this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
476 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

17865 readers
2175 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It's amazing how complicated just the O2 cycle is. Basically, we don't yet how to do it without a whole planet being involved.

Like, plants do release O2 sometimes, but they also use O2 as fuel when they grow. Growing a plant requires light. On the earth that's easy, just put it in the sun. On Mars there's no atmosphere and no magnetic field, so if you just put a plant on the surface they'll die. So, you need to grow them underground in a mostly earth-like atmosphere at mostly earth-like pressure lit by artificial lights.

So, you plant a lot of plants deep underground lit by bright artificial lights. Then you need to supply the plants with a lot of water. Some of that water will be released into the air, but some of it will be incorporated into the plant's body. There's a whole water cycle that isn't yet fully understood.

What about the soil? On earth worms and other bugs break down leaf litter and other things into usable soil and bees pollinate many of the plants. So, do you ship up a bunch of bugs? You'd have to supply a whole ecosystem of them so they live in balance. You could go with hydroponics instead, but then you'd need a constant supply of nutrients for the plants, and given the amount of plant matter needed for just one human, that would be a huge supply of nutrients.

I'd love to see another honest, scientifically rigorous attempt at a biosphere project. Building a closed ecosystem on Earth is easy-mode compared to doing it anywhere else, but so far all the Biospheres have been failures. IMO until we can easily do it on Earth, we're nowhere near ready to do it in space, on the moon, or on another planet.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

On Mars there’s no atmosphere and no magnetic field, so if you just put a plant on the surface they’ll die. So, you need to grow them underground in a mostly earth-like atmosphere at mostly earth-like pressure lit by artificial lights.

you can put algae in a plastic bag and grow them in there, so they're in a pressurized container so there's enough air pressure in there for them.

sth like this: link to post

i've actually been thinking about this exact problem, and you don't actually need to grow wheat on mars. you only need calories, protein, fats, vitamins, fiber. you can get calories and protein from algae (which you can grow in small plastic tubes/boxes). Spirulina (bacteria type) is a typical candidate for that.

It's especially protein-rich. Growing it would require less than 1000 m² per person, i think, though i'm not sure.

growing salad for vitamins and fiber takes significantly less area (maximum 50 m² per person) and can be done indoors, wherever you live.

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

asking with no experience in this field, what about those 50+ year old glass jars with worms and plants and stuff in them? Do those not count for some reason?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They work, but there are no humans inside them.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

biologically, humans aren't that special. if you can reliably sustain insects in an ecosystem, it's not that big of a jump to feed humans as well.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 2 points 54 minutes ago

Soon the movie of project hail mary releases.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 36 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

That was the biosphere 2 experiment. Turns out it's very difficult to sustain the plants without the rest of the planet.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Remember how Biosphere 2 went so badly that the crew nearly starved to death, but no one bothered doing a Biosphere 3? That might be a good step before attempting long-term Moon or Mars missions.

[–] Darkness343@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Keep trying until it works?

What are you, a mockery of real humans?

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 9 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, I think of that every time somebody starts talking about fallout shelters, space stations or bases on the moon or Mars. It's definitely not a solved problem.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No, we just need more money and it'll be fine.

That's the thing about centralized planning-you think everything's possible if you just throw more slaves at the problem. And modern autocrats (musk, bezos, bin-salman) don't seem to understand that this just isn't true.

Edita;: they're trying to do new kinds of things, rather than 'big building', and it just doesn't work for that. You need thought for that.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Also, have you seen how HUGE the thing was?

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

3.14 acres of enclosed space, and still barely enough to support a crew of eight people. I think OP is going to need a bigger bag of plants.

Entropy is a bitch

[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 51 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

TLDW: a fuckload of plants

[–] theorychapter@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Guess I should pack two fuckloads just in case

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@piefed.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What about the tertiary backup fuckload?

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 3 points 5 hours ago

The third fuckload has to be stored off-site. Also, make sure to use at least two different kinds of plants.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 26 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Plants actually use O2 themselves a lot of the time, so we would still need to truck in a whole bunch of that stuff in. Also the amount of plants needed for just a single human is huge. Most plants are rather bad at producing O2. Most of it actually comes from algae living in water, not potted plants. The YouTube channel Joel Creates did an experiment with how much algae you would actually need to breathe. It's like a lot, a lot a lot really. Building some place on Mars or even in orbit that such a large amount of algae could happily live is pretty hard. Hell it's pretty hard on Earth, where you don't need to worry about temperature and pressure going out of spec or stuff like radiation. These days we do have pretty effective LED grow lights that prevent the whole thing from becoming too hot. From movies people think space is cold, but getting rid of heat is a big problem. With that much light blasting into the water, the temperature rises and the algae will die from that at some point. So radiating away all that heat is a must. On Mars or the Moon this is easier as the surrounding rocks could be used as a heat sink. The actual real hard part is not just building this, but building it in a way that can support human life for a long time. Systems such as these are chaotic in nature and often suffer from cascade failure modes. If a little thing goes wrong and some of the algae dies, it often cascades into a full failure where all of it dies off. So there would need to be many smaller systems, isolated as much as possible to prevent cascading failures. The system would also need to be modular enough so it would be easy to disconnect a module, completely clean and sterilize it and put it back into use. With staggered phases applied as to not have large swings in output. As these systems would be rather large in scale and have many different complex parts, a high level of automation is required. And we haven't even touched on getting all of this constructed somewhere and have it bootstrapped with enough water, with the right stuff in it and none of the wrong stuff. Enough reliable energy and nutrients to feed it all and transport living algae there to kick it all off. As far as I know nobody has ever gotten close to anything like this on Earth, let alone in space or on a place like the Moon or Mars. It would be a project that rivals the original Moon landings.

It might sound like a simple enough concept and it is how we are currently living on this planet, so it should be possible. However keep in mind our planet has had huge swings in temperatures and atmospheric composition. There were many many times in Earth's past where humans could not survive the conditions and we evolved here.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Yup. Trees are basically carbon neutral.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There's a great book called "A City on Mars" and it's mostly about stuff like this. Why colonizing mars is absolutely stupid

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Difficult and stupid aren't the same thing. There aren't many goals on the same scale of human progress.

The attempt would likely teach us lessons about our own atmosphere and maintaining it. Learning the failure conditions of a biosphere and how to avert disaster seems extremely relevant for the upcoming decades.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago

OK, let me rephrase, because i'm misrepresenting the book.

Colonizing Mars is extremely, insanely complex and we have no idea how to even start, and there are SO many better places that we need to try first unless we're just willing to throw away lives (and trillions of dollars). It goes pretty deeply into all the stuff we either don't know but need to know, or know but can't fix, and of course there's all the stuff we don't know we don't know. It discusses the insane logistical effort you need just get the bare minimum going, and how it's not remotely like living there for a year, or colonizing a new country.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago

NASA should let me put a plastic Koi pond on Mars and dump in a ton of algae killer, it'll cover a hemisphere in a week.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 39 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I drew a factory with the smoke stacks making a u-turn and stuck into the ground. Seemed like a good way to keep pollution from going into the air.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 19 points 12 hours ago

You illustrated 'clean coal'.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

There isn’t enough CO2 for that either. Mars’s total atmospheric pressure is way less than 1% of Earth’s. Mars is closer to the Moon in terms of atmosphere than it is to Earth!

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 29 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Did you not see the plastic bag keeping the air inside? This is a flawless design.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Ahhh. I thought that was just the haze of the red planet!

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

a place for our grocery plastic bags to have a new life a good life

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 10 hours ago

so we need moon plants to colonize mars then

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 19 points 13 hours ago

You need to keep it down because CO2 is heavier than O2

Congratulations, you're thinking like a billionaire!

Or were at 12.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Gonna need a lot more plants

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The atmosphere is in the plastic shopping bag.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I thought it was just a yellow background!

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 1 points 22 minutes ago

My guess is dollar general is the source.