. Even living in the middle of nowhere USA, you have well water and it is perfectly drinkable. (That is to say, rural American homes have their own well, water pump, and filtration system)

there’s really only pressure a few hours per week

Water towers are common and completely solve this issue. Even during power outages, gravity still works and water towers provide pressurized, drinkable water to everyone in the area.

You should look into getting a well installed. This is something you and your immediate neighbors could all benefit from and could go in together on if you can't afford it yourself.


If you don't mind me asking, what country do you live in? What you are saying is not something that is common in entire continents.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 21 hours ago (12 children)

I’m in Lebanon. Your comment is reminding me how unusually flat the ground is where most of you live lol.

Most of us live on mountains with very messy elevation changes. Water towers are extremely uncommon. Generally, water is poorly filtered by the public water companies, then pumped uphill by dirty old pumps through dirty old pipes. Lebanon generates something like a third of its electricity demand, so… pumping is not constant.

Also single family homes are much rarer, most of us live in buildings that are 3-6 floors high. Water happens on the building level.

The water usually fills into a sort of well, a بير (pronounced like “beer”), not all buildings have that. Where I live, that’s the main bulk storage for water split among all the neighbors in the building. The water then gets pumped up to a large central holding tank on the roof (إمّاية ≈ “mother” tank), from which it then trickles it down to the individual apartments’ tanks (خزّانات = tanks) on the roof. Top floors need a pressure pump if they’re too close to the roof. Keep in mind that pumps need electricity, which we don’t always have. Floater valves everywhere. In my own building, my family and I have set up a rudimentary rainwater collection system. It’s not much, it’s not exceptionally clean, but it wasn’t ever either of those things. You can call a cistern man to fill your بير (“beer”).

We’ve had a main pop on our street before. It was a pathetic dribble of water seeping through cracks in the asphalt.

Re: wells, we used to be able to drink from the old town wells, but years of neglect and improper sewage handling means that you really really should not drink from them. I remember drinking from them as a kid, although my parents disapproved. Situation is worse now, I don’t drink well water anymore. The bad part is that well water was only drinkable in pretty rural towns, the worse part is that climate change has wrecked our groundwater supply and the wells I drank from as a kid have run dry. There’s less gentle rains and melting snow, and more summery Decembers with catastrophic, sudden storms. There are rivers I’ve swam in that are now stagnant little green spots. Cisterns are getting more expensive and more essential, and they’re struggling to fill them.

When my parents were kids they claim they could drink tap water. 15 years of brutal civil war and twice as much crony neoliberal “reconstruction” years later and nobody has dreamed up a contrived enough profit incentive to reliably deliver water and electricity. There are tribes warring in Sub-Saharan Africa with better basic utilities than we do because we live in an utterly dysfunctional feudal society. We’re technically in a continuous drought, but we have no mechanism to declare a drought season with drought measures.

That can’t be thaaaaaaaaat uncommon, riiiiiiiiight?

Here’s a funny story: when I was a kid, we got a dishwasher, and one of the first things you do is use the water hardness test strips and configure something in the machine. We rapidly learned that each cisternful of water was completely different and the only way around it was to underfill the salt tank and inshallah. Worked fine and still does.

Now you know why we pay 2-3 water bills per month. Come back tomorrow for the two power bills (power company and power mafia) and two Internet bills (it’s complicated). Surely I can bang out a few more manic 5 am comments this Christmas season.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Man this is spot on for the rural Philippines too, right down to the well details And the pathetic trickle of tap water for. Few hrs a day. At least it rains more in the Philippines I guess.

[–] fatcat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago

That was a really interesting read, thank you for the insight.

So cool to hear from lebanon.. first world country mates dont really realize how much they take things for granted lol.. things like 24/7 electricity and drinking tap water supply isnt rlly a thing in so many regions..

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ya know, this really makes you think about the upper limit of plastic microparticles that can fit into a human asshole doesn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›