this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
374 points (97.9% liked)

News

33795 readers
2558 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was a wake-up call for America. In January, Donald Trump took the oath of office, declared himself “saved by God to make America great again” and issued a barrage of executive orders. In the ensuing months the US president and his allies moved at breakneck speed and seemed indomitable.

But as 2025 draws to a close with Trump struggling to stay awake at meetings, the prevailing image is of a driver asleep at the wheel. Opinion polls suggest that Americans are turning against him. Republicans are heading for the exit ahead of congressional contests next November that look bleak for the president’s party.

“He came into office and, like a blitzkrieg, was violating laws and the constitution,” said Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota. “The American political process is slow-moving and so he was able to do things that were extraordinary.

“But this is a guy whose legacy may well be the political collapse of Republicans in this era. Put another way, rather than asking who is going to be the inheritor of the Trump mantle and the so-called Maga movement, we may be talking in a year or so about which candidates can escape the odious distinction of having been connected with Trump.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Republicans are an enemy of democracy and the constitution

[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 3 points 2 hours ago

“A wake-up call for America”, just like when the same exact thing happened a few years ago.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That fucker had been working as hard as he can to get us into a war so that he can cancel the elections. His eyes lit up here: https://www.indy100.com/politics/trump/donald-trump-election-2028-war-zelensky-ukraine

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 10 points 8 hours ago

Personally, I would like MAGATs to be dragged down by gravity. Then swing a long while.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

There will be a very convenient outbreak of extreme violence. Even though there's no legal provision to do so, Congress will allow Clownstick to "suspend" the Constitution. No election means Republicans hold power permanently.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trump surrounded by MAGAt loyalists:

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Farquaad is such an apt comparison.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Brace all you want you piece of shit, you're still gonna burn.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 23 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They enabled this president

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I mean, it's still win for them, huge win. A lot of the government is destroyed forever, a lot of the elements that were holding the democracy together are now gone, a lot of suffering was inflicted, many people dead. That's all what they wanted and they got it in spades. No matter what, there will be more of that for a foreseeable future.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 12 hours ago

yup. this all could have been avoided. all it would have taken is a few republicans with a moral backbone. but what the punks been saying since the 70s is true: no republicans have a moral backbone, if they did they wouldn't be republicans and most of the democrats don't have moral backbones either

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago

And how many more months until then?

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Can't wait for the DNC to give us the most mediocre selections possible, for 60% of the country to not vote, and for the fascist to once again have a majority.

(Optimistic, I know)

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

They already have. Susan Collins VS Janet Mills in Maine. Unpopular governor running in an unpopular district, against a 40 year incumbent. Pretty sure we're gonna need an independent to steal that seat away, and no good looking candidates with 11 months left to go. Not looking good. Can't wait for the radio commercials.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

DNC: we can't allow extremists. Also these conservatives make some great points.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 19 points 19 hours ago

DNC: We are sick and tired of MAGA walking over us! We'll only give them half of what they want, and then the other half later.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Just don't have elections, then. Or just say the GOP won and contest everywhere, losing GOP reps refuse to leave until the election is 'fair'. Never admit it's fair and never leave. Then the takeover is complete as they never have to give up their positions.

I'm not confident at all, that if Trump and the GOP tried to refuse to leave, the mechanisms intended to remove them, will be allowed to function. The GOP controls everything right now, which means all the mechanisms of power, and with it the authority of those positions within the functioning of government. They can just all agree to act as if they won, just like Trump already tried to do by refusing to concede in 2016. He didn't have enough loyalists in power that time. This time around they control everything and are ensuring loyalists hold those positions so when Trump demands to stay president, all those positions** of government act like he is. That's when civil disobedience of bureaucrats and military starts happening, or civil war erupts, or America is a completely fascist state.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Yea they don't even need to try to steal the election this time, it's already stolen. These people aren't leaving they are entrenched by the crimes they are committing. They can't let law and order come back or they risk losing everything.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 21 points 21 hours ago (15 children)

Remember when the vote was between an old, richbitch, white, fat, senile narcissist preying on girls and women and with no clue about business or government; and a younger, black woman with experience in government and a career built on prosecuting predators? That was a slam dunk, wasn't it?

[–] graysonuniverse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

YOU WILL VOTE FOR OUR CORPORATE STOOGE AND YOU WILL LIKE IT!

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I would have been happy with as little as "not voting for a convicted felon and sex offender", but here we are. I naively believed the US want that full of shitty hateful people. Boy was I wrong.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'd have voted for a felon and sex offender - if they were honest, owned up to their shit, did their time, made amends if possible, and made genuine and necessary changes and worked on not being a pos.

I would trust that 100x more than almost any politician.

But that is so far from trump who is just a piece of shit.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago

There should have been a primary, Biden promised that he would be a one time president

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›