this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
88 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1998 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Maiq@piefed.social 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He'll give it an unimaginative name like "the big beautiful boat".

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago

Beauty McBigBoat

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait, it's floating.  Should a Trump class ship be floating?

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

The defense contractor doesn't really care if they are useless as long as they can drag out the construction contracts for decades and keep the gravy train flowing.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago

Might as well call it a dreadnought for all the value a battleship will have in modern naval combat.

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why aren't we naming appropriate things after him? Next new strain of syphilis, perfect.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Only if said strain is widespread amongst children.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious to see what the Navy thinks a modern battleship should look like and do.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And they fall apart immediately.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 8 points 8 months ago

Most military equipment is crap as it is. The common misconception of "military-grade" being top-notch is actually bullshit.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

Mf can’t stop naming shit and can’t fix anything while America drowns in its own capitalistic sea of sharks.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Let me guess, they're big piles of expensive, stinky shit

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

LOL! They're gonna be mothballed soon after he's gone, what do you want to bet?

Decomission central.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They won't even be built. He will just funnel a bunch of money to his defense contractor buddies.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

Just like the Great Wall down south he built very strongly.

[–] keyhoh@piefed.social 5 points 8 months ago

Let's hope they have the same quality and integrity.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Actual battleships? How well will they fare against modern weapons?

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If he gets his way and makes them steam powered, probably not great.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I hate it so much that the steam powered thing is not satire.

Taco is really that stupid.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah i thought battleships were obsolete haha just like the big orange man

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What is it with extremist regimes and battleships?

[–] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I’m sure it’s a penis thing.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I wish it was but I’m convinced Trump is such a pussy he doesn’t even have an excuse for a penis.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

Beat me to it..

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Given the incompetence he surrounds himself with, this class will end up like the Wasa.

[–] doc@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exclusive first look at renderings of Trump class warship.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] MOARbid1@piefed.social 2 points 8 months ago

Omfg, this is great! Thanks for the laugh, stranger!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Based on how many years it takes to build a battleship, Trump will be long gone before this brainfart is realized. Just more money pissed away do fuel his delusions of adequacy.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

I could see wanting to name one thing after myself if I were rich and famous, but naming multiple things after yourself starts to get obnoxious

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 8 months ago

Someone come up with a bingo card that has things still without his name on them. Won't take long to call a winner.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 1 points 8 months ago

First cheap gold-plated battleship in history